Invisible Obama

Invisible Obama came down from the RNC to party with us! We had a total blast!
Also please tell others to watch this video so we can get money and Brandon can get a haircut.
Fact Checkers

New CAPE PAC Ad – Dean Heller: FACT VS FICTION #NVSen

Today CAPE PAC (The Coalition of Americans for Political Equality Political Action Committee) released a new ad titled Dean Heller: Fact Vs. Fiction.
CAPE PAC – Dean Heller: FACT VS FICTION from CAPE PAC on Vimeo.
Also today, a letter to the editor appeared in the Elko Daily Free Press entitled: The ‘other’ Shelley Berkley
Editor: I read with interest the article reporting on Shelley Berkley’s recent visit and related statements considering what she obviously thinks about rural Nevada and its major industries:
During her last visit, April 2012, she stated she was “nervous” to be around Elko Democrats;
In January of 2001, as reported by the Las Vegas Review Journal, Berkley told state legislators she did not want to have her district redrawn to represent rural areas” only urban Las Vegas;
Again in January of 2001, The Hill reported her statement “I don’t think I have to be traipsing up to Carlin to look at your mines” when there are so many problems in LV;
Voting against the Grazing Improvement Act addressing the permitting renewal process allowing ranchers to continue to graze animals on public land as the process proceeds;
Voting against the recent request for land purchase in Yerington that would provide hundreds of jobs at a proposed mining project when Lyon County is one of the most depressed counties in the state.
On top of all that, she is under investigation by the ethics commission over sponsoring federal funding to her husband’s renal and dialysis clinic. Interestingly, the clinic was under investigation with a recommendation to shut down for unusually high rates of treatment failures and death. Coincidentally, her No. 8 donor is in the business of providing dialysis devices. Do you think those devices just may be used at her husband’s clinic?
As the Democrat House Minority Leader says, “bless their hearts”!
Carol Madsen
Elko
Armed Bystander Stops Stabbing Outside School

Another glowing example of why we need to stop overbearing restrictions on guns and concealed carry laws…
From WOAI:
A woman is in critical condition after she was stabbed outside her child’s school Tuesday morning.
The attack happened around 10:00 a.m. Tuesday outside the Bonham Academy on St. Mary’s Street. Teresa Barron, 38, had just dropped off her child at the school when the child’s father showed up, and the two got into an argument. The child’s father, 38-year-old Roberto Barron allegedly then stabbed the woman several times in the upper body and neck area.
Police say a bystander who happened to be a concealed handgun license holder pulled his weapon and ordered Barron to drop the knife. Barron surrendered and was taken into custody by the bystander and a school district officer.
The woman was taken to San Antonio Military Medical Center
InfoGraphic: CCAGW Issues Biden/Ryan Vote Rating and Budget Comparison

(Washington, D.C.) – Today, the Council for Citizens Against Government Waste (CCAGW) released a comparison of the 2012 vice presidential candidates’ voting records on legislation affecting government waste and the fiscal health of the federal government. The results emphatically indicate that House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan’s (R-Wis.) voting record is far superior to that of former senator and current Vice President Joe Biden. Since 1989, CCAGW has examined all roll call votes to determine which members of Congress stand up for the taxpayers’ interests and which fail to promote fiscal responsibility, separating the praiseworthy from the profligate on critical tax, spending, transparency and accountability issues.
“Chairman Ryan’s 92 percent lifetime rating with CCAGW has earned him the status of ‘Taxpayer Hero,’ a distinction that he has earned both in the aggregate and during each of the 12 years that his votes have been rated,” said CCAGW President Tom Schatz. “In contrast, Vice President Biden earned an ‘unfriendly’ lifetime rating of just 22 percent during the 18 years in which CCAGW rated his votes. Obviously, Chairman Ryan has done a much better job of protecting the interests of taxpayers.
“In addition to his stellar voting record, Chairman Ryan has led the charge against skyrocketing federal budgets that threaten the government’s fiscal solvency and the prosperity of future generations. His “Path to Prosperity” budget stands in stark contrast to the “path to bankruptcy” budget that has been proposed by President Obama and Vice President Biden. Even Democrats recognized that the Obama-Biden budget was completely unreasonable, as both the House and Senate have unanimously rejected their plan.
“Many of the provisions of Chairman Ryan’s budget have been championed by CCAGW in the past and would constitute important victories for taxpayers in their own right, such as eliminating high-speed rail subsidies, cutting payments to prosperous farmers, and reducing the federal workforce by 10 percent.
“While Chairman Ryan’s plan has been called ‘extreme’ by opponents, including Vice President Biden, the term is more aptly applied to the annual budget deficits of more than $1 trillion and accumulated $5 trillion in debt that has been produced by the Obama administration over the past four years. Chairman Ryan has been and will remain an articulate advocate for a rational solution to the nation’s financial woes. CCAGW welcomes this critical debate over a clear choice between prosperity and bankruptcy through November 6 and beyond,” Schatz concluded.
BA Spending Daily August 31, 2012

“The economy has stolen my retirement”
The Wall Street Journal reports, “The weak economy has been tough for small-business owners across the board, with their total revenue inching up by just 3% since 2007 and declining in fields such as construction (-12%), real-estate services (-3%) and retailing (-2%), according to financial-software maker Intuit Inc. But for entrepreneurs in their 60s and 70s, the consequences have been particularly vexing. Many of them are stuck in ‘business purgatory,’ unable to retire and forced to hang on for a recovery that economists say could still be a long way off. … Nearly half of the 799 small-business owners surveyed in August by The Wall Street Journal and Vistage International, an executive-mentoring organization, expect to retire after age 65, with 38% saying that their planned retirement date is later than they had predicted five years ago. In addition, 56% said most of their retirement nest egg is tied to their business.” One small business owner, Judy Lawton, 69, “hasn’t taken a vacation in years because she can’t afford to travel. ‘The economy has stolen my retirement,’ she says.”
Are We Going Over the Fiscal Cliff?
Real Clear Politics reports, “Republicans unveiled an unsettling new toy at their convention in the form of a continually updating ‘national debt clock.’ During three days of speechifying, the clock added $12 billion to the debt, which is now more than $15.9 trillion. … According to the Pew Research Center, 70 percent of Americans are alarmed by the debt, which rose roughly $200 billion a year during George W. Bush’s eight years in office and a trillion dollars a year in President Obama’s four. But what concerns economists more than the debt is the impending fiscal cliff, shorthand for the crisis that will face the U.S. government at the end of 2012. At that time, taxes will soar and government spending will plunge. … John Cogan, a public policy professor at Stanford and former deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget, ”worries that ‘super hyper-partisanship’ in Washington will make it difficult to reach a post-election agreement. He compares falling off the fiscal cliff to an earthquake in California or a hurricane along the Gulf Coast. ‘The probability of these events isn’t high, but the consequences when they occur can be disastrous,’ he said.”
Economy’s Struggle May Prompt Fed Action
The Associated Press reports, “Few expect Chairman Ben Bernanke to signal at a Federal Reserve conference Friday in Jackson Hole, Wyo., that the Fed is about to take major new action to boost the economy. No one is sure, though. Three years after the end of the Great Recession, the U.S. economy is still struggling to break out of a slog that’s kept unemployment at a painfully high 8.3 percent. After its last policy meeting, the Fed repeated a pledge to try to boost growth if hiring remains weak. And minutes of that meeting showed that some Fed officials felt the economy would need more support ‘fairly soon’ unless it improved significantly.”
“Euro hits 8-week high versus dollar”
Reuters reports, “The euro rose to an eight-week high against the dollar on Friday before a speech by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke which would push the U.S. currency lower if he signals more monetary easing may be imminent. Following comments by European Central Bank executive board member Benoit Coeure, the euro also benefited from anticipation that the bank will announce clear steps to tackle the euro zone debt crisis at its policy meeting next week. … Expectations Bernanke will signal another imminent round of asset buying, or quantitative easing, have ebbed recently following better U.S. economic data, allowing the dollar to recover. But some analysts said this has merely provided better levels to sell.”
Most New Jobs Added in Recovery Are Low Paying
The New York Times reports, “While a majority of jobs lost during the downturn were in the middle range of wages, a majority of those added during the recovery have been low paying, according to a new report from the National Employment Law Project. The disappearance of midwage, midskill jobs is part of a longer-term trend that some refer to as a hollowing out of the work force, though it has probably been accelerated by government layoffs. ‘The overarching message here is we don’t just have a jobs deficit; we have a ‘good jobs’ deficit,’ said Annette Bernhardt, the report’s author and a policy co-director at the National Employment Law Project, a liberal research and advocacy group.”
Romney Gives “Passing Reference” to Medicare in Speech
Politico reports, “Mitt Romney’s most significant political speech of the 2012 campaign made only a passing reference to two of the biggest issues in the entire election: Medicare and the future of President Barack Obama’s health care law. In the whole speech, which lasted about 45 minutes, there were exactly two lines about health care. One was the same attack on Obama’s Medicare cuts that Paul Ryan made last night. The other was the standard pledge to repeal ‘Obamacare.’ … On the night when he had the biggest national audience he’s had since the first days of the campaign, Romney didn’t talk about what he’d put in place of Obama’s health care law — even though it could have been a prime opportunity to win public support for the market-oriented, state-based reforms he says he wants.”
RNC Debt Clock Reaches $8.5 Billion
The Hill reports, “The final tally of American debt accumulated during the Republican convention: $8,539,526,393.07. … Republicans used the debt, totaling nearly $16 trillion, as one of their persistent themes at the convention and on the campaign trail to hammer on President Obama for his policies, which they say are leading to a crushing amount of public debt that could destabilize the nation.”
#NVSen: Heller Ad Shows Berkley Raids Medicare by $1 Trillion

Steals from Seniors to Pay for More Big Government Programs
(Las Vegas, NV) – Heller for Senate released a new ad today that shows how seven-term Congresswoman Shelley Berkley has used her time in Congress voting to strip more than one trillion dollars from Medicare to fund big government programs. The ad shows that Shelley Berkley is the only candidate in this race that has established a pattern of cutting funds from Medicare, despite all of Shelley Berkley’s press conferences, press releases and rhetoric claiming otherwise.
“Shelley Berkley doesn’t really like dealing with facts, especially since she’s based her entire campaign on the ‘Lie of the Year.’ But the fact is that seven-term Congresswoman Shelley Berkley has voted to raid the Medicare program by one trillion dollars over the course of her fourteen years in Congress. Shelley Berkley has repeatedly broken her commitment to Nevada seniors and has, over and over again, used this vital program as a piggy bank to pay for more big government programs. Maybe Shelley Berkley was just hoping no one would notice, but when Medicare goes bankrupt in just over ten years, believe me, Shelley Berkley, Nevada seniors will notice,” said Chandler Smith, Heller for Senate spokeswoman.
1) Fact: “A trillion dollars. That’s how much Shelley Berkley voted to cut from Medicare.”
· Cut 1: $193 billion – H.R. 3162; Vote #787, Aug. 1, 2007; “Estimated Effect on Direct Spending and Revenues of H.R. 3162, the Children’s Health and Medicare Protection Act, for the Rules Committee,” Congressional Budget Office, Aug. 1, 2007
· Cut 2: $716 billion – ObamaCare; Vote #165, H.R. 3590; Vote #167, H.R. 4872, March 21, 2010; Letter to the Honorable John Boehner, Congressional Budget Office, July 24, 2012
· Cut 3: $123 billion – Budget Control Act; Vote #690, S 365, Aug. 1, 2011; “Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act,” Congressional Budget Office, Sept. 12, 2011
2) Fact: “She voted to cut two hundred billion in 2007.”
· Shelley Berkley voted for H.R. 3162, which raided the Medicare program by $193 billion in order to pay for more big government programs. (Vote #787, HR 3162, Aug. 1, 2007)
Excerpts from the CBO cost analysis below:
· TITLE IV — MEDICARE ADVANTAGE REFORMS
Total, Title IV 2008 – 2017: -$157.0 billion
· TITLE V — PROVISIONS RELATING TO MEDICARE PART A
Total, Title V 2008-2017: -$15.8 billion
· TITLE VI — OTHER PROVISIONS RELATING TO MEDICARE PART B
Total, Title VI 2008-2017: -$12.0 billion
· TITLE VII — PROVISIONS RELATING TO MEDICARE PARTS A AND B
Total, Title VII 2008-2017: -$8.1 billion
(“Estimated Effect on Direct Spending and Revenues of H.R. 3162, the Children’s Health and Medicare Protection Act, for the Rules Committee,” Congressional Budget Office, Aug. 1, 2007)
Fact: “Seven Hundred billion cut from our Medicare to pay for ObamaCare.”
· Shelley Berkley voted for ObamaCare, which took funds from Medicare to pay for other parts of the bill (Vote #165, HR 3590, Vote #167 HR 4872, March 21, 2010).
· The total cost to the Medicare program is $716 billion. (Letter to the Honorable John Boehner, Congressional Budget Office, July 24, 2012
http://cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/43471-hr6079.pdf)
Fact: “One hundred billion more just last year.”
· Shelley Berkley voted for the Budget Control Act (Vote #690, S 365, Aug. 1, 2011), which mandated 2 percent cuts to the Medicare program at an estimate cost of $123 billion.
· From the CBO cost estimate: “Reductions of 2.0 percent each year in most Medicare spending because of the application of a special rule that applies to that program, producing savings of $123 billion, and reductions ranging from 7.8 percent (in 2013) to 5.5 percent (in 2021) in mandatory budgetary resources for other nonexempt nondefense programs and activities, yielding savings of $47 billion. Thus, savings in nondefense mandatory spending would total $170 billion.” (“Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act,” Congressional Budget Office, Sept. 12, 2011)
Fact: “And Shelley Berkley’s attacks against Dean Heller?” “They were named Lie of the Year.”
· “Lie of the Year 2011: ‘Republicans voted to end Medicare,’” www.PolitiFact.com, Dec. 20, 2011
Fact: “Shelley Berkley. A trillion dollars in cuts to Medicare.”
· Cut 1: $193 billion – H.R. 3162; Vote #787, Aug. 1, 2007; “Estimated Effect on Direct Spending and Revenues of H.R. 3162, the Children’s Health and Medicare Protection Act, for the Rules Committee,” Congressional Budget Office, Aug. 1, 2007
· Cut 2: $716 billion – ObamaCare; Vote #165, H.R. 3590; Vote #167, H.R. 4872, March 21, 2010; Letter to the Honorable John Boehner, Congressional Budget Office, July 24, 2012
· Cut 3: $123 billion – Budget Control Act; Vote #690, S 365, Aug. 1, 2011; “Estimated Impact of Automatic Budget Enforcement Procedures Specified in the Budget Control Act,” Congressional Budget Office, Sept. 12, 2011
Learn the difference between Dean Heller and Shelley Berkley: http://deanheller.com/Difference
#AZSen Update: Democrats are Daydreaming about their Chances in the Grand Canyon State

In Arizona, the Arizona Republic reports that Democrats are daydreaming about their chances in the Grand Canyon State. The monumental nature of Jeff Flake’s victory in the Republican primary for U.S. Senate is still sinking in. … Democrats keep trying to convince themselves that Richard Carmona has a chance against Flake in the general election. Hard to see it as other than a daydream. The Republican registration advantage over Democrats has nearly doubled since the last presidential election, from 96,000 votes to 178,000. So, Democrats in the state have a much larger hill to climb in a statewide race. Independent registration has swollen since the last presidential election, by over 200,000 voters. But this doesn’t really offer Carmona as much hope as Democrats are proclaiming.
- Meanwhile, while National Democrats were excited about a “bloody primary” in Arizona, Roll Call reports that Flake feels embolden by his 50 point primary victory. On the first day of the general election campaign for Arizona’s open Senate seat, GOP nominee Rep. Jeff Flake popped up on the floor of the Republic National Convention, greeting well-wishers and discussing the state of his race. … “We felt good going along, but you never want to have a primary like that,” he added. “It was … I’m glad it’s done.” When asked about talk coming from Democrats that the primary has financially and strategically weakened him, Flake appeared unconcerned. The Congressman said he hoped Democrats would embrace the same strategy as his GOP primary opponent, Wil Cardon, because “it didn’t work very well for Cardin.”
- Additionally, make sure to read Doug MacEachern’s column in the Arizona Republic, where he reminds folks that since nobody could ever read Barry Goldwater’s mind when he was alive, it’s disingenuous for anyone to claim that Goldwater would’ve supported Richard Carmona. Some people named “Goldwater” are political conservatives. Some of them are liberals. One or two were related by marriage to the late, great Barry Goldwater. Most are blood relations. None could read Barry’s mind when he was alive. They certainly can’t now that he’s dead. It’s shameful how these people who happen to be named Goldwater trot out every political season to claim the title of “Barry Goldwater mind-reader,” for no better purpose than to hawk their own particular politics. A couple of them now are out stumping for the Democratic nominee for the U.S. Senate seat, Richard Carmona. Whatever good can be said of Dr. Carmona, one thing that cannot be said at all is what Barry Goldwater thinks of him. Barry, after all, is dead. And however much his liberal survivors want to leech off his name, they can’t possibly know what Barry would think of Carmona, either.
- Finally, the NRSC reminded voters that Carmona still supports President Obama’s $1.76 trillion, job-killing healthcare law. Less than 48 hours since he secured the Democrat nomination for U.S. Senate – thanks in large part to the fact that he was the only candidate personally recruited by President Barack Obama – Richard Carmona reaffirmed his support for ObamaCare. “After being recruited by President Obama, it should come as no surprise that Democrat Richard Carmona refuses to repeal the job-killing healthcare law,” said National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) spokesman Jahan Wilcox. “Given that Mr. Obama and Carmona’s healthcare law is the largest tax increase ever on middle-class families, Arizonans deserve a Senator – like Jeff Flake – who will repeal this costly law.”
The Clint Eastwood Gambit Worked Perfectly, But Not in the Way People Think

When I saw the Clint Eastwood speech yesterday, an image formed in my mind:

For those too young to remember that is Rowan & Martin’s Laugh-In and John Wayne in that bunny suit. That’s the last time I saw something this Ayptical from a Hollywood icon.
I thought Eastwood’s presentation was one of the weirdest things I’ve ever seen, somebody said on TV it was a variation of an old Morry Amsterdam bit (Eastwood is certainly old enough to remember Amsterdam) but that might just have been a bad joke.
Nevertheless I submit that the Clint Eastwood bit worked absolutely perfectly for the GOP in general and Mitt Romney in particular. Here is why:
1. The Presence:
A lot of people who normally wouldn’t have tuned into the RNC yesterday tuned in to see Eastwood.
2. The oddity of it:
If it was a regular “Make my Day” speech they would have changed the channel when it was done, this was so odd that I suspect people kept the TV there just to see what people might say about it or if there was any odd reaction.
3. The memorable lines:
Because Eastwood bit was so odd, the memorable lines “Politicians are employees of ours”, “When somebody does not do the job, you gotta let ‘em go.” stood out and will be remembered.
4. The lead-in:
Those folks who stayed looking for Eastwood reactions who normally would have gone caught Marco Rubio, who hit it out of the park for Romney and he gave a speech that would hold them.
5. The Comparison:
The Mitt Romney speech contrasted to the Eastwood bit was a smashing success.
6. Drawing their fire:
Take a look at this image from Memeorandum as of 8:31 AM
And here is the stuff on the Romney speech same page:
What is Missing? Attacks on Romney’s speech! Today was the day that the Democrats should be hitting Romney’s speech and trying to counter it a-la Ryan. Instead the readers of the Morning papers, Cable TV and the left blogs are reading attacks on Eastwood. Clint Eastwood is playing the same role as a hero in an old western, drawing all the fire so the good guy could escape unharmed.
7. Picking on an old man:
The left has been particularly strong hitting Clint Eastwood, Here are three images from Twitchy
Not only is it not smart to hit an American Icon, what do you think the reaction of the elderly voters who always show up will be to the “pick on the old guy” bit? I suspect it won’t play well at all.
For tall these reasons Clint Eastwood appearance at the RNC made my day and I suspect it made the Romney campaign’s day too.
Cross-Posted from Datechguy’s Blog
Heritage: We Can Change America’s Course

Originally posted @ The Foundry by Amy Payne
Entering the final stretch of the presidential contest, Americans are facing a monumental choice. The American people will decide the direction of government and its role in their lives for the coming years.
The debate in Tampa this week raised a number of issues, including preserving the American dream of working hard to achieve success. The Heritage Foundation has extensive research and policy prescriptions on each of these issues:
Energy: America needs to end energy subsidies and restore a free market in the energy sector. We can and should develop our domestic energy sources in an environmentally responsible way. Go to Energy & Environment
School choice: America’s education focus should be our students. The best way to serve the needs of a diverse population is to give families the freedom to choose a school—public, private, charter, or home school—that best fits their children’s needs. See where your state stands
Free trade: America needs jobs, and promoting free trade is an excellent way to create high-quality jobs in America. We should have a free flow of goods, services, and investments between democratic nations. Catch up on the U.S. free trade record
The federal budget: Tackling the federal budget is a complex task, but it must be done. Heritage’s Saving the American Dream plan details ideas for reforming major entitlement programs, permanently balancing the budget, and reducing the national debt. See the Heritage plan
Tax reform: America’s families and businesses need tax relief. A tax cut here and there isn’t enough; we need fundamental tax reform. A tax system that is simple and fair would spur economic growth and protect those at the bottom of the income ladder. How it could be done
Repealing Obamacare: Obamacare doesn’t stop with government intrusion into your relationship with your doctor. It also raises taxes, adds to the U.S. deficit, and attacks religious and personal freedoms. Top 5 Reasons to Repeal Obamacare
Reforming Medicare: Medicare reform is not an option—it is a necessity. To keep the program working for those it is designed to help, we should give seniors more control over their health care decisions and guarantee better access to quality care. The way forward for Medicare
Next week, the debate will continue in Charlotte, and more policy issues may enter the mix.
There’s no way to predict how the election will turn out. But as Heritage’s Matt Spalding has written, “it will be a turning point in American history: Either our leaders will guide the country even further along the road to ‘progressivism’ or they will begin a long, slow turn back toward the principles of the American Founding.”
“The federal government has acquired an all but unquestioned dominance over virtually every area of American life,” Spalding says. “It acts without constitutional limits and is restricted only by expediency, political will, and (less and less) budget constraints.”
The Heritage Foundation recently published Changing America’s Course, which gives our political leaders recommendations on how to stay within the limits of the Constitution.
To put America on a path toward preserving and growing freedom, Spalding says, “The first step is to reduce the size and scope of government and unleash the engines of economic productivity and the institutions of cultural renewal.”
It is possible to change America’s course.








