John McCain Warned Of Mortgage Collapse In 2005

Tagged:

Barack Obama has been playing off the fears that are running rampant in the market because of the collapse of several of Wall Streets major investment companies like Lehman Brothers. Attacking John McCain and trying to create the idea that McCain does not know what he is talking about and that he is ignorant when it comes to the economy.

For Mr. Obama's information John McCain saw this collapse coming as far back as 2005 and not only warned of the coming collapse but co-sponsored legislation to try and prevent it and go after the corruption that was causing much of the problem. Following is McCain's speech on the Senate floor during debate of Federal Housing Regulatory Act Of 2005 urging the Senate to pass the Act which fell to defeat after being blocked by Senate Democrats.

Mr. President, (referring to the Presiding Officer of the Senate) this week Fannie Mae’s regulator reported that the company’s quarterly reports of profit growth over the past few years were “illusions deliberately and systematically created” by the company’s senior management, which resulted in a $10.6 billion accounting scandal.

The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight’s report goes on to say that Fannie Mae employees deliberately and intentionally manipulated financial reports to hit earnings targets in order to trigger bonuses for senior executives. In the case of Franklin Raines, Fannie Mae’s former chief executive officer, OFHEO’s report shows that over half of Mr. Raines’ compensation for the 6 years through 2003 was directly tied to meeting earnings targets.

The report of financial misconduct at Fannie Mae echoes the deeply troubling $5 billion profit restatement at Freddie Mac. The OFHEO report also states that Fannie Mae used its political power to lobby Congress in an effort to interfere with the regulator’s examination of the company’s accounting problems. This report comes some weeks after Freddie Mac paid a record $3.8 million fine in a settlement with the Federal Election Commission and restated lobbying disclosure reports from 2004 to 2005.

These are entities that have demonstrated over and over again that they are deeply in need of reform. For years I have been concerned about the regulatory structure that governs Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac—known as Government-sponsored entities or GSEs—and the sheer magnitude of these companies and the role they play in the housing market. OFHEO’s report this week does nothing to ease these concerns.

In fact, the report does quite the contrary. OFHEO’s report solidifies my view that the GSEs need to be reformed without delay. I join as a cosponsor of the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005, S. 190, to underscore my support for quick passage of GSE regulatory reform legislation. If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole.

I urge my colleagues to support swift action on this GSE reform legislation."

Senate Democrats blocked the passage of the Bill and while it passed in the House it failed in the Senate because of the Democrats.

Additionally Obama has been claiming that the fault for this collapse lies in the policies of the Bush Administration and the Republicans using this as a way of finger pointing to John McCain when in fact the entire debacle was started under Bill Clinton. The Clinton administration dictated where mortgage lenders could lend and originally helped create the market for the high-risk sub prime loans now infecting the balance sheets of many of Wall Street's most revered institutions. If these institutions did not comply they were threatened with massive fines and penalties.

Clinton put the Community Redevelopment Act, a Carter era law designed to encourage minority home ownership, on steroids. And in so doing, he helped create the market for the risky sub prime loans that he and Democrats now decry as not only greedy but "predatory."

Two of Barack Obama's top staffers, James Johnson who headed the VP selection Committee and Penny Pritzer, Obama's campaign Finance Chair were both not only involved in this debacle but are attributed in creating the situations that began the sub prime lending schemes that caused the mortgage collapse.

Pritzer along with Earnst and Young working through Merrill Lynch created the sub prime financial engineering that created this meltdown. While Johnson was CEO at Fannie Mae when the Clinton Administration ordered the beginnings of the high risk market through the Community Redevelopment Act.

The very reform act that could have stemmed this collapse in 2005 co-sponsored by John McCain was voted against by Barack Obama who also was the third highest recipient of campaign donations from the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac PACS behind only Christopher Dodd and John Kerry.

The hypocrisy of Obama in claiming that the GOP , President Bush and by inference John McCain caused this problem and did nothing to prevent it when in fact just the opposite is true as it began under the Clinton Administration with its birth created by Democrats who are now involved with the Obama campaign, shows that it is Obama who is ignorant about the economy while McCain knows what he is talking about.

McCain's statement that the fundamentals of the economy are still strong has been backed up by the 3.3 % growth in the economy last quarter as well as all other key economic indicators still holding strong. Democrat claims that we are in a recession heading to a depression are scare tactics as even the definition of a recession is two consecutive quarters of negative growth. This economy has not even experience on quarter of negative growth. The mortgage debacle was caused by greed and sub prime loans that created a bubble that was bound to burst. A bubble that was begun by Democrats and their supporters.

A problem that McCain foresaw and tried to stem and Obama voted with Democrats to keep going. Then Obama hired the major instigators of the schemes that created the sub prime lending chaos as top staffers of his Presidential campaign. So who is actually in touch about the economy ? Well it certainly is NOT Barack Obama. Rather the proven foresight of John McCain as well as his understanding of how an economy actually works instead of trying to scare voters as Obama does proves that McCain is the candidate who will stem the tied of greed and bring necessary reforms while allowing the market based economy to continue to grow.

Ken Taylor http://theliberalslies.blogspot.com

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
DocJ's picture

This is absolutely front-page worthy - do you have a link to McCain's Senate floor statement and/or the bill he sponsored?

Also a link to the roll-call where St. Barack voted no would be, well, icing.

I'd do the research myself but I have this darn day-job, you see...

Thanks!

---------
Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock.

David Hinz's picture

thanks for that link

David Hinz's picture

And it needs to be shouted from the roof tops that the Obamessiah voted AGAINST that bill.

streetwise's picture

Raines, a well-connected Democrat, headed Fannie Mae during its go-go years, earning megabucks from its frenzied growth. The Dems constantly resisted efforts to reign him in.

Classic quote:

On Sept. 22, 2004, OFHEO released results of its continuing investigation. The "Special Examination of Fannie Mae" was a dense 211 pages packed with technical accounting details. But the message was clear: OFHEO accused Fannie Mae of both willfully breaking accounting rules and fostering an environment of "weak or nonexistent" internal controls.

And the Dem leadership responds:

"This hearing is about the political lynching of Franklin Raines," said Congressman William Lacy Clay of Missouri. Massachusetts Congressman Barney Frank said, "I see nothing in here that suggests that safety and soundness are an issue." Other Democrats complained that the mere fact of releasing the report could increase the cost of home-ownership.

See full story on Fannie Mae done by Fortune back in 2005. (!)

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2005/01/24/8234040/index.htm

Just because McCain is now a presidential candidate, we should not forget the problems about his obscure relationships with lobbyists and his high-profile statements about reducing the power of lobbyists. In the past, both liberals and conservatives have viewed him with some scepticism, as a maker of histrionic gestures rather than a real reformer. Are we to forget that now?

McCain signed on in May 2006 as co-sponsor of Chuck Hagel's Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005. That was when he gave the stirring Senate speech that is being widely quoted now.

The legislation had died in committee ten months before McCain signed on.

From the time he was McCain's campaign manager in 2000 until 2005, Rick Davis was paid about $2 million to run an advocacy group called the Homeownership Alliance, on behalf of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In August 2000, just as the problems in the subprime explosion were becoming visible, the Wall Street Journal reported that the group aimed at "exposing and defeating trends that would harm consumer access to the lowest-cost mortgage option." The group viewed as threats those who are "seeking to spread unfounded fears about risks to the housing system."

>>>>>>>“Making a real difference is going to take a cooperative effort,” said Homeownership Alliance President Rick Davis. “We hope this report will spark a much-needed dialogue on affordable housing programs......The more Americans we have owning homes, the stronger our economy and the greater the benefit.”

http://www.freddiemac.com/news/features/stories/20051114_homeownership.html
http://www.icba.org/news/newsreleasedetail.cfm?ItemNumber=15451&sn.ItemNumber=1733

Until 2005, Davis was also paid some $400,000 for five hours per week heading McCain's Reform Institute, the stated aim of which was to reduce the power of lobbyists. Like the other lobbyists and fundraisers who were paid lavishly by the Reform Institute, Davis raised large donations from his clients, for all of whom he was lobbying McCain, as Chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee. He earned

Shortly before Davis took leave from Davis Manafort, to head McCain's current campaign, the Homeownership Alliance dissappeared. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac then paid $15,000 per month to the firm, for no obvious activity.

Are we to suppose that Rick Davis, the man who successfully lobbied McCain on behalf of Russian oligarchs, Balkan governments and telecom corporations well into 2006, had nothing to do with McCain supporting and lavishly praising a legislative corpse? McCain knew nothing about OFHEO, and he hasn't mentioned it since his 2006 speech.

McCain is no more trustworthy now than he was when conservatives didn't trust him.

Steve Foley's picture

Barack Obama is a disaster on this issue and takes his advice from some of those responsable for the mess we're in....

Bringing up Rick Davis is completely ridiculous -- he was working as a lawyer when he earned that 2million Barack's financial adviser Franklin Raines made 90+ million

I notice you didn't mention that McCain in 2005 warned us about Fannie and Freddie and supported reforming both!

So again, what's your point?

Knight_of_the_Mind's picture
McCain is no more trustworthy now than he was when conservatives didn't trust him.

We thank you for your overheated bloviation today. That should make up for the sub-par solar winds lately. Obama's Economic Consuting Firm - Fannie Mae Enron!

...that not everyone is sold on this bullsh-t.

McCain voted with his party to deregulate the financial industry. Now that it is falling down on all our heads, John McCain is having a sudden come-to-jesus moment. He is now basically saying, "Well gee, back in 2006 when we controlled both houses and rammed through tax cuts for the rich and several other things the Democrats hated, I kind of suggested that we might consider doing something about this old bill that Chuck Hagel had dropped 10 months ago. I never brought it to the floor for a vote, and it was filled with language about priviatizing and other bone-headed ideas, but hey! I was a Maverick! Vote for me!"

http://4thoffense.com/mc.html

The truth is out there. By "out there" I mean outside your backside. We can't take 4 more years of John Loose Cannon McCain and Sarah Sixpack.

Steve Foley's picture

Your interpretation of what happened with this bill is only that, your interpretation! Which means absolutely nothing and is not indeed fact. Btw - where was your savior Obama on this issue???

........... (((crickets))) Oh yeah... getting bribe money campaign contributions from his current economic advisers Johnson and Raines who both directly responsible for running Fannie into the ground.

Like I said: "given those facts… I’ll stick with McCain even if this is true and he came late to the party the Bush Administration had been promoting this since 2004 and earlier!"

You can keep running with this silly narrative and myopic talking point but you do so at your own beclowning!

That makes 3 times I've countered your sorry excuse for an argument move on to another topic or go away!

Thanks,
Management

[bye bye spammer - simpson]

This seems to be a right leaning blog, but I figured I would go ahead and take the time to correct this misconception. Will this matter to anyone? Perhaps not but I have to try... here goes.

John McCain Is NOT An Economic Reformer!

Three and a half years ago, John McCain belatedly cosponsored an apparently "dead" bill on mortgage regulation. He then did nothing else to revive it or bring it back up for consideration.

http://4thoffense.com/mc.html

S.190 - A bill to address the regulation of secondary mortgage market enterprises, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Hagel, Chuck [NE] (introduced 1/26/2005)
Latest Major Action: 7/28/2005 Senate committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COSPONSORS(3)
Sen Dole, Elizabeth [NC] - 1/26/2005
Sen Sununu, John E. [NH] - 1/26/2005
...time passes...
7/28/2005 (the date of this bill's LAST activity)
Sen McCain, John [AZ] - 5/25/2006

10 MONTHS after anyone had looked at this bill, McCain blew the dust off it and cosponsored it. He didn't do anything to push it forward, and the bill never saw any more activity in the Senate.

That seems to demonstrate a serious lack of leadership. It also continues the pattern of McCain stretching the truth, distorting the facts and outright lying to get elected. "Journalists" need to do their jobs here. Explode this MYTH. McCain has stood for deregulation. His has not been a reformer on the economy. His tax cut for the rich is more of the same.

http://4thoffense.com/mc.html

Steve Foley's picture

the fact is… it was the Democrats direct negligence and wrong headed policies or the fact that Democrats blocked R’s and Bush from implementing oversight on Freddie and Fannie that got us here.

Democrats are to blame here and you don’t like it! Social engineering under the Clinton Administration was the beginning of the mess we’re in now! Socialism is a failed philosophy and Social engineering never works either — those that subscribed to it, like the people in the video below, are to blame…period! Try as you might the facts are the facts and they aren’t on your side!!!

Democrats have been bought and paid for by Fannie and Freddie including “The One” who I assume is your hero

After having served less than 4 years in the US Senate and spending most of that time campaigning, Barack Obama was still able to collect $105,849 from mortgage giants Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. No wonder he took such a liking to Jim Johnson and Frankin Raines.

and there’s this:

So given those facts… I’ll stick with McCain even if this is true and he came late to the party the Bush Administration had been promoting this since 2004 and earlier!

So thanks for stopping by

Regulating Fannie Mae was a petty jesture by McCain. The predatory lenders were the real cause of this trillion dollar financial meltdown, not Fannie Mae.

The Bush Administration's Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the "OCC") prohibited the attorney generals of all 50 states from enforcing state laws against federal banks and their subsidiaries. This allowed local mortgage companies to deceive borrowers into unaffordable loan packages without fear of government supervision. Then the unregulated Wall Street firms lost $700 billion dollars investing in these toxic loans. McCain has been a long-time proponent of deregulating the financial markets.

Fannie Mae only purchased the mortgages after the fraudulent transactions were completed. They should have been much more diligent in reviewing the loans they purchased, however, Fannie does not expose taxpayers to as much liability as Wall Street does.

Brian Simpson's picture

Try buying a clue. I’ll leave you on for now. Test my patience further and you will be disabled.


I think I can say, and say with pride, that we have legislatures that bring higher prices than any in the world. ~ Mark Twain

David Hinz's picture

The evidence is irrefutable that the subprime meltdown was a Democrat policy caused crisis -- and yet you still want to tar the Bush Administration with it. And you pulled that $700 billion figure out of the same little round puckered orifice that Paulson did. Nobody, including Wall Street understands the losses yet.

I do NOT have the same patience level as Brian!

Educate yourself!

Over and over your ilk ignores the 25 times that the Bush Administration begged congress to look into and Fannie and Feddie because they posed a risk to the economy.

GOGGLE search: The community Reinvestment Act of 1999 and read what the New York Times said about it then. You can find more than a dozen articles right here on this site that demonstrate Democratic fingerprints all over the subprime meltdown, and their efforts to prevent any regulation of those two entities.

If you do not believe TMR then find other sources (credible sources --hint: dKos is not credible) to educate yourself on this issue. Tell ya what, I'll throw in the first one for free.

When you have become sufficiently educated to return to society -- use the contact form.

David Hinz's picture

(and it is fitting that you would select a cartoon as a screen name) You do understand how the Senate works, right? Unless you have 60 votes (something the Republican-led Congress was never able to achieve) a minority of 41 Democrats can block ANY and ALL legislation from ever being voted upon.

Due to the intrepid leadership of such stalwart Libertarians like Chris Dodd, Barack H Obama, John "Genghis Khan" Kerry, and "Say it isn't so" Joe Biden, any and all attempts to reform the atrocious aspects of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1999 that prevented ANY regulation of Fannie and Freddie and demanded banks hand out free money to persons unable to repay, were stopped before they could even begin.

Repeated attempts to revive "dead" legislation were thwarted by those who had received hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribe money campaign contributions. Sen John McCain tried! Any evidence out there that Sen Barack H Obama or Sen Joe Biden made any attempts to save the country from imminent collapse at the hands of this fiscal mismanagement?

Words, just words....just speeches...

Yeah, calling someone names based on their login has totally convinced me that y'all have the story straight on this one.

I am just pointing out that when in 2005, Hagel put this bill forth, McCain was not supporting it. He did belatedly do a little dance, but he didn't try to actually put it up for a vote. The Republicans controled the House AND the Senate. Yeah I know those Democrats could have filibustered it, IF it had gotten to the floor. But it never got to the floor.

Furthermore, the bill called for privatizing parts of Fannie and Freddie, so that wasn't what the reality based community woudl call "regulation".

Come on, boys and girls. Your candidate is lying about this and I just called you on it. So you resort to lame excuses such as "well the Dems mighta filibustered!" or "well your login name is UNDERDOG har har"...

Steve Foley's picture

Funny you didn't address the schooling I gave you. I guess the truth hurts!

Your interpretation of what happened with this bill is only that, your interpretation! Which means absolutely nothing and is not indeed fact. Btw - where was your savior Obama on this issue???

........... (((crickets))) Oh yeah... getting bribe money campaign contributions from his current economic advisers Johnson and Raines who both directly responsible for running Fannie into the ground.

Like I said: "given those facts… I’ll stick with McCain even if this is true and he came late to the party the Bush Administration had been promoting this since 2004 and earlier!"

you can keep running with this silly narrative and myopic talking point but you do so at your own beclowning

Oh btw - More on Bush's warnings on Fannie Mae from snopes!

What schooling was that? If you mean your lame attempt to say that majority Republicans were actually afraid of bringing this legislation to the Senate floor and that they were cowed by an unspoken threat of a filibuster, be sure next time to include actual evidence, not conjecture.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/19/AR2008091903604.html?nav=hcmodule

The simple fact is that after some scandals in Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, the Republicans needed political cover. They crafted legislation and then let it die. Why not bring it to the floor for a vote? Show the public that Democrats are against goverment regulation of the financial industry and Republicans favor it? WHY NOT?

Does anyone (even the wingers here) believe that is the real past? Republicans LIKED regulation? Democrats HATED it? Really?

Oh and that snopes article did not vindicate Bush. Read it again. This NYT article (from the Snopes article you misquoted) says:

nytimes wrote:
"After the hearing, Representative Michael G. Oxley, chairman of the Financial Services Committee, and Senator Richard Shelby, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, announced their intention to draft legislation based on the administration's proposal. Industry executives said Congress could complete action on legislation before leaving for recess in the fall."

Oxley and Shelby promised legislation "before recess in the fall". They then dropped it in the back of a filing cabnet. The legislation never materialized. You all were fooled again into believing that these fat cats actually cared about regular people. It happens all the time and you keep coming back for more. You provided no facts that McCain is a reformer, just a lot of hot air.

There is zero chance you'll take these words seriously, I got that. I only wish your crowd will give the Obama/Biden administration a fair chance to rule when elected. I wish you would consider patriotism over party. Somehow I doubt this will happen. You are so afraid of terms like "socialism" (social security, highways, medicare, libraries, etc) to think clearly. In fear of that false boogeyman, you run into the jaws of unregulated capitalism and we end up with meltdowns like this one. But you still don't get it.

Here is some more truth: 19 months ago we got a 48-48-2 Senate and a thin majority in the House. Since then Bush has started vetoing bills and Republicans have started stonewalling.. Republicans controlled all three branches of government for many years, gave tax cuts to the rich and championed deregulation. Republicans continue to crow about "getting Govmint offa the backs of bizness" (that means deregulation) and now simultaneously want to have it believed they also favor regulation. Listen to Palin say precisely that in the debate last night.

Hopefully the sleeping majority will finally wake up to this contradiction and set things right in November.

This is an obvious waste of time. I will leave you the fact-free hate-that-obamamama-hussein-terrorist-lover parting shots. I have done what I could to present what I see as fact. John McCain is LYING about his support of regulating the mortgage industry.

http://4thoffense.com/mc.html

Steve Foley's picture

…with your knownfacts™ and overinflated self absorbed elitism! No, really, thank God you swooped in with your scary intellect to bring truth to us rubes on the right! It’s unfortunate that when given the facts on the broader more topical issue you still continue with your irrelevant myopic TalkingPoint™ but that’s par for the course for moonbats so it’s no surprise.

Beside being completely wrong on all accounts you’re simply not entertaining enough to keep my attention any further! I pity you, really I do… so know you can run back to DKos or MyDD or whatever bastion of liberal hate site you call home and write your obligatory “I brought truth to the unclean center right rubes at TMR screed”

Be well