EXCESSIVE REGULATION[list type="arrow"] [li]
- The EPA’s Regulation & Its Effects
- National Ombudsman
- The Future of the List Company, Inc.
The EPA’s Regulation & Its Effects
In 2007, the List Company was importing a private label brand of equipment (i.e., engines). While the products met EPA’s specific environmental standards, the EPA had an issue with the labels on the product. Specifically, whether the labels were “non- removable.”
According to an article in Forbes:
Latham ran afoul of both U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the Environmental Protection Agency when importing home-power generators from China. Customs agents claimed the EPA-compliant labels on the generator boxes could be easily removed — a no-no according to the law — despite plenty of additional proof that Latham had passed all relevant inspections. “We had certification that the EPA had worked with the [contract manufacturing] factory in China and photographs that the factory sent us of all the inspections,” he says.1
The EPA requires that any non-road engines ignited by a spark have a permanent and legible label that identifies the engine and specifies the engine lubricant. When the List Company attempted to import generators and chainsaws that featured labels that did not fit the EPA’s definition of permanent or specify the lubricant2, the agency seized the List Company’s inventory. As a result, the company nearly had to cease operations.
After meeting with the EPA face-to-face, Latham was told he would have to send the products back to China or pay to have them destroyed.3 According to Latham, the fees he was paying to store the equipment, in addition to the fines that had been imposed on him, were pushing his business to the brink. It was at that point he began to cold call government officials.
Latham’s cold calling eventually led him to Nick Owens, the National Ombudsman at the Small Business Administration. In 1996, Congress created the Office of the National Ombudsman so small businesses to have a place to go in the federal government when they felt they had been treated unfairly in regulatory compliance or enforcement activities4.
According to Forbes:
Within several days [after calling], the ombudsman had arranged for Latham to pay a $10,000 fine, re-affix the labels, and sell the generators. It was an expensive lesson, but having to pay a stiff fine is a lot better than going out of business.
The Future of the List Company Inc.
After the incident, Latham diversified his business model and his business has grown. Today, instead of primarily relying on imports like he did in 2007, his company concentrates on selling goods made in America. This story has a happy ending, but there could be hundreds or thousands of other businesses like Latham’s that never found an advocate to help when the cost of overregulation became too much.