The Final Put Option

Tagged:
Those of us who have read Ayn Rand can sometimes get too caught up in applying fiction to current reality. Yes, the state is overburdening, yes it will get larger and more obnoxious in the decade from 2010 to 2020. Finally, the man who would lead said state into a new era of statist dictates, doesn’t exactly surround himself with people who view America through a positive frame of reference.

All of that stipulated up front, its enough to make paranoid people, well, more paranoid and more and more ready to Chuck the whole thing and light out for The Territories. As Dr. Helen asked in a recent post on Pajamas Media, “Is it Time to ‘Go John Galt?’”

My answer would be not just yet and probably not ever, if it is at all morally justifiable to do so in the first palce. Just who is this John Galt character anyway?

Quite simply put, he’s the man who exercised the final put option. He was a man who believed so totally in himself that he felt his absence from America diminished America’s prospects more than his own. It wouldn’t be completely harsh or unfair to consider John Galt a legend in his own mind.

One man’s egoism is another fellow’s arrogance. Ayn Rand, as described by Alan Greenspan in his autobiography Age of Turbulence, must not have always been the most welcomed guest at a cocktail party. Nonetheless, that desire to light out for Galt’s Gulch sometimes besets even me after a frustrating day of headlines on Drudge or RCP.

Dr. Helen tees up what many of the most frustrated in America feel about the current run of political fortune. She frames the criterion or, if you will, the Strike Price, at which the put option becomes the least rancid entrée on life’s unpleasant buffet table.

Perhaps the partisan politics we are dealing with now is really just a struggle between those of us who believe in productivity, personal responsibility, and keeping government interference to a minimum, and those who believe in the socialistic policies of taking from others, using the government as a watchdog, and rewarding those who overspend, underwork, or are just plain unproductive.

Obama talks about taking from those who are productive and redistributing to those who are not — or who are not as successful. If success and productivity is to be punished, why bother? Perhaps it is time for those of us who make the money and pay the taxes to take it easy, live on less, and let the looters of the world find their own way.

So when Huey “The Kingfish” Biden tells us that a patriot wants to pay more taxes to help pump up “the little guy” it seems that confiscatory socialism looms. When Barack Obama actually uses Senator Long’s old bromide that America should “Share the Wealth”, perhaps success does become a misdemeanor punishable by confiscatory fines known as “progressive taxation.”

It may be enough to make more and more people agree with the old Socio-fascist firebrand-Senator from Louisiana and decide that “Hard work is damn near as overrated as monogamy.” Should a critical mass of the working population ever decide that way, a Chernobyl-like series of reactions ensues. At the end of this meltdown, everyone expects their portion of the wealth spread, but only a truly ingenuous sucker would be stupid enough to produce more than what biological subsistence required.

Before that sad day could occur in the Home of The Free and The Land of The Brave, a lot; a major, humongous lot, would have to go wrong with the fundamental basis of US society. I feel we have a long way to go before hard work stops being rewarded. Even in a economic policy throwback to The Carter Administration. If nothing else, breaking rocks in the hot sun does wonders for both your gluets and your pects.

Fundamentally, the wealth we earn from our work and our investments is property. Property rights are sacrosanct in America, or as close as anything secular can get to so being. It may not just be guns that a redistributionist Congressional majority would have to pry from our cold, dead fingers. Even those of us who don’t have much, do derive a lot of our patriotic sentiment and our peace of mind from the fact that what is ours, is quite simply, ours, damnit!

Cynics will laugh at this sentiment as naïve wishful thinking. They will recommend that I pay a visit to Mrs. Kelo’s abode in New London, Ct. Oh, that’s right. I can’t visit The Kelos' house in New London.

The town council confiscated it because their per capita strip mall density just wasn’t high enough to raise adequate municipal revenue off of. Furthermore, small business owners in Oakland have had similar range wars with Dominus et Maiorus, Jerry Brown. The implication of this dialogue would be, the extent to which your overlords let you believe you really own anything depends upon which lever you pull this November.

Another bulwark against rancid, creeping statists is the Australian Secret Ballot. The elite may not like the average American very much, however, they do have to respect the iron will of the ballot box. Assuming things go the way everyone in the polling business currently portends, the Democrats have an open field to run through for two years. Then, they had better have results in line with the expectations of the great American Heartland. Lest they be voted back to their think tanks and personal injury law firms.

Again, the cynics demur and laugh up their sleeves at my ignorant cheerfulness. 105% of Indianapolis, Indiana didn’t register out of civic duty. They tell me I must believe that Mickey Mouse is a calculating swing voter or something. So maybe the whole system has been gamed, measured and rigged to propel America on a dubious road to tyranny and social equalitarianism.

So assuming the game is rigged and that we only own what our liege lords don’t confiscate from us and haul back to Castle Inverness to reward their flunkies with, what does “Going John Galt” actually entail? It wouldn’t be easy, it wouldn’t be pleasant. One of Dr. Helen’s commentators gives us a taste of the process. See if you enjoy the flavor?

Pete says,

I sold my business.

I sold several properties, two of them to my children at a significant “loss.” (Ka-Ching!)

I’m raising a great deal of my own food and have taken to raising sheep and poultry. All for personal consumption, not sale.

I live in a rural area, so while Andy and Bob and Charlie might buy some sheep to be raised by me, Andy is buying swine, Bob is buying beef, etc.

Canning. Freezing.

Buying bulk.

For the nonce, I don’t believe I’ll be joining Calamity Pete atop Ruby Ridge. Things are bad in America, for the next six to ten years, they will get progressively worse. Yet, despite my own pessimistic belief that the glass is half-full – of pure, unadulterated horse-urine, we are way better off than the vast majority of the world.

We simply don’t live the same history that prior generations of Americans had to suffer through. We can still change this country for the better. The road back from serfdom will require a steady driver. We, those of us who still believe what Conservatives believe, need to be ready to fire up that bandwagon.

We can’t make America better off by abandoning it for Galt’s Gulch. We should stand where we live, fight for what we believe in, and not activate our final put option out a frustrated fit of pique. Our great nation deserves far better than any of that.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Jack Serious's picture

The idea of 'shrugging' would only give more power and influence to the ne'er-do-wells. One thing we should know from the last 232 years in America is that "the good fight" never ends.

My fav line from Atlas Shrugged (I believe it hung over the door of Francisco d'Anconia's cottage in Gult's Gulch): "I swear by my life and my love of it that I will not live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for the sake of mine."

I've often thought that where both extreme ends of the political spectrum get into trouble is when they forget one of those two clauses and only remember the other.

_________________________________
Media Bias Destroys Informed Electorates & Healthy Democracies

Knight_of_the_Mind's picture
We can't just hand it over on a silver platter.

How about them COWBOYS!!!

Wierd. I’m a teacher at a local high school, and we have a part of the day where all students and teachers read. I’ve been re-reading “Atlas Shrugged.”

I’ve posted several times already on the FreeRepublic.com website that I am already planning a kind of Galt-like tax revolt should the Obamapocolypse arrive in America. No, I’m not going to hide in the mountains somewhere, but I will do something that honors the theme of the book - I’ll refuse to give my productive effort to the “looters.”

I’ll work just enough to support myself and my family. I’ll do the minimum at work. No extra effort. Maybe, with enough sloth, I can reduce my income to the point where I can join the large group of Americans who pay no income tax at all. The state can certainly jail me for not paying taxes, and if I openly organize a tax revolt, there are laws out there, like the RICO statutes, which could easily be used to quash dissent. The state, however, will be hard pressed to find a way to make me more productive without my consent.

Imagine if many of joined in this kind of tax revolt. Small businesses could sell just enough to get by. Workers could refuse raises. The very wealthy could sell off capital and wealth, or just abandon it at a loss.

John Galt’s attempt to “’stop the motor of the world” would be replaced by “starving the government behemoth.” Sure, I’ll pay my taxes. Based on the amount I earn. Which will be as little as I can make and still get by.

Think of it as a Cloward-Piven strategy in reverse.

It’s hard to confiscate wealth if the producers of the wealth simply stop creating it.

Strange that this idea is circulating out there kin so many places. Now I see it in this article, too. Ayn Rand would be proud.

Steve Foley's picture

There's nothing I disagree with here.....

Btw welcome to TMR I hope you chose to stay :0)

Jack Serious's picture

Nice turn on the update.

"starving the government behemoth!"

I agree, great comment. It could go right into Galt's radio address to America--asking everyone to join them in the mtns. so to speak.


_________________________________
Media Bias Destroys Informed Electorates & Healthy Democracies

speciallist's picture

I am two steps ahead in California...except for Property taxes.....

I keep my Taxable income at ZERO........you heard me............

"40 million American households that read TMR are generally happier
than those people in households that don't read TMR."

speciallist's picture

"40 million American households that read TMR are generally happier
than those people in households that don't read TMR."

David Hinz's picture

is the inevitable outcome of every Socialist society. That is the reason for the collapse of the Soviet Union and for the near starvation of the original Plymouth Colony.

Take away the incentive to work -- take away the profit motive -- and everyone does just enough to get by.

Knight_of_the_Mind's picture
It depends upon what Obama actually does when he gets into office. If really means it when he says he intends to prevent Joe The Plumber from ever moving up into the executive office, than I find myself agreeing with your take a lot more. As I said in my post, I'm not ready to go Galt yet for 3 reasons. 1) Government has not amassed enough power yet to be worth the loss we'd all take to "go full-on John Galt." If they can stop me from ever getting to the top, for example, I want to own my own house one day, but have been holding off because of the home prices. If they completely wreck home ownership, I may not have enough of a potential future gain to not go Galt. So just on a personal level, I'm not ready to hide in the woods just yet.

2) I am my brother's keeper, not his baby-sitter. I will accept a certain responsibility to remain part of the current civic culture, pay taxes, obey laws and genuinely make the effort to do what admittedly limited things I can to make America greater. That is regardless of which political team sticks the ball into the end zone. I may be the slow, white kid in many respects, but I'm never going to run at half speed purely because of political resentments.

Ultimately, if the actual policies enacted by a future administration are designed to punish my efforts and confiscate the fruits of my labor. That is, if Barack Obama is really stupid enough to believe his campaign rhetoric to the hilt, I may have to reconsider. I'll help my neighbor, but I expect to him to be a neighbor, not a mooch. So, there is a point where I would quit too, but....(segue to point 3)

3) If BHO really does what he promises, there will be a train-wreck. It won't be a full-on train-wreck because Congress will pull the plug on Hope and Change somewhere before Cuffy Meigs (or perhaps James Carville) gets his grubby, malficious hands on Project X.

Once that plug gets pulled, it becomes Newt Gingrich time again. However, the person who offers that new Contract With America has to have lost some skin in the game. They have to be invested.

I say that because of the Palin Effect. People who get Sarah Palin get her because she knows or at least has some good, common-sense insights, on what its like to be an Average Joe. She's tried selling snow machines, and can hence, understand what a tough and challenging experience Joe The Plummer has had.

She gets the frustration he feels. The person in charge of the post-Obama detoxification will ahve to relate in order to rule.

How about them COWBOYS!!!