Debate Question for Obama: What Discernible Benefit Does The U.S. Derive From Your Relationship With Robert Roche?

debate question

Nobody has more access to Obama, Biden and Hillary than Robert Roche, yet he is completely unknown to the public.  As Steve Bannon notes on Breitbart today, and as the NY Post reported yesterday, Roche’s dealings are strictly in China, all his employees are Chinese and he needs good contacts with the government there to do business.  Yet Roche, a bundler for Obama who owns the web site Obama.com which directs a lot of foreign traffic to Obama’s donation page – a page that DOES NOT have the common security measures to prevent illegal, foreign donations – sits between Obama and Hillary at the head table during the state dinner for Hu Jintao.  He sits with Biden in high level trade meetings in Shanghai (pictures confirming this are in both stories below). Tonight is the foreign policy debate and China is as big an issue as any.  Again, what does the U.S. get out of this relationship, or is this access – to the most powerful players in the administration — simply a reward for raising a lot of money, and is that money all legally raised?  Perhaps someone should ask Obama or members of his administration if they have answers to these questions.

Related articles:

Breitbart, this morning: A Cancer at the Center of the Presidency: Robert Roche a Chinese Agent-Of-Influence?

Sunday, New York Post: PAPER: Obama’s Blind Eye to Illegal Donors…

1 Person Recommended This