The end of Man Made Global Warming ???

Tagged:
Lets look at two images.

This is the Graph of Total Solar Irradiance from 1600 on

irradiance

This is the Temperature from 1600 to the present

temp 1600 on

Its taken from this graph and scaled so it is the same size as the solar irradiance graph.

2000-years-of-global-temperatures

What do you see here ? The temperature has risen and fallen with the solar output, practically ignoring everything else. The sun is the controlling factor in the climate easily overriding the other factors.

We have heard an endless litany of how human activities have been destroying the planet and would make it uninhabitable for ourselves and our descendants. It turns out that while we may have had no effect on the climate our activities have had a very beneficial effect on the biosphere. We have been promoting the advance and cause of life on earth. Yes people acting in their own interests individually have made a better world.

So not only have the greens been wrong repeatedly and endlessly about the causes of climate change, the effects of CO2 on the environment, the effects of mankind on the environment, ALL THEIR PROPOSED SOLUTIONS WOULD HAVE THE OPPOSITE EFFECTS THAN THE STATED DESIRED EFFECTS.

Lets take a look. 1. Greens shot down nuclear power. 2. Greens wanted CO2 and industrialization banned to protect plant and animal life 3. Greens wanted CO2 banned to protect our current perfect climate. 4. Greens wanted Biofuels to achieve carbon neutrality (Instead they have increased carbon output, but wrecked ecosystems and created food shortages)

Just when will the disasters they have been creating drive them from the public sphere ?

Crossposted at Redstate

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
David Hinz's picture

This is the perfect companion piece to Carbon Credits -- Cap and Trade -- A Little History Lesson

You demonstrate that it is a hoax, I demonstrate the reason why.

DocJ's picture

Just when will the disasters (The Greens - those do-gooder, anti-capitalist, green-on-the-outside-commie-pink-on-the-inside, worshipers of Malthus) have been creating drive them from the public sphere ?

When, indeed.

---------
Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock.

but as the daughter of a nuclear physicist I have always been amazed at the firm opinions on scientific issues of those who have no scientific background in the subject they loudly pontificate on. I am indicting the AGW crowd directly. It's purely political and purely anti-American and the data seems to support that. Congressional meddling in science is particularly offensive; most of those people are incompetent - like the MSM. Both pander constantly to the ignorant and the uneducated. (McCain's statements on AGW really make me question his IQ.)

Rush said Seattle is about to ban bonfires on beaches. Could our politicians as a class be any stupider? I 'm serious.

Joliphant, excellent charts! Too bad so many let opinion blind them to facts.

You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you.