A Tale of Two Cities on a Hill: The Republican Party at a Cross Roads

Tagged:

Promoted - well done, ace. - DocJ

The Republican Party is at a crossroads. The first path leads to Ronald Reagan’s shining city on a hill, the other to the Democrat’s dark, dingy and socialist city upon a very different hill. The first way has been articulated in a recent speech by Representative Mike Pence at the Annual Silver Elephant Dinner in South Carolina, the other way has been articulated by several Republicans of late including Representative Tom Cole on Fox News Sunday last week, Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels at the Fund for American Studies annual conference in mid April and others pushing the Party leftward.

Representative Pence makes a compelling case that the current minority status of the Republican Party is a consequence of the Party’s abandonment of first principles:

Quote:
It’s good to know where we’ve been and what we’ve done.

It reminds us of the things that brought us to the place we are today, and in some measure, foretells our tomorrows.

Republicans would do well to think about where we’ve been…and what we’ve done as we ponder the way forward.

And that’s why I’m here: to talk about the future of conservatism. But to do that, we must look back a bit. As I said, I’m not much of a photographer in the artistic sense, but I do know how to keep things in focus.

A lot of people want to write the obituary for the Grand Old Party in 2008 but I believe the reports of our demise are “greatly exaggerated”.

I believe that conservatism will continue to define American politics in the new century as much as it did in the last.

But when I look back at Election Day 2006, I am convinced that we are in the most perilous and yet the most promising time in the history of our party.

It is a perilous time because we have wandered into the wilderness.

It is a promising time, because every great political movement in our history has come out of the wilderness.

The late William F. Buckley, Jr. often admonished that “despair is a mortal sin” and I do not invite it, but the facts are not encouraging.

The Republican Party lost control of Congress in 2006. And in the three special elections in Republican districts this year, Democrats have won every time. And every national poll shows our president and our party at historic lows. We are in the wilderness.

But there is a way out. The author Mark Helprin wrote, “the way out of the wilderness is the truth; recognizing it, stating it, defending it, living by it”. Here’s the truth as I see it.

I believe the Republicans in Washington did not just lose our Majority; I believe we lost our way.

After 1994, we were a Majority committed to a balanced federal budget, entitlement reform and advancing the principles of a limited federal government.

In recent years, our Majority voted to expand the federal government’s role in education by nearly 100 percent, created the largest new entitlement in forty years, and pursued spending policies that created record deficits and national debt.

This was not in the Contract with America.

Now, our opponents will say that the American people rejected our Republican vision.

But I say the American people did not quit on the Contract with America -- we did.

We walked away from the limited government principles that minted the Republican Congress. And the American people walked away from us.

To start our way back, to find our way out of this wilderness, we have to admit that Republicans are in trouble for a reason.

And it has nothing to do with Democrat spin or their vague campaign generalities about hope and change and liberal utopia. It’s about Republicans forgetting what they believe and why they believe it. It’s about Republicans acting like Democrats.

At this Silver Elephant, it saddens me to say that our sterling symbol is tarnished, certainly not by the good conservatives in this room and across the nation. You are the heart and soul of this party.

It has been tarnished by those who abandoned principle for power and cost this party both.

In the name of "governing" and "compassion", our party in Washington has become what we replaced.

The time has come to say at last...the era of Big Government Republicanism is over!

And the good news is, while Republicans may be losing ground, our conservative agenda is still winning!

After that I’m thinking that if the McCain people aren’t considering Pence for VP, I want to know why not and how long will it take to pull their heads out! I realize it’s not a good idea to pick a VP based on a speech, but if this is truly what Pence believes and this is what we can expect from him…I’m on his wagon as of now!

Anyway, this path to Reagan’s “Shining City on a Hill” is contrasted by our current leadership on the hill in several ways.

First is the state of denial that is pervasive amongst our representatives and party leadership in Washington. Have they learned the lessons of 2006? Has Cole gotten the message I discussed in my resent Red State post: Smack Down Of Tom Cole At NRCC Blog Is Up To 2035 Posts! Did Congressional Republicans Get The Message?

Consider this gem from Representative Cole in an exchange with Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday after Wallace refers to recent polls showing Republicans trailing in generic polls 50% to 30% and asks how bleak are Republican prospects this year:

Quote:
Well, we've got a challenging landscape, no doubt about it, Chris. But I think the fall elections are fundamentally different than a series of specials.
We actually, if you'll recall, won all the special elections in 2006 and then got our clock cleaned pretty good at the end of the year. So I think once we're in a presidential year, the dynamic changes and we'll be in a lot stronger position.

Challenging landscape? Ya think? “the fall elections are fundamentally different than a series of specials”? Really? I wouldn’t expect him to say anything else but these were no ordinary losses. These loses involved so called “Safe” districts where Republicans don’t lose!

Sure, the Dems beat us by running Conservative candidates which Pence pointedly addresses in his speech:

Quote:
Just a few weeks ago, in Louisiana and Mississippi, Democrats who articulated platforms of pro-life, pro-gun and anti-taxes beat their Republican opponents -- in solidly Republican districts. And in 2006, in district after district, many of the seats we lost went to those who articulated a conservative message.

This wasn’t coincidence. Democrats handpicked their candidates for those races precisely because they knew the power of the conservative message.

We will only defeat the Democrat agenda by presenting a positive, conservative message in vivid contrast to the thinly veiled liberalism of the new Democratic majority.

If I could speak directly to Cole, I’d ask, “if we can’t win special elections in these three districts Mr. Cole….How are we going to win in Purple districts”? Oh and another question, “Mr. Cole, “What is the Republican Party currently doing to recruit Conservative candidates in other districts so we don’t get out Conservatived by the Liberal Democrats”?

Then Cole throws out the usual, “well, we’re not as bad as the Dem Congress” by pointing to the high negatives for Pelosi and Company and talks about how we have a great chance to contrast with them! Are you kidding me? They had their chance to contrast themselves with the Dems by upholding Bush’s veto of the Farm Bill! Did they? More on that later! &@#$ idiots!

Pence continues his speech with an eloquent description of his dresser top and explains how the things most important to us belong in this place of prominence in our lives and asks what is the current state of the Republican dresser.

Quote:
What’s on our party’s dresser?

These days, it’s hard to tell beneath the clutter. The Republican dresser has become a catchall, a landing place for the accumulated stuff of the day’s work and activities: Piles of change, money clips and receipts, mementos of the day’s spending. The meaningful reminders of the homeowners are barely visible, dusty and overcome by the clutter of expediency and politics. They’re there, but you have to look hard to see them.

But you know what they are.... they’re what brought you here tonight...

I believe the cherished ideals on top of our dresser are life and liberty and limited government.

And I believe the future of our movement demand that we put them back front and center...

And make no mistake about it; I believe the future of conservatism begins with a commitment to the unalienable right to life. Without the right to life there is no right to liberty or property. Our party must be willing to stand for the unborn and commit to appointing justices to the Supreme Court who will consign Roe v. Wade to the ash heap of history.

And I believe the future of conservatism demands that we stand for the font of life: traditional marriage. Marriage was ordained by God and instituted in law. It is the glue of the American family and the safest harbor to raise children and it must be defended.

And I believe the future of conservatism demands that we stand with those who defend our liberty at home regardless of what the polls or the pundits tell us to do. Whether the national media will ever admit it, freedom is winning in Iraq. We must take the fight over Iraq to the opposition and tell the American people the truth. Thanks to our Commander in Chief and tens of thousands of our men and women in uniform, the surge is working, Al Qaeda is on the run, and Operation Iraqi Freedom is a widening American success.

And I believe the future of conservatism demands that we defend our liberties at home by opposing censorship, whether it takes the form of the so-called Fairness Doctrine or takes the form of Campaign Finance Reform. Our freedom to speak and listen to who we want when we want is a blood-bought American right. We must not permit the Democrats to bring back the so-called Fairness Doctrine.

And the future of our movement demands that we defend our economic liberty and stand for the free market, whether in the freedom of Americans to engage in international trade or the freedom of parents to choose whatever public or private school their children will attend. Conservatives know government has no place standing in the way of commerce or standing in the school house door barring exit to poor children from our most dangerous and failing schools.

And the future of our movement demands that we stand for economic liberty and fight for energy independence. We must confront the environmental Left and give the American people more access to American oil! The American people need to know that one party wants America to tax our way to lower oil prices and one party wants America to drill our way to lower oil prices

And lastly, I believe that we must return our party to the principled practice of limited government. We must again be the party of a balanced federal budget that lives within its means by instituting spending discipline and pro-growth tax relief. We must embrace entitlement reform built on Lincoln’s adage that government not do for a man ‘what he can and should do for himself’.

And our candidates must be willing to expose the Democrats’ plan to pass the largest tax increase in American history, explode government spending and over-regulate our economy in the name of climate change.

Life, Liberty and Limited Government-these are the cherished ideals atop the dresser of our party and this movement.

And these are the ideals to which we must return.

It’s time to clear the dresser.

Its time to get back to standing for the things that matter most to our party and our nation.

If that doesn’t stir your blood you’re brain dead or a Dummycrat, (is that an oxymoron?)! Pence would get my vote for VP and later President for his comment on Campaign Finance alone! He’s the only Republican that I’ve heard mention it since it was foisted on us with GWBs signature and the SCOTUS.s twisted reasoning! Our nominee and his championing of this legislation aside, repeal of CFR should be a central plank of the Republican Party Platform and the Party should be aggressively campaigning on repealing its more draconian restrictions on free speech!

Again Contrast the above goals with Cole’s defense of his vote along with 99 other Republicans to override the President’s veto of the 2008 Three Hundred Billion Dollar Farm Bill after Wallace challenges him based on his and Congressional Republicans lack of fiscal discipline and override of GWB’s veto of the 300 Billion Dollar Farm Bill:

Quote:
Well, first of all, Chris, every spending fight we've had this Congress with the Democrats has been because they wanted to spend more, not less. So I think we're on the right side of the spending battle.

WALLACE: But you voted with them to spend more this time in the farm bill.

COLE: Well, if you'll let me finish my answer, on the farm bill, it actually came back spending less money than the farm bill that all of us had voted against a few weeks earlier, and without the tax increase provisions in it.

The president holding tough, frankly, made it a much better bill than it would have been. But at the end of the day, we thought getting something done — at least those of my colleagues who voted with me thought getting something done for farm country was extraordinarily important.

And this bill actually costs less, had put income limitations for the first time and, frankly, had no tax increases in it, which the earlier bills did. So we thought it was a marked improvement…

Do what? “…on the farm bill, it actually came back spending less money than the farm bill that all of us had voted against a few weeks earlier, and without the tax increase provisions in it.”? Again Mr. Cole…are you serious? So now we have Republican Leaders in the House of Representatives defending increased spending because we didn’t increase it as much as the Democrats wanted? And did you actually say the increases in the welfare provisions in the Farm Bill were a good thing?

Then there’s this pearl of wisdom:

Quote:
The question always is are you going to do better by cutting the deal now or going forward.

Why “cut the deal now”? Had you upheld GWB’s veto you’d have gotten more cuts in the program or Pelosi and Reid would have had to answer the tough questions you are now facing because it would have been the Democrats who were the only ones pushing for increased spending. By voting for the override, Pelosi gets a free ride and avoids the big spending label because you have made yourself the focus of the angst of the American People by helping to pass a bill which wouldn’t have passed without you!

Pence goes on to reference Buckly and Reagan:

Quote:
For years, the late William F. Buckley, Jr. carried a keychain that was inscribed with the words, “don’t just do something, stand there.

Buckley knew-when we stand on conservative values, Americans stand with our party.

As Ronald Reagan told CPAC in 1975, "A political party cannot be all things to all men. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs, which must not be compromised to political expediency, or to simply swell its numbers.”

Buckley was right.

Reagan was right.

The way back to a Republican Majority is to the Right.”

Contrast this with the comments from, Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels and others in our party that lecture us that it’s time we get over Ronald Reagan.

Pence finishes with an appeal to the vision of the founders for this country and a return to what the GOP has always stood for:

Quote:
Make no mistake about it, these are perilous days for the Grand Old Party, but as I said at the outset, I also believe they are days of promise and opportunity. And I still have hope.

But my hope is not built on the promises of politicians or parties.

During this campaign season, the American people keep hearing that if they only “believe” -- if they only have “hope” -- then they will get “change they can believe in”.

But most Americans know better than that.

The change America needs is one which leans upon the tried and true principles of our founding -- and the hope which America has is built upon the One who blessed its birth.

Benjamin Franklin shared a basic understanding of our founding fathers when he said, “The longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth: 'that God governs in the affairs of men.' And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid?”

And I would ask my countrymen, ‘is it probable that a nation or a political party be renewed without His aid?”

So I say, to move forward, we must acknowledge, as did our founders; that political movements may "grow tired and weary" and they may “stumble and fall”.

But, as has ever been true for every generation of Americans, "they that wait upon the Lord will renew their strength”. “They will mount up on wings like eagles. They will run and not grow weary”

Men and women of this movement let us seize upon this moment in history.

Let us renew our commitment to life, liberty and limited government.

Let us embrace the champion that history has chosen for us

And let us ever depend on Him who set this miracle of democracy on these wilderness shores.

And if we do that I believe that today’s clouds of peril for our party will break and the dawn of a new day -- a day of promise and opportunity will light our way.

Because every time our people have humbly taken the cause of life, liberty and limited government to the throne of grace, throughout American history-Freedom always wins.

I left out Pence’s case for electing McCain in 2008 partly because of the size of this post and because I think a comparison of McCain with Winston Churchill is a stretch. This is an omission for which I will no doubt be criticized, but I can take it. :>) That being said, I would recommend going to the links I’ve provided above and reading this speech. I’d also recommend going to Fox News to view Cole’s performance last week, the video is even more pathetic than it reads!

Also posted at Redstate

http://www.redstate.com/blogs/aceintx/2008/jun/03/a_tale_of_two_cities_on_a_hill_the_republican_party_at_a_cross_roads

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
David Hinz's picture

What is so darn hard to understand about the fact that when Republicans talk like conservatives, and then back that talk by acting like conservatives, they win elections.

When they talk like conservatives, then go out and spend like liberals, they lose.

When they talk like moderates (Democrat-lite) and give people no reason to believe that they will act like conservatives, they lose.

When Democrats talk like conservatives, even if they are NOT conservative (SEE: William J Clinton, 1992), they win.

DocJ's picture

Problem is, there are so few role-model examples of talking the walk and walking the talk that it seems to get lost on the Critters once the K-Street gang get their talons into them.

Then it starts being all about "going back to Washington" - and "Washington" convinces them, over time, that the way to keep coming back is, well, the other white meat.

And you know what? It works like a charm for a while. But only for a while - until people are, again, given a choice between a Democrat and a Democrat... And we all know how that turns out.

It doesn't help that our side has the harder job - after all, conservatives are only invested in government to the extent that they/we get mugged by it every payday. Whereas for liberals, government - and it's never ending expansion - is the end-all-be-all of existence. And so, they invest heavily - in time, talent and money - to it's expansion, leaving our side left to play defense with a far less invested constituency. Add to that the fact that deep in the heart of every liberal lives a social worker looking to "do good" and WHAM! - a tailor-made system for the liberals, to be sure.

---------
Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock.

aceintx's picture

I just don't know how we can do it since we're not in Congress and don't vote with the caucus!

CFR, Amnesty, Spending, Corruption,
Earmarks, Socialized Medicine, Global Cap & Trade:

”Your Silence Is Your Consent!”

BlackMaverick's picture

Support Conservatives when they run in every single state, and support them in primaries. How did the SC, for example, the state which gave us Sanford and Demint for instance, give us Limp wristed Lindsey? We need to stand and fight for our own, and not be afraid to go after the middle. Not to mention the fact that you can be a conservative without being completey socially conservative, such as myself (though I am pro-life, pro-gun, and pro-American exceptionalism). A Guiliani who loves to hit the Democrats and relishes being a Republican makes me much happier than a certain presidential candidate who gets the most excited when attacking Senators of his own Party from the greatest State in the Union. Fight to move red states ruby red and blue states purple. Romney and Guiliani moved their states to the Right-we need to move Right everywhere possible. ed states deep red and blue states purple. That means we move Right, not necessarily all the way, but as far to the Right as electorally possible.

The trouble with our friend John McCain isn't that he's ignorant, it just that he knows so much that isn't so.