wow…this says it All..
Tomorrow morning a new sub site called ideas.innovatecrnc.com goes live on the Innovate CRNC website. I know what you’re saying, “Dude! what’s Innovate CRNC and why should I care?” well I’m glad you asked.
To get to know Innovate CRNC you first need to know who & what CRNC is, if you already know you’re one up on me because until recently I had no idea (this is no doubt due to the fact that I didn’t attend college as I was in the Marine Corps during those years) and was surprised to find out. CRNC is Responsible for overseeing the activity of all College Republicans in the country. Now obviously we’ve all heard of the College Republicans but I guess I didn’t realize that there was a mega independent 527 with an annual budget between 1.5 and 3 million dollars a year behind it. The Organization is one of the largest of it’s kind and serves some 275,000+ active College Republicans.ong others. Founded in 1892, CRNC is the largest and oldest youth grassroots organization in the U.S. and is most known for its election field representative program, which has been operational since the 1980’s. This program consists of field representatives going into states which that have close elections and are tasked with energizing college students on campus and getting them out knocking on doors, making phone calls, and helping Republican candidates win. This past election cycle there were about 23 field representatives in 5 different states (PA, OH, NV, MI, FL). The CRNC is also working on issue advocacy,especially with the national debt through its “Don’t Put it on Our Tab” campaign. Past notable CRs include: Karl Rove, Grover Norquist, Lee Atwater, Rick Davis, Rick Santorum, and President Calvin Coolidge among others.
So now that we know who & what the CRNC is we can concentrate on what Innovate CRNC is…
Recently, there have been reports about endocrine disruptors or carcinogens in everyday cosmetics. These facts might seem shocking, but one has to be careful when dealing with campaigns that try to scare people. The truth is that many of the foods we eat have natural carcinogens or endocrine disruptors, and nobody is trying to ban them, nor should they.
Below are some of the many studies regarding this issue:
Tolman study (PDF) “NATURE’S HORMONE FACTORY”: http://cei.org/sites/default/files/Jo…
“Personal care products and endocrine disruption: A critical review of the literature”: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/pdf/…
Stephen Safe study, “Endocrine Disruptors and Human Health–Is There a Problem? An Update”: http://ehp03.niehs.nih.gov/article/fe…
Chemicals and Endocrine disruptors (PDF): http://cei.org/sites/default/files/An…
Cancer & chemicals: http://cei.org/sites/default/files/An…
More Studies: http://cei.org/studies-other-studies/…
Adult Conversations only work when the side that’s advocating for them isn’t in the business of deciding what an Adult Conversation is. This sophomoric tactic is in regular use with this administration, remember the Health Care debate in which the president kept insisting he wanted to hear idea’s for Republicans, only to turn around after hearing them, categorize them as “old ideas”, and dismiss them out of hand.
You see, engaging in Adult Conversations requires one to act like and Adult, unfortunately, with this administration… all evidence to the contrary!
The video above presents an astounding view of Space Shuttle Discovery as she embarked on her final mission.
The shuttle program will soon recede into history because of competing funding priorities and the visionless policy choices of the Obama administration. We are left with a government dominated by special interest group politics and their shop-a-holic claims on the public purse, while projects with a true national purpose are abandoned.
Today is a time to celebrate the achievements of the shuttle, to remember the work and the sacrifice of those who wrote this memorable chapter in the American story, and to get on with the mission of procuring new leadership for our country!
From Caleb Howe @ RedState:
This is the latest web ad from FreedomWorks. Focusing on the ongoing union protests, the video promotes their new website, FreedomConnector.com. I’ve used the site several times and it is a fantastic way to keep track of particular congressional districts, including who is holding events, when, where, and why. It also connects users to other politically active folks in their area. It’s very useful, very user friendly, and as Glenn Beck points out, it removes “the middleman“. It’s well worth checking out, and the video above gives you a compelling look at why it’s so important to do now.
…is three-fold. First, unionized teachers. Second, administrators. Third, the politicians who employ them.
OK, got the message on the sign?
We don’t pay teachers enough. At least according to this American Federation of Teachers picket. I’m sure the larger and leftier National Education Association agrees. As does every Democrat elected official or wanna-be-elected-official in the country, given that the NEA and the AFT fund Democrats and in the 2007-08 cycle,
The National Education Association has earned a reputation for using campaign contributions to purchase the loyalty of lawmakers at the federal and state levels.
In the 2007-08 election cycle, for instance, the union, through its political action committees, spent a whopping $56 million on various candidates and state ballot proposals. That ranked the NEA as the largest political contributor in the nation, outspending the second-place donor by more than $12 million.
Cross posted at Unified Patriots
What would your reaction be if your favorite ball team forfeited a significant portion of their games, then whined about not having a better than .500 season? Would you be calling for the coaches head? Or just drop the team as hopeless morons and become a fan of some other team? No matter what your reaction would be, I’d guess it wouldn’t be pride in your team.
That’s the situation in the Illinois legislature right now.
Illinois is divided into 118 Representative Districts and 2 Representative Districts are combined to form 1 Senate District. Out of those 118 house members 64 are Democrats and 54 are Republican. That’s a significant improvement over the previous house. We took 6 seats from the Dems in the November elections. (And I’m proud to say that I worked very hard to replace one of those Dems with a very capable man.) But here’s the problem. We forfeited 21* of those house seats! We gave them a full third of their wins! That’s right, in a year that saw Republican gains in even some of the bluest areas of the country, we gave away 21 seats. We just didn’t bother to show up.
I’m sure that most of you will point out that a fair number of those seats are in the Chicago area. And conventional wisdom is that a Republican has a snowball’s chance in hell of winning there. And conventional wisdom may be right if we do things in a conventional fashion.
The fact is that too many state parties have fallen into the same trap. They’ve come to believe that if an area has won by a heavy majority of one party’s votes in the past, it will always vote that way. They’re wrong.
None other than the ultimate Democrat politician Thomas P. (Tip) O’Neil** has given us the strategy for taking over a state that has been ruled by the “other” party for decades. When he was a cub in the Massachusetts state house, he was in a minority not unlike that of Republicans in Illinois. He faced a perpetual minority in his state with no hope of ever digging out of it. Except he didn’t play by the accepted rules.
Instead he and a few of his friends decided to try a different tactic. They actually ran candidates against entrenched incumbents . How? They would go to the local districts and talk to the locals. They’d find out who was popular and well respected in town (be he a local butcher, mayor of a small town, a retired teacher or whatever) and they’d talk him into running for the state house. They would get the guy on the ballot, get his campaign rolling by printing signs and whatnot, and funnel campaign cash to him (I don’t recommend using his methods for the latter, it’s all highly illegal now). By taking the time to find candidates who were already known to the districts and backing them, Tip was able to transform Massachusetts from a solid Republican state to the bluest of the Democrat strongholds in just a few years.
I’m recommending the Illinois GOP and every other state party learn a lesson from this. You can’t win if you don’t play.
** Go get his book from the local library and READ it! If they don’t have a copy in their stacks they’ll probably be able to borrow a copy from another library.
O’Neill, Thomas P., Jr., and Gary Hymel. All Politics Is Local, and Other Rules of the Game. New York: Times Books, 1993.
Governor Christie on CBS’s Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer on Sunday, February 27, 2011.
BOB SCHIEFFER: Well, now to the protests, back home protests of a very different kind. These are peaceful protests in Madison, Wisconsin, by union members. That demonstration is moving into its thirteenth day. Yesterday’s turnout of seventy thousand was the largest yet. And yesterday, union workers across the country turned out to support them, these demonstrations over the Wisconsin governor’s plan to reduce spending by ending the collective bargaining rights of teachers and many other public service employees.
Well Governor Christie, you took on the– the public service unions in New Jersey. But you didn’t talk about ending collective bargaining rights. Do you think Governor Walker out there in Wisconsin has gone too far?
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE (R-New Jersey): Bob, let me tell you what– what went on in New Jersey. My predecessor Governor Corzine stood on the front steps of the Capitol at a public sector union rally and said, “I’ll fight to get you a good contract.” And I thought to myself watching that, who’s he fighting with? Once he says that the fights over. What I believe in is true adversarial collective bargaining. And so, every state is different. I’m not going to micromanage Wisconsin from Trenton, New Jersey. I know Scott Walker. I like him. And I trust him. And I think he believe he’s doing what’s in the best interest of Wisconsin, the same way I’m going to do what I think needs to be done for New Jersey, which is, to reform the pension system and roll
back health benefits for public sector workers, to put them more in line with the rest of the population in New Jersey, to put us on a long-term path to fiscal stability.
BOB SCHIEFFER: Well, but what about this idea? Do they have a right to collective bargaining?
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE: Now listen. All these rights are legislatively created. They didn’t come down from tablets at the top of a mountain. And so, political things change and go back and forth. And every state is going to make their own determination on that. Wisconsin is in the middle of making that determination. As you know, Bob, there are plenty of states in America where that right doesn’t exist. And so, each state has to make their own determination on that.
BOB SCHIEFFER: Well, is that good or bad for New Jersey? Do you think they ought to have the right in New Jersey to collective bargaining?
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE: What I’ve said in New Jersey is, as long as it’s fair and reasonable collective bargaining. You know, we can’t have what we’ve had before. You know, Bob, public sector workers, state workers in New Jersey, this past year, were working under a contract from my predecessor Jon Corzine, got seven percent salary increases in a zero percent inflation world. I don’t think the people who are paying the bills think that’s the result of fair adversarial collective bargaining. They want someone in the room representing the taxpayers. And that’s what I’ll be this June, when that contract expires.
BOB SCHIEFFER: Do you see a danger here that this is turning into some kind of may be not a danger, may be it’s something you would encourage, turning into some kind of national political war, where you have Democrats and the unions on one side and Republicans on the other?
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE: I– I don’t think it is. I think again, there are so many states that don’t have collective bargaining and there are a lot of states are not having this conflict right now. And so, I think this is really a state-by-state issue. There’s a lot of interest in this right now because of the emotion that’s going on in Wisconsin–strong stand by Governor Walker and a
strong stand by the people on the other side. It’ll be resolved politically in the state legislature in Wisconsin. So, I don’t see it that way. Obviously, it has national interest in story, Bob, but we’ve been taking on the unions in New Jersey for the last year and that’s gotten a lot of attention too. So everybody is doing it their own way.
BOB SCHIEFFER: Let me ask you this. You really came on hard against the teachers’ union. I think everybody in this country on all sides of all this thinks we need education reform that we’ve got to do something to make our educational system better. Do you worry that the stance you have taken has somehow demonized teachers and– and will raise questions in young people’s minds as to whether they want to go into the profession?
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE: No, I don’t. In fact, I did quite the opposite. Listen, I think that the teachers in New Jersey, and there’s thousands and thousands of great ones deserve a union as good as they are and they don’t have it. And, I disagree with the premise of your question which is that everybody agrees there should be education reform. It’s everybody, but the teachers union who believes that everything is fine. If you listen to them in New Jersey, they’ll tell you everything is fine. I mean it’s great. It’s great except for the hundred and four thousand kids in New Jersey that are struck in– stuck in two hundred chronically-failing schools. I mean, you know just because their zip code is in a poor urban center doesn’t mean we should be fighting to change the system that’s failing them. So, no. What I’m trying to do is have a merit-based system for teachers, so that great ones get rewarded and paid more and that the really great ones want to stay in the profession, not only because they love it but because they’re rewarded financially for it. The union, Bob, they protect the worse of the worst. That’s what there for, they make it impossible to fire bad teachers and it’s ruining our education system.
BOB SCHIEFFER: What do you think of President Obama’s plans to reform education at the federal level by his– you know let’s reward good teachers. His, you know, the– the things that Secretary Duncan has outlined. Are– are you– generally think he’s on the right track?
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE: I do. And– and I’ve said that publicly. I think the President has shown some real courage, especially for a Democrat who’s been dependent upon the teachers union nationally for political support to come out for merit pay and race to the top and some of the things he’s done to push reform, I think the President has been on the right track. I’m little concerned about comments I heard yesterday from Secretary Duncan that seemed to be, you know blowing the hornet for treat on that a little bit. And I– I hope that that’s not an election year ploy for them to cozy back up to the NEA and the ATF, as the President prepares for reelection. But in general, I think the President has been very strong on this. And that’s why you see Republicans agreeing with him on it.
BOB SCHIEFFER: You have a reputation as a straight talker I think. Do you believe that the budgetary problems across this country can be resolved without raising taxes?
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE: Well, let’s take New Jersey, for instance, Bob. We raised taxes and fees a hundred and fifteen times in the last eight years. And we still have one of the worst budget problems in America. And so, I think unless you deal with the underlying structural expense problems and we’ve been dealing with them in New Jersey, you– there’s no amount of taxation is ever going to keep up with the amount of spending increase that we have. And so, my view is we’ve already done things on the tax side in New Jersey. We have one of the highest top marginal income tax rates one of the highest sales tax rates, one of the highest corporate business tax rates. What we need to get to now is cutting back the size and scope of
government and have those two things meet. For instance, this year in my budget, while we still reduce spending, I added two hundred and fifty million dollars to K-12 education. We’re going to do things that make sense. But we’re not going to continue the spending spree and we’re certainly not just going back to raising more and more taxes. The people in New Jersey have had enough of that. Hundred and fifteen times in eight years, I think they’d given it the office, Bob.
BOB SCHIEFFER: You know there are some groups, anti-tax groups that ask people, especially people who are running for the Republican nomination for president to take a pledge not to raise taxes. I know you’re not running. I know what you’ve said about running. But it’s– would you do that? Would you ever take a pledge not to raise taxes?
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE: Well, listen. If I were running, I guess I’d have to make that decision. But at the end of the day I think what matters much more is what you do and not anything that you sign or– or that you say. You have to prove and do it. And I think the reason why people in New Jersey are responding to what we’re doing is I’m actually doing in the job,
Bob, what I said I would do. I said if there were income tax increases I would veto them. I did and my veto was sustained. I said I would cut spending in the size of government. We’ve now
cut spending two years in a row–not projected spending, real spending. And we’re taking on the things that they’re not taking on at the federal level–pension benefits and health care. And we’re doing those two things to cut back the cost of that.
BOB SCHIEFFER: One of the things that you have spoken out on is something that a lot of people in politics have not. Here’s what you said at the American Enterprise Institute this week
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE (February 16): You’re going to have to raise the retirement age for Social Security. Oh, I just said it and I’m still standing here. I did not vaporize into the carpeting and I said it.
BOB SCHIEFFER: All right. You said it.
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE: I did.
BOB SCHIEFFER: Should– should other people be saying that?
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE: Of course, I mean, listen, you know and I know that the overall majority has a problem on the federal level comes down to three programs–Social Security,
Medicare and Medicaid. And unless we go about tackling those three issues, all the rest of the things that the President is talking about and others on Capitol Hill are talking about are minor league issues. Not saying they’re not important. Not saying they’re not, you know, interesting and– and– and I might like some of them. But if you don’t deal with those three, those three are
going to eat up everything else. And so, we’ve to start dealing with it. And I think the people of the United States are– are ready for a frank, adult conversation about it. I’ve seen that in New
Jersey. I’ve done a lot of things that people say I don’t like but I’m glad you’re taking it on because you have to, because we know we’re in trouble. And so, my view on it and the reason I came down and gave that speech was to say to people stop being afraid and stop telling– selling the people of America short. They’re smart. They know we have to do this.
BOB SCHIEFFER: All right. Governor, let’s take a break here. And we’ll come back and talk about this and some other things, including the government shutdown that may be coming in
this country in– in– in Washington. Back in a minute.
BOB SCHIEFFER: And we’re back now with Governor Christie. Governor, Congress is back this week and the first thing they’ve got to tackle is some sort of emergency stopgap legislation to
keep the con– government from shutting down. But I know there are a lot of people in your party, especially on the Tea Party side, who say maybe just let the government shut down. Let’s do not compromise on– on spending. Do you think it would be a good idea to shut the government down?
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE: I don’t, unless that’s the only way to forward your principles. And I think they’re going to be able to find a way to find compromise that protects the principles
that, you know the folks in my party got elected on and the ones that are important to Democrats. I mean their job is to solve these problems and not just to stand in a corner and hold your breath. So– and I say that about both sides. So let’s get together. They’ve got a week to figure it out. Let’s get in the room and figure it out. I was a little surprised they took the last week off, to tell you the truth, given that this was looming. Why? I– I think most Americans wanted to know why they weren’t go to work, but they’re getting back to work tomorrow. So let’s get back to work and let’s get it solved.
BOB SCHIEFFER: Well, what do you say to the Tea Party folks who say, look, I mean, it– it’s our way or no way. We have simply got to stop this and if it takes shutting down the government, shut it down.
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE: Well, those are two different things, right? I mean, I think that you can accomplish the goals of downsizing government, of cutting spending, and you can do it in a way that I think Democrats will go along with you on. I mean you have to have some fights. And that’s fine. As you know, I’m not, you know averse to a fight. But I think also you just have to get in a room and start working it out with people. That’s what we’ve done in New Jersey, Bob. Now I have a democratic legislature. And the things that I’ve accomplished with cutting
spending and putting a cap on property taxes, cap on interest arbitration awards, reforming initially for new employees pension and benefits, I’ve done that with a democratic legislature. It means I don’t get every ounce of what I want but we get in a room and we work it out. And that’s what they should do down here.
BOB SCHIEFFER (overlapping): Well–
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE: The President should lead on that.
BOB SCHIEFFER: Once they get this stopgap measure to keep the government running then they have to take a vote on– on whether to raise the debt ceiling. What’s your view on that?
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE: My view on it is that it better be in line also with some real long-term commitments to cutting spending. You’ve got to do both. And– and I think it’s a good
moment to force that conversation and they should. And– and I– I just believe that if the President shows leadership on this, he can bring the parties together. That’s what a president’s for.
BOB SCHIEFFER: Let’s talk about– let’s talk about President Obama. What do you think of the job he’s doing?
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE: Listen, there are some things I like and there some things I don’t like. The spending has been out of control and not as advertised when he ran for
president. And– and that’s very disappointing to me. I’m– I’m not a fan of the health care reform. And I think it’s unnecessarily hamstrung states. And I doubt that it’s constitutional. Now
on the other side, as I said before I like what he’s done on education reform. And I think it’s a Nixon to China kind of moment. You know, we need a democratic president to make these
reforms in education to lead the way. I– I like some of the things he’s had to say in renewable energy because I think we need to find a path to lower our dependence on foreign oil and– and
we can see what’s going on in the Middle East this week. That it can turn things upside down for us. So I like some of the things he’s been doing on that as well. But, you know, overall, I didn’t vote for him. And I doubt I’ll vote for him next time.
BOB SCHIEFFER: A lot of Republicans, you know are giving hints, indications and so forth that they may or may not seek the Republican nomination to run against Barack Obama. You have said in one of the– one of your memorable quotes, I’ve– if I have, I– I’d have to commit suicide to convince people I’m not running. Well, you may or may not walk back from the ledge on that. What– you haven’t been all that kind I guess is what I would say to– to some of the people that do seem to be suggesting they’re going to run. What do you like about the field so far and what don’t you like?
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE: Well, we don’t have a field yet. First of all, no one has declared. And– and what I’ve said is let’s judge the complete field once they all get in. You know lots of people can flirt with it, Bob. But you know it’s– it’s an enormous decision to make the decision to run for president of the United States and enormous personal commitment. When the team that we’re going to field gets in there, then I’ll make my evaluation of them. And I don’t think I’ve said anything uncharitable about any of them. I’ve said some very nice things about Governor Daniels but I’ve said those things because I really believe that Governor Daniels is speaking about the issues that need to be spoken about and has a track record in Indiana that proves he can actually do it. That doesn’t mean I’d endorse Governor Daniels if he ran. But what it means is, I think those are the things that other people who are considering running should be looking at and talking about, to having an honest conversation with the American people.
BOB SCHIEFFER: Well, what you have said is they’ve got to get out here and talk about these things that are going to be the issues, that you can’t finesse it.
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE: No, you can’t finesse it. And then– and you have to have unscripted moments. I mean you cannot be blow dried and, you know, poll tested and come out here. That’s not what the American people want. They want somebody who is going to speak straight to them. And they want to ask you questions, so they want unguarded moments. That’s
when they can really judge your character.
BOB SCHIEFFER: Is that– is that aimed at, say, Sarah Palin who seems to talk to people mostly on her website and– and not– and she doesn’t do many interviews?
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE: Well, I– I think it’s– it’s aimed at all of them. But certainly, when I first made that comment, it was in response to a question about Governor Palin. And I think if she wants to prove she’s ready for this, you got to have to have some unscripted moments. Now she may very well be up to it and if she is, good for her, but I think people want to see that. Very– they’re very much interested in her. So they want to see that about her to make a judgment as to can you trust somebody in the Oval Office who can do that? Unless you do those unscripted moments, I think it’s hard to get the person to pull the lever for you.
BOB SCHIEFFER (overlapping): What– I mean do you think she’s ready?
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE: Well, listen. She’s got to make that judgment herself. And you know what, Bob, I’ll make my vote in the voting booth privately like every other American.
BOB SCHIEFFER: All right. Let me– let me ask you this. Some of the people on the right have sort of poked fun and made fun of Michelle Obama, because she’s been trying to get people to eat better. I know that you have done dieting. You have worked on your weight and so forth. You described yourself as portly. Do you think– what do you think about this criticism coming
from the right of Michelle Obama, because she’s trying to get people to eat better.
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE: Well, I think it’s unnecessary. I think it’s a really good goal to encourage kids to eat better. You know, I’ve– I’ve struggled with my weight for thirty years and
it’s a struggle. And if a kid can avoid that in his adult years or her adult years, more power to them. And I think the first lady is speaking out well. I mean, I don’t want the government deciding what you can and what you can’t eat. I still think that’s your choice. But I think Mrs. Obama being out there encouraging people in a positive way to eat well and to exercise and to be healthy, I don’t have a problem with that.
BOB SCHIEFFER: Governor Christie, thank you so much. I hope you’ll come back to see us.
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE (overlapping): Absolutely, I will.
BOB SCHIEFFER: We enjoyed having you.
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE: Thank you, Bob.
Goldman and Zandi claim spending cuts – as included in the House-passed H.R. 1 – will reduce economic growth. John Taylor says “[n]othing could be more contrary to basic economics, experience and facts.” As Taylor argues, analysis used by Goldman Zachs, Mark Zandi, and partisan Democrats “was wrong in the past and it is highly likely to be wrong again”:
“Some claim that House budget proposal H.R. 1 to reduce the growth of federal government spending will cause a slowdown in the economy and even increase unemployment. Consider, for example, a recent report by Alec Phillips of Goldman Sachs which claims that the House proposal would reduce economic growth in the second and third quarters of this year by 1.5 to 2 percent if enacted into law next month. Nothing could be more contrary to basic economics, experience and facts. …
“Basic economic models in which incentives and expectations of future policy matter show that a credible plan to reduce gradually the deficit will increase economic growth and reduce unemployment by removing uncertainty and lowering the chances of large tax increases in the future. The high unemployment we are experiencing now is due to low private investment rather than low government spending. By reducing some uncertainty and the threats of exploding debt, the House spending proposal will encourage private investment.
“The analysis in this Goldman-Sachs report is based on the same type of ‘large multiplier’ theory that predicted that the stimulus package of 2009 would stimulate economic growth. Research by me and my colleague John Cogan finds that more up-to-date theories, which bring important incentive and expectations effects into account, show far smaller multipliers. In these models a reduction in the growth of spending will immediately crowd in private investment. Moreover, by following the stimulus money, we found that in actuality the stimulus package of 2009 had no material positive effect on economic growth or employment. The same economic theory which said the stimulus would increase economic growth in the past two years, says that reversing that spending will reduce growth now. It was wrong in the past and it is highly likely to be wrong again.”
Read Taylor’s full post here. Taylor was also among the group of 150 economists who signed a statement arguing for immediate action “to begin to slow government spending, reduce uncertainty and support the creation of new private-sector jobs.” You can read their statement here.
Goldman Sachs and Mark Zandi are principal defenders of the president’s “stimulus” fiasco and were often cited as sources who claimed the spending bill would work. Both are referenced on page 21 of this White House report. And Zandi argued in January 2009, for example, that “the country will have 4 million more jobs by the end of 2010” if the “stimulus” passed – “143,000 of them in Georgia.”
Well, through November 2010, Georgia lost 123,000 jobs – in fact, 47 out of 50 states have lost jobs since the “stimulus” was signed, and our unemployment rate has topped 9 percent for 21 consecutive months (despite promises by the Obama Administration that it wouldn’t rise above 8 percent).