Burning Down My Master’s House-Obama and the Democratic Party’s lies we can believe in

Tagged:

There has been a lot of talk about race and identity politics during this campaign, perhaps more than any other political campaign in history. The media and pundits are showing this election as a classic case of the old America vs. the new America, the crusty old white guy against the young, hip, cosmopolitan Black candidate. However, this is not a blog about the media’s tingle in the leg that they get for Obama, or even the Obamessiah himself. I want to talk about Obama’s hopeandchangeandhopeandchange and their effects on Obama’s supposed base of the urban poor. And so because I love a political fistfight like John Edwards loves his campaign staffers, I would like to take this opportunity to take on Senator Hopeandchange in his own arena, which is change from the way things are traditionally done in Washington. It has been revealed that in every arena from his policies to his rhetoric to his Vice President, that Obama is nothing more than the same socialist candidate with the same failed policies from the 1960s that the Democrats trot out every year to run for president, fire up their base and leave on the short end of the stick, howling about disenfranchisement and stolen votes.

Many of my friends have asked me why I cannot support Obama. I am not driven by social issues, and indeed I would even say I am socially liberal. And after all, what’s wrong with change? That my friends, is a fair and accurate question that ought to be posed to the Senator himself. Since Obama clinched the nomination, he has been running for his life towards the political center, seeking to grasp the same independent right leaning voters that have eluded the Democrats for five out of the last seven elections. But one would think that the Boy Wonder could win simply with his base of young and Black voters just as his did in the primaries, especially considering that these were the only two groups that bought into his message that he was going to be different from every other politician. However, when he talks, the only change that Obama is delivering is the skin color of the man delivering the same message.

When looking at his policies concerning education, Obama does not support school vouchers. He tows the Democratic Party line that more funding is needed, always more funding, while ignoring the fact that high needs schools have gotten better funding than at any other point in their history. Ignoring the success that charter schools private schools have had on African-American males, a significant part of Obama’s base, he chooses to tow the line of the party. Sounds like Washington to me if I’ve ever read it.

When looking as his policies on energy, the economy, and Iraq, once again Obama sounds like every other politician. Save the environment, tax the rich (who are always you) and bring all the troops home, consequences be damned. Of course, I’d be lying if I said those were Obama’s positions today-those were his positions when he was running against Hillary Clinton. Theses are his positions now that he’s running against McCain/Palin-I’d look into offshore drilling, there needs to be tax cuts for the middle class, and I’d look into hearing what the generals on the ground say about Iraq (which is a good thing, since Obama’s only been once since his nomination, three times overall and is about as qualified to speak on Iraq as he is to be president.) Talk about being for something before you were against it; Obama has gone through positions on the issues this election like Joe Biden goes through speeches that he didn’t write. What’s next-is he going to give hunting lessons to all of those people who were bitterly clinging to their God and their guns?

We all know about the famous rhetoric of the Obamessiah, but the funny thing about it all is how he attempts to define himself as different, a new kind of politician when he is very much the same liberal elite snob just like the rest of his party. Someone who claims to take the high road as a new politician however, wouldn’t be caught up in the Chicago machine and mixed up with mobsters and crooks like Tony Rezko, who helped Obama purchase his house in the wealthy Hyde Park community on Chicago’s South Side. This is just the tip of the iceberg on Obama’s supposedly new politics. Who did he pick for his Vice President-not someone who would reinforce his message of change. Not someone who had been on board with him on the issues-he picked Senator Joe Plagiarism Biden, a man who has been in Washington for over 30 years. That’s change? A 30 year Senator who voted for the War and called your Iraq plan gravely irresponsible? Senator, what happened to hope? What happened to change? Or did they get in the way of your real slogan-power, by any means necessary.

I have always believed that the Democratic Party leadership was full of liars and hypocrites, people who would say anything to get elected. I used to think that this was personified in the Clintons, and watching Obama send the Clintons to their political death was a moment of great joy and satisfaction to me. However, right now Obama is the greatest threat to youth and African-Americans, his two core groups and the groups that will die with him to the very end of this bloody cage match. I titled this burning down my master’s house because as a Black male generally you are born into Democratic politics-the same mentality that had slaves trapped and afraid to leave the reservation even after they were free has blacks afraid to leave a Democratic Party that takes the African-American vote every four years and leaves them with absolutely nothing. So my solution is to burn the whole damn thing down-destroy the Democratic Party and call them out as the faithless, gutless cowards that they are. Obama can and must be questioned and exposed as the America hating messiah that he truly is. Someone who does not need to wear a flag lapel pin, that has a wife who does not love her country, and has friends in the mob and in the Weather Underground is not someone who should be in charge of holding the nukes and protecting the American people. Obama has already shown that when the going gets tough in times of war, he will fold like a used chair. Once again, this is the same tendencies that all of the cut and run Democrats (which is all Democrats sans Lieberman) have shown; if it is a tough fight, we will wave the white flag. Obama will embolden and strengthen our enemies, between his willingness to meet with terrorist leaders and enemies of the state (something that his vice president once Joe Biden called gravely irresponsible) and his belief that we should give all illegal aliens drivers licenses (what you thought we forgot about that one Barry?), Obama has shown countless times t hat he cannot be trusted with our national security, and far from being a change candidate on national security, he gives us the same Democratic Party French foreign policy.

Fortunately, where there is darkness, there is a light, because there is another man running for President, believe it or not, who has a history of acting on real change. John McCain has been the corrupt pork barrelers worst enemy, calling out members of his own party and the other party, accepting $0 in earmarks, and being a hawk on fiscal spending. John McCain, unlike Obama supports the right of young people to save and invest tour own money in private accounts, rather than raising the payroll tax as Obama advocates to continue to pay for a Social Security program that we will never receive benefits for. John McCain advocates cutting wasteful spending and look at revamping our fiscal budget, rather that continuing to throw money at things such as the education system which have borne no fruits. And just as important, John McCain has cultivated this great image with the selection of the governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin as his running mate. While Obama succumbs to the corruption of the Illinois and Chicago political organizations, Palin has made her political name by fighting against the corruption in her own Party and in the Democratic Party. She has made enemies in Alaska by fighting for ethics reform and the fact that she spent time as a mayor and a governor gives her more executive experience than anyone on the Democratic side of the ticket, especially when the top of that ticket spent his four years in the Senate writing books and running for President. McCain and Palin advocate offshore drilling as well as looking into nuclear energy (and finally entering the US into the 21st century). This is a real ticket of change-this is Americas winning ticket for the future. Lower gas prices, money back in the pockets of Americans, and tax and spending cuts-now that’s change we can all really believe in.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
David Hinz's picture

I love your line:

Quote:

And so because I love a political fistfight like John Edwards loves his campaign staffers, I would like to take this opportunity to take on Senator Hopeandchange in his own arena, which is change from the way things are traditionally done in Washington.

Brutal! But I love it. Yeah, it does appear that hopeandchange has taken a backseat to businessasusual, doesn't it. I love his accusation that Sen McCain has voted with President Bush and his policies 90% of the time, while neglecting to mention that Sen Obama himself, has voted the partisan Democrat line just short of ALWAYS!

And:

Quote:

I titled this burning down my master’s house because as a Black male generally you are born into Democratic politics-the same mentality that had slaves trapped and afraid to leave the reservation even after they were free has blacks afraid to leave a Democratic Party that takes the African-American vote every four years and leaves them with absolutely nothing. So my solution is to burn the whole damn thing down-destroy the Democratic Party and call them out as the faithless, gutless cowards that they are.

I'd love to bring the matches, but it appears to me that you and I are not needed. The Democratic Party is doing an admirable job of destroying themselves through infighting squabbles and hateful self-loathing.

Women supporters of Hillary are organizing for Sen McCain because they feel the coronation nomination was stolen from her, while Hispanic Democrats are less than enthusiastic over a black presidential candidate. Reliable Jewish Democrats are peeling away from Sen Obama due to his perceived support for Hamas and other Arab organizations, and his lukewarm support for Israel.

The Democrats are setting fires all over the plantation, and some of them are already threatening the mansion.

c17wife's picture

my friend.
Is this on RS? I am havng so much trouble on the site that I think I am missing something.
Dude, you rocked the house with this one.
Spread it far and wide.
As Buzz would say-5s...to infinity and beyond.

Your money quote is right here-

....I titled this burning down my master’s house because as a Black male generally you are born into Democratic politics-the same mentality that had slaves trapped and afraid to leave the reservation even after they were free has blacks afraid to leave a Democratic Party that takes the African-American vote every four years and leaves them with absolutely nothing. So my solution is to burn the whole damn thing down-destroy the Democratic Party and call them out as the faithless, gutless cowards that they are.

Very well said.

BlackMaverick's picture

I posted it at 2AM. But to be honest, I'm liking TMR more and more especially with the intimate group thats been there since the beginning is all over here. It's nice to talk about this among all of you guys. The more I look, the more I see not just Obama but the entire party as the biggest impediment to true freedom in American society.

"My worse fears had come to pass not in Georgia, but in Washington, D.C., where I was being pursued not by bigots in white robes but by left-wing zealots draped in flowing sanctimony."-The Honorable Justice Clarence Thomas

c17wife's picture

there today and decided against it due to the fervor over the Palin pick, the fact that the site crashes on me CONSTANTLY, and I'm lazy.
I love TMR!
Now, if I could only get it to let me use a password for more than one log-in. :>)
And...where did my palm tree go? My picture is gone and everything. Whaaa!

About those dems. They are an embarrassment to me now. I simply can not take one Democrat elected official serious anymore. Not.A.One.

Here lately our kids have started the "I can't" whining and hubby gives them this line...
"You are an Amer-I-Can, so you can do anything you put your mind to."

Too bad the democrats want us all to whine "I Can't" and say only "Yes We Can". Like we are all a bunch of victims. ACK!

c17wife's picture

so slightly and re-post it on Tuesday.
It is something EVERYONE should read.

David Hinz's picture

bring your friends :-)

speciallist's picture

"40 million American households that read TMR are generally happier
than those people in households that don't read TMR."

David Hinz's picture

and gave up -- besides we have just as much fun here...

You remind me so much of a dear friend with whom I co-blog on HangRight.

Quote:
as a Black male generally you are born into Democratic politics-the same mentality that had slaves trapped and afraid to leave the reservation even after they were free has blacks afraid to leave a Democratic Party that takes the African-American vote every four years and leaves them with absolutely nothing.

Growing up in the WV mountains you get the same feeling. Rockefeller, Byrd, and a multitude of underlings across numerous counties, ruled that state with iron claws for so many decades that I believe the people still don't realize they don't have to live that way anymore, although they may be coming out of that mentality now, slowly but surely.

In that sense, you might celebrate Obama's ascendency to the nomination because the Democrats brand of identity politics has become translucent and can no longer hide the fact that the core is empty, as is the mansion that Mr. Hinz mentioned being threatened with the fires all over the plantation.

Let it burn. We'll be here to help you and them chart a new and greater life.

aceintx's picture

Behind Every Good Man is a Greater Woman!!!

David Hinz's picture

It was an oversight, which I just corrected.

Promoted to the Front Page

speciallist's picture

"40 million American households that read TMR are generally happier
than those people in households that don't read TMR."

David Hinz's picture

are the things legends are made of...

speciallist's picture

Elections like this one make it even more fun

"40 million American households that read TMR are generally happier
than those people in households that don't read TMR."

David Hinz's picture

to blogworld in LV in sept

speciallist's picture

I just had my first and second practice....15..13 years olds...Games Every Sat. until Thankgiving and Tourny's till Christmas...I'm trying to get Red uni's..for real!

I'll have pics if we get the Red uni's....My teams have brought home 1st and 2nd place hardware in Newport 11-12 year/olds....now it's time for the older kids

"40 million American households that read TMR are generally happier
than those people in households that don't read TMR."

David Hinz's picture

a bunch of 13-year-olds or Steve and I? Besides, 13 is supposed to be an unlucky number -- do what the Chinese do -- lie about their ages...

speciallist's picture

than the Star Players....NO Authority....lol...I have to be creative with my discipline

"40 million American households that read TMR are generally happier
than those people in households that don't read TMR."

gamecock's picture

and that's saying a lot

"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson

tsulawmn's picture

Bravo! This is my first time here and yours was my first read. Right away I had to sign up. Great site and again I say Bravo ! I loved your post.

Steve Foley's picture

...you are welcome :0)

Steve Foley's picture

BlackMaverick's picture

I'm glad I inspired you. Welcome to the TMR family.

"My worse fears had come to pass not in Georgia, but in Washington, D.C., where I was being pursued not by bigots in white robes but by left-wing zealots draped in flowing sanctimony."-The Honorable Justice Clarence Thomas

aceintx's picture

though...;>)

Behind Every Good Man is a Greater Woman!!!

I wish that I could recommend this blog to my black students at the University that are all supporting Obama!

Unfortunately I can't, or I could lose my job.

And if we stop for a moment, get off our own partisan high horses, we all know this to be true. You are very accurate, my black brotha (yes, my people are descendants of slavery too), in your assessment of what has gotten the dems' tail handed to them in the recent national elections. In its attempt to be the people's party it has come to stand for nothing. Meanwhile, the GOP has been oh so masterful at fear mongering to the historical red states while being funded by the lobbyist and special interest groups that get them elected.

As a result many of the changes that our country needs will never be put forth by either party. We will continue to have an electoral college so that the small voice in Montana can carry almost as much weight as a voice in a much more populous state. Will we ever have a president elected by the popular vote?

We will continue to talk about welfare reform but never enact policies to truly reform it and get people off the roles--after all, you can not have rich people without poor people. Will we ever require welfare recipients to go to work two days a week doing something -- picking up the trash in the neighborhood for god's sake -- and then going to get some real life/job training so that they can get off the roles.

Will we ever incentivize companies to stop outsourcing and perhaps employ some of those folks with their newly learned skills thanks to a reformed welfare program? Maybe the answer is penalizing firms that go offshore and, de facto, help to increase unemployment and the costs to us taxpayers.

Perhaps we should impose greater duties on pharmaceuticals that leave the states and go overseas. I am not sure -- and pardon my self admitted ignorance -- but one can not wonder if this is one way in which countries with universal healthcare have such low/no priced drugs. We pay for their R&D with our high prices!

Lastly, I have just got to wonder, if providing a sound education to all is truly anyone's objective. When will we realize that unless we insure that parents know how to be parents, no amount of money in the world will fix our education challenges. My children attend the best public school in Illinois; a Chicago Public School. This school is successful not because of funding -- CPS have the same basic funding and our discretionary funding is the lowest in the city. The school is not successful because of small intimate classes -- we have 30+ kids in each room. It is not successful because all the white kids are compensating for the black kids -- the school is 65% black. It is successful because the parents are involved and are partners in education with the teachers. Most CPS do not have this luxury. Teachers are challenged to get parents to show to pick-up report cards let alone insure that homework is done.

We must insure that parents parent. But this might mean doing something very unpopular -- helping young girls realize that having a baby at 15 is no prize or rite of passage.

The result of all of the above might mean that the poor are less so and more self-sufficient, both of which may be unpopular objectives. Again, without the poor, their would be no rich -- or maybe the rich would be less rich.

speciallist's picture

and...it sounds like you don't have much faith...and you sound like your going conspiracy theory on us....and it sounds like your very angry....and this looks like something you have copied and you are going around pasting it to Righty blogs...or Lefty blogs where they love Angry dudes..

and you are probably a Drive by ....and not coming back...am I close??

"40 million American households that read TMR are generally happier
than those people in households that don't read TMR."

speciallist's picture

"40 million American households that read TMR are generally happier
than those people in households that don't read TMR."

David Hinz's picture

although I think you are way off base on some others. Please to not post headlines in all caps. On the internet that is considered shouting, and is considered rude. That is just a friendly piece of advice to help you stay friends with other bloggers.

I agree with you that children becoming parents is the major problem we have in this country -- and the major cause of poverty. The government cannot make children stop having children -- that has to come from the community. When I was growing up we had teen pregnancy -- and it was a stigma -- it was to be avoided and even though it sometimes happened, the fact that it WAS stigmatized prevented many children from engaging in underaged sex -- not because they didn't want to have sex, but because they were taught NOT to have sex. Imagine that -- and most of the time it worked.

We as a society did not throw up our hands and say, "Well we can't stop it, so we might as well pass out condoms." Government intervention is almost never the answer -- almost always the problem.

The idea that the rich MUST have poor, and so therefore keep people poor is sheer idiocy. First of all, the people striving to become rich, and the rich, get to be rich by (usually) finding a product or service to sell to others. They need a prosperous country to sell to, because there are simply not enough rich to simply sell to them. A prosperous middle class is necessary for Capitalism to work. POOR people don't buy goods and services -- they have no means. Poor people consume goods and services -- through government handouts, putting a burden on everyone else.

The liberal mantra believes that there is just so much wealth to go around, and therefore if someone else is getting rich, I must be getting poorer. That is a static way of looking at the world and is myopic. Wealth is created every day, and as some become wealthier, others benefit from their wealth. A man making $20,000 employs nobody -- is just making ends meet. However, if that guy is able, through hard work to make $200,000, he might well begin to employ others -- as gardeners or to paint or maintain his house. His wealth allows others to find work. If he is able to turn a business into something where he can make $2 million, now he will probably employ dozens of workers to expand his business. Is he exploiting those workers he employs?

The class-envy, the rich are keeping the poor down, populist rhetoric is just that rhetoric designed to divide the people into opposing camps by demagogic politicians.

speciallist's picture

I like the parents getting involved stuff..

"40 million American households that read TMR are generally happier
than those people in households that don't read TMR."

David Hinz's picture

but it is always worth trying to educate...

sorry to report, no drive by. i am a here for good.

David, my point which seems to have gotten lost, was that with an oozing band aid like our current welfare system, we will continue to have to over subsidize a segment of our population. It seems easier to just throw money at the problem rather than truly fix the problem. This is an example of a government program gone wrong. Of course there is enough wealth for all...I for one, truly enjoy the wealth that our family has and works hard to earn (it does put us in the top 1% in the US). I am just sick and tired of paying for programs and getting no ROI. Let's spend some of our money on killing folks to educating and getting them to be self-sufficient, working toward their own wealth.

David Hinz's picture

welcome to TMR, we hope you become an active member of the community.

Throwing money at the problem has always been the government solution -- or at least it has been throughout my lifetime. President Johnson brought us the Great Society and the War on Poverty. The programs destroyed the poor family, particularly hurting the minority family the hardest. Government became the father -- and it is a da** poor substitute. When it became obvious that the solutions were not working, the Federal government increased funding for the programs to make them work.

War on Drugs has been the same way. I believe it was President Reagan who once said, "The closest thing to eternity on earth is a government program." AMEN!

Steve and I have been attending the Conservative Leadership Conference in Las Vegas this weekend -- we shall be writing more in coming days about what we heard, what we learned and what we are going forward to do, but there are people trying to find solutions to the problems government has created. It is our job to get behind those solutions.

As the campaign is heating up, I have become an active participant on many of the blogs (and this is the first time that I have discussed the above...no cut and paste here). I do hope that I am able to figure out who will be the best president. I am often torn between my fiscal conservative and my socially liberal streak. I dream (perhaps PollyAnna-ish) that we can be a nation where folks who work hard can get there just rewards but also one that ensures that its people know how to fish and can take care of its offspring. I think we all want this.

Unfortunately, we are often so busy being Republican or Democratic, for the sake of the party, that we refuse to see the forrest for the trees. We have become a nation that argues ideology rather than issues. The House is focused on the election that is always less than two years away. This generally spawns a bunch of short-sighted softballs thrown at the issues that ensure re-election rather than solve the problems.

Don't get me wrong, I am not so naive as to suggest that our issues can be solved without money. And it may actually require more money, in the short term. However, I submit that the long term benefits of getting folks of the welfare roles, bringing jobs back on-shore, and teaching basic parenting skills will more than offset the short term costs. I wonder if any politician is willing to sign up for that platform.

This, of course, would require some big boy and girl across the aisle non-partisan working together. This is not easy, not encouraged, and rarely rewarded by us, the voter.

speciallist's picture

"40 million American households that read TMR are generally happier
than those people in households that don't read TMR."