How Obama might avoid landslide defeat

Tagged:

[This is my reply to a former newspaper editor of mine from my years in Atlanta 2001-2006, who asked if I still thought the republican would win in a landslide.]

Dear Madam Editor

Hey gal! Good to hear from you.

Well, a landslide, whether electoral or popular, by either of our definitions, looks unlikely (by either) given that the GOP didn’t pick an unapologetic, unabashed conservative, but I still expect history to repeat itself until it doesn’t, and that would mean that a USA that has never elected a far left liberal, would continue not to do so.

Having been intimately involved in every presidential campaign since 1980 either as a democrat campaign activist; campaign manager; county chair; or repub campaign worker (incl this year for a black repub conservative candidate in NC), I have lived thru many October 15ths, most all of which had the GOP candidate behind a liberal that the GOP went on to beat. Carter and Clinton avoided the fate by not running to the left and/or thanks to Perot. I would concede that there are negatives this time ‘round that were not present in past GOP victory years, esp the fact of the history of winning a third term coupled with bad econ times. Rather a potent obstacle especially when the GOP picked a maverick moderate.

The GOP wins when it runs to the right as unabashed, unapologetic conservatives and picks off conservative dems, not when it tries to appeal to moderate dems and indies. (See losses by Ford, Carter II, Bush II and Dole but also see Bush 41’s victory in 88).

Add to this, the near anemic campaign of McCain, which is part and parcel of being a moderate. God spews out the lukewarm, and so does the GOP and America. (But they spew out leftists quicker. See BHO)

Palin was the best move because she gave voice to the Reaganites that are still the majority. Gallup show that most Americans are very or somewhat conservative (62%). Add to this, the specter of ACORN and other vote fraud via Motor-Voter (see 200,000 in Ohio alone) and I have exhausted my reasons that my 2006 prediction that a generic repub would win in a landslide in 2008 against a Dem Party that had thrown off Bill Clinton DLCism esp with a Hillary that would energize the base of the GOP to register every Baptist Bubba moving! I still think that Obama is unelectable and that the combination of a base energized positively by Palin and negatively by the spectre of socialist government writ large by Obama will prove fatal to the Democrats.

Obama is farther to the left than Hillary, especially the Hillary that “grew” in the campaign. I think Rev Wright and the din of the 20-year pew-parked in a Hate Whitey America Church butt did permanent damage and set a ceiling on his vote percentage. Add to that his statement that Pennsylvania voters were for Hillary because they were bitter clingers to “antipathy to people not like them” (see also the less relevant God and Guns). Hint: The GOP is the Stupid Party. They liked the sound of the God and Guns alliteration, largely ignoring the more explosive charge that Obama had just called most whites bigots, which would dovetail nicely with his grandmother’s typical white person-ness and quotes from his books. (Love his books btw.) Great for a guy that has accomplished nothing as a lawyer or community organizer (unless ACORN delivers a victory, but then his accomplishment would be vile)

But, I have been spending lots of time trying to stop the gloom and doom GOP bloggers and others from despairing and giving up, due to poll obsessions that are unjustified by history and misplaced allegiance to the MSM’s “Debate moment theory of Presidential history.”

People are not so fickle. Reagan won by ten points and I knew he would win before either of his 80 or 84 debate moments. And, as I alluded to before, there is a rich history of polls being against the GOP until 72 hours or less before the vote, so that pollsters can salvage their credibility.

I don’t obsess over polls, etc. I work for victory until Election Day, and I don’t mind eating crow once every 45 years! I have never been wrong on a presidential election. I may be wrong this year, but if I turn out to be, I will focus on it for one day, not weeks leading up to the one day we vote (I know we have early voting, but you know what I mean), and thanks to you, I have now written Pre-Mortem, the post-mortem that would be expected of me!

Obama should have had his hide peeled long before now (Which may actually be peeled and/or in the process of same as we speak) given that his character witnesses have to hide in basements praying for him; hide behind attempted restraining orders denying access to Annenberg papers; or the Fifth Amendment. His congregation gives standing ovations to vile racist and anti-American slander, BUT he is COOL.

He has a good temperament while McCain does not. But he also exudes a certain arrogance and sexism (I know, DeVine pot and kettle, but Palin is curing me!) and the PUMA Hillaryites are a big danger to him. His internal pollster was heard saying that Obama thinks he is only tied right now and that they can’t gauge the Palin base.

And, the final point. The fact is that a large majority of whites WANT to vote for a Black man, all things being equal. Many are saddled with the ridiculous “white guilt” that Shelby Steele writes of, but most are not. Most just would like to show bigger evidence of a fact that has been true for 25 years: only a small number of whites are racist and this country is the least racist on the face of the Earth. The problem for Obama is that he sat in that pew for 20 years and was mentored by a racist that honored the number one racist in America: Calypso Louis Farrakhan!

The problem for McCain is that he is too timid of being called racist by the media, when going after Obama on Wright is not racist at all. Its about what Wright says and what Obama abided. So, many democrats may see less difference if McCain doesn’t have the guts to take it on.

This goes to my main theme: Conservative dems vote GOP when they see a spine. Otherwise they revert to what’s natural for them. Its a bad nature in my book. After all, I converted way too late in my opinion. But, having said all that, I remain optimistic.

But it is possible, I guess that this smooth operator can avoid landslide defeat due to the above factors.

Great to hear from you gal!

Very truly yours.

Mike DeVine “One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
speciallist's picture
"40 million American households that read TMR are generally happier than those people in households that don't read TMR."
gamecock's picture

reasons: The assumption behind that phrase is that "the game" is as the MSM says it is, and like they always say every four years and I reject the debate moment (or TV moment) theory of the reason for presidential outcomes.

I think the game is that the public spots the liberal over time and decides not to elect them. They base their decision on accumulated knowledge.

Plus, as with the term gravitas in 2000, I can't stand lack of creativity in the media and refuse to participate. Everyone uesed the term gravitas re bush cheney when they never used it before 2000 or since, and God knows it needs use re Obama.

And now, after never hearing the term game changer before this year, one can't go 5 minutes on political cable without hearing it.

i hurl

but nice pic!

smile

"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson

speciallist's picture

you know me...I use that phrase precisely because it's so silly!

"40 million American households that read TMR are generally happier
than those people in households that don't read TMR."

66chevelle's picture

As I've mentioned before, I've got some PUMA-in-laws who are supporting McCain, and their morale is taking a hit from the steady drumbeat of Obama inevitability in the MSM. They aren't used to playing the "game" on this side of the field and haven't quite learned to block out the MSM crowd noise. My wife has been magnificent with motivational pep talks to them, and she has commanded them to spread the gospel to other doubters.

If you know someone who is crossing over to vote for McCain this year, make sure they are educated on the tired, old Dem/MSM strategery and do your best to erase their doubts about McCain's chances of winning. The MSM/Dems are counting on their gullibility, because we can't be fooled anymore.

gamecock's picture

http://www.redstate.com/diaries/gamecock/2008/oct/17/debunking-the-debate-tv-moment-theory-of-pres/

also at hinzsight

"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson

speciallist's picture

"40 million American households that read TMR are generally happier
than those people in households that don't read TMR."

streetwise's picture

Although I think the clincher against the Dems in most cases is not ideological conservatism, but "energy in the executive". The voters look for someone who is STRONG on national defense, foreign policy assertiveness and economic growth. Since the Dems tend to be hostile towards all three, the trends turn against them.

gamecock's picture

nicely with my theory that we get conservative dems by being unabased...same thing

great point brother

"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson

Knight_of_the_Mind's picture

How about them COWBOYS!!!

gamecock's picture

"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson

Knight_of_the_Mind's picture
The ones whose recent foray in Senator McCain's home turf reminded me of an old bumpersticker that was popular at Auburn U. "Punt, 'Bama Punt" How about them COWBOYS!!!