Heritage: Questions You’re Asking About Cakes, Gays, and Religious Freedom

Heritage: Questions You’re Asking About Cakes, Gays, and Religious Freedom

Cases have been popping up across the country where individuals have declined to bake cakes or take photos for same-sex wedding ceremonies—and government has punished them. This week, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer (R) vetoed a bill that would have put religious liberty protections in place in her state. We sat down with Ryan Anderson, Heritage’s William E. Simon Fellow in Religion and a Free Society, to get some answers about this debate.

The Foundry: How did people’s beliefs about same-sex marriage become an issue for private businesses?

Ryan Anderson: In New Mexico, a photographer declined to use her artistic talents to promote a same-sex ceremony because of her religious beliefs. The couple complained and the New Mexico Human Rights Commission ordered her to pay a fine of nearly $7,000. Christian adoption and foster-care agencies in Massachusetts, Illinois, and Washington, D.C., have been forced to stop providing those services because they believe that the best place for kids is with a married mom and dad. Other cases include a baker, a florist, a bed-and-breakfast, a student counselor, the Salvation Army, and more.

Whose liberty is at stake? Is it just business owners’?

Everyone’s. When the government starts forcing people to do things that violate their deeply held beliefs, we have a problem. Unless the government proves that there is a compelling government interest in doing so (and that there was not another, less restrictive means possible), citizens should be left free. We need legislation protecting religious liberty for all, because in a growing number of cases, government coercion and penalties have violated religious freedom.

Why is this a religious liberty issue?

Many religions teach that marriage is the union of a man and woman, and the religious liberty concern in these recent cases is that people are being coerced into violating that belief. While Americans are legally free to live and love as they choose, no one should demand that government coerce others into participating in activities that violate their sincerely held religious beliefs.

But isn’t government supposed to guarantee equal treatment for all?

These are cases of private individuals offering (or not offering) their services, not government officially recognizing same-sex relationships—which is another case altogether. There is no need for government to try to force every photographer and every florist to service every marriage-related event.

Would laws like these open the door to lots of businesses discriminating against gays and lesbians?

Claims that proposals like Arizona’s encourage refusing service to gays and lesbians are simply nonsensical. Arizona’s proposed legislation never even mentioned same-sex couples or sexuality; it simply clarified and improved existing state protections for religious liberty.

Some people have claimed, for example, that it meant a pharmacy could refuse to serve gays and lesbians. But I know of no sincere religious belief that says you can’t sell penicillin to someone because they are gay or lesbian. Ensuring that all citizens have access to crucial medical care is a compelling government interest. And requiring every pharmacy to sell penicillin might very well be the least restrictive means possible of ensuring access.

What about people whose religions say different things, or Americans who choose not to practice a religion?

These types of freedom protections are important for all Americans. As Cato’s Ilya Shapiro put it, “For that matter, gay photographers and bakers shouldn’t be forced to work religious celebrations…and environmentalists shouldn’t be forced to work job fairs in logging communities.” When it comes to this particular issue, all Americans should remain free to believe and act in the public square based on their beliefs about marriage without fear of government penalty.

 

Get Free Email Updates!

Signup Now to Receive Updates and Alerts!

We will never give away, trade or sell your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time.

@stevenfoley

A former U.S.Marine, he is the Creator of The Minority Report Network. He is also the Founder and Managing Editor of the Network’s flagship site, www.theminorityreportblog.com, Former Director of New Media for Liberty.com, Former Director of New Media for Liberty First PAC, and the Former Chief Managing Editor of 73Wire.com. Steve is a well respected national conservative blogger who’s dedicated the past several years of his life advancing conservatism online. Recently Steve was instrumental in the development of Liberty.com, Liberty First PAC, The Patriot Caucus, the national campaign trail and grassroots news site73wire.com.

More in

israeli funny israeli ad-3

Oy Vey! Compose Your Own Caption!

Streetwise_ITJul 28, 2015
071515-HOMELESS-GRACIE-DM-29    'Homeless Man' Kevin Fasick standing in front of Gracie Mansion, East End Ave. and East 88th Street, NYC. David McGlynn 7/15/15

New York City- Squeegee Man Is Back

Streetwise_ITJul 28, 2015
image-386.jpg

Fox News Makes Wild Claim About Donald Trump Some Won’t Believe

Michael BeckerJul 28, 2015
903

Why PayPal’s Independence Will Have A Huge Effect On Your Business

Candice LanierJul 28, 2015
image-388.jpg

Okay, so it’s not a Chinese Tank They’re Staring Down, but it’s a start.

Michael BeckerJul 28, 2015
image-387.jpg

Trump Lowers the BOOM on Hillary and (SURPRISE!) Doesn’t Hold Back [VIDEO]

Michael BeckerJul 28, 2015

The Minority Report is a network of websites devoted to Conservative & Libertarian politics in the United States. In 2014 the network had over 20 million page views!

On this site you'll find posts & links to some of the best and most comprehensive center-right news and opinion on the net...

February 2014
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Archives

Copyright © 2014 The Minority Report Network