NRSC Statement on Gary Peters Entering 2014 Michigan Senate Race #MISen

Washington, D.C. - Statement from the National Republican Senatorial Committee Communications Director Brad Dayspring on reports that Gary Peters will enter the 2014 Michigan Senate race:
“Gary Peters already lost a statewide campaign and that was before supporting a cap and trade energy tax policy that would effectively put Michigan out of business and ObamaCare which will raise health care costs. It takes a special kind of guy like Peters to ask for a promotion from the very same people that his policies would put out of work.
“If Gary Peters is indeed the Democratic candidate in Michigan, Republicans have a great opportunity to pick up this seat and move closer to the taking majority in 2014.”
Letter sent to Obama Tests Positive for Ricin, Portions of Senate Office Buildings Evacuated Due to Suspicious Packages

Letter sent to Obama tests positive for ricin, FBI says
The FBI has confirmed that a letter addressed to President Obama has “preliminarily tested positive” for ricin, a day after lawmakers said another letter sent to the Capitol Hill office of Sen. Roger Wicker tested positive for the same substance.
The warnings come amid a flurry of reports on suspicious packages on Capitol Hill. Fox News has learned of at least three suspicious packages in two separate Capitol Hill office buildings, compounding security concerns in the wake of the letter incidents and the Boston bombing, which the FBI has said do not appear to be related.
Both of the suspicious letters were apparently intercepted on Tuesday. They never reached the Hill or the White House.
Read more…
Portions of Senate office buildings evacuated
(UPDATE 12:24 p.m. ET)
Authorities are investigating a suspicious letter at the office of Sen. Carl Levin in Saginaw, Michigan. “Earlier today, a staffer at my Saginaw regional office received a suspicious-looking letter,” Levin said in a statement. “The letter was not opened, and the staffer followed the proper protocols for the situation, including alerting the authorities, who are now investigating. We do not know yet if the mail presented a threat.”
(UPDATE 12:08 p.m. ET)
The man carrying a bag of letters who is being questioned by Capitol police is not believed to be connected to a letter possibly containing ricin found in a Senate mailroom and an apparently similar letter sent to President Obama, a federal law enforcement official told CNN. The man being questioned is described as emotionally disturbed, the official said.
(UPDATE 12:00 p.m. ET)
Capitol Hill Police are questioning a man with a backpack in the area of the Hart Senate Office Building. He raised suspicions with the contents of his backpack and the way he responded to police questions, two Capitol Hill police officers told CNN. The man’s backpack contained sealed envelopes, one of the officers said. The backpack is being X-rayed, one of the officers said.
(POSTED 11:43 a.m. ET)
U.S. Capitol Police are evacuating the first floor of the Hart Senate Office Building due to a suspicious package. People on other floors of the building are being told to go into their offices. Separately, there is a suspicious envelope at the office of Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama, in the Russell Senate Office Building. Security has cleared the hall but is not officially evacuating.
Big Mo’ – Honeymoon Over?

The following is a message from Brad Dayspring Communications Director for the NRSC:
This might be the week in which the door was slammed on the post election honeymoon and/or doldrums, depending on your political leanings. As President Obama worked to minimize the failed sequester strategy damage has caused, Republicans began to get our mojo back by standing up and fighting. And yesterday, a 2014 map that was already sorta difficult for Senate Democrats became even tougher.
This morning, the Wall Street Journal’s Neil King begins to pull back the curtain on the NRSC’s plans for the new election cycle. ”Republican prospects for taking the Senate in 2014 brightened Thursday with Michigan Democratic Sen. Carl Levin’s announcement that he won’t run for re-election,” King writes. “But the man in charge of the GOP’s Senate campaign arm says the party has work to do to capitalize on this and other opportunities, mainly by identifying and supporting candidates it sees as electable. ”The last election taught us that candidates matter,” said Kansas Sen. Jerry Moran, chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, in outlining his strategy for an election year that aligns well for the GOP effort to take the Senate. ”We can’t simply take a hands-off approach and say it doesn’t matter to us,” he said in an interview.”
Conservatives inherently understand that Washington doesn’t know best, in fact it’s in our DNA. That’s why the NRSC is hard at work building relationships in all 2014 battleground states with local grassroots organizations, elected officials, and potential 2014 candidates and staff. ”Unlike in 2010, when the GOP ran a nationally focused campaign attacking the Obama administration’s stimulus spending and national health-care overhaul, Mr. Moran said the party intends to tailor next year’s campaigns to appeal to local interests and local sensitivities. Each state needs to have a state campaign that is independent of any national campaign,” he said.
Battleground states are different entities, there is no one size fits all solution, and the path to victory is going to look different in each. ”Mr. Moran was diplomatic in saying the campaign committee likely wouldn’t endorse primary candidates outright. But he said the group was already working alongside governors, chambers of commerce and legislators in various states “to find candidates that are electable.” By building trust early, fostering and harnessing momentum, and synergizing our efforts with those on the ground, the goal is simple: to get the Senate functioning so that it works or the people again, instead of just the powerful in Washington.
Seize the day,
Brad Dayspring
2014 BATTLEGROUND SONAR
KENTUCKY: NRSC Announces Email Recruiting Bid for 1st Candidate of 2014 Cycle… ASHLEY JUDD..The email is designed to look like a fundraising pitch for Judd from Democrats.vv“Ashley Judd needs your help. Despite the fact that she lives inTennessee, Judd desperately wants to run for Senate in neighboring Kentucky. I know what you’re thinking: how can a person who has said “Tennessee is home,” that San Francisco is “my American city home” and that she “winters in Scotland” run for Senate in Kentucky?” the email reads. “Well, that’s where you come in.,” it says. Littered with links to “donate” to Judd’s campaign, the email also includes photos of the Versailles, Kentucky castle and urges donors to “donate $10,000, $25,000 or $50,000 we can start to piece together a down payment for a house that provides Judd all the amenities that she has grown accustomed to as she jets between Hollywood, Scotland, San Francisco and Tennessee.”
MICHIGAN: Who Will Fill Levin’s Seat? “Michigan Republicans have a lot of strong potential candidates, and we are more than ready to have a real conversation with Michigan families why Republican leadership is necessary to fix Washington,” Michigan Republican Chairman Bobby Schostak said in a statement Thursday. Republican consultant Stu Sandler described the Levin retirement as “a once-in-a-30-year opportunity.” He noted 2014 will be a non-presidential year and said he expects the GOP will have “a very strong ticket” headed by Gov. Rick Snyder. …”This has just gone from being a sure thing to a competitive race,” said Lansing political consultant Ken Brock. “I would expect large fields on both sides.”
SOUTH DAKOTA/ILLINOIS: Are Durbin and Johnson I next? Other potential Democratic retirements include Sen. Tim Johnson (D-S.D.), who many expect to leave the Senate, and Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), who has yet to make a public decision.
ARKANSAS: Mark Pryor is vulnerable… ”In 2014, Arkansas offers Republicans a chance to replace Democrats in the Governor’s Mansion, where Gov. Mike Beebe is term-limited, and in the Senate, where Sen. Mark Pryor is vulnerable. Democrats, of course, will not simply hand over those seats… …It’s rare for incumbent senators to lose in the general election, but this is the first time Pryor has had a Republican opponent since President Obama was elected, and the state is in the midst of a historic shift. That means the national GOP and its allies will make Pryor’s seat a top priority. The Club for Growth, a powerful group backed by big donors that supports limited government, has already produced an ad tying him to Obama — complete, as is usually the case with both sides, with a faceless narrator, unflattering photos, and sound effects. The Supreme Court has ruled that these groups, unlike the actual campaigns, can raise and spend unlimited money when they don’t donate directly to candidates. So expect to see ads like this every time you tune the TV to a local station in 2014.”
Senator Carl Levin Out for 2014

WASHINGTON – U.S. Sen. Carl Levin, who has been a force for progressivism in the Senate since 1979 and made his mark in recent years as chairman of the powerful Armed Services Committee, will not run for re-election next year, likely setting off a political avalanche of interest in the seat.
Levin, 78, released a statement Thursday afternoon saying he made the decisions believing “I can best serve my state and my nation by concentrating in the next two years on the challenging issues before us … in other words, by doing my job without the distraction of campaigning for re-election.”
Brad Dayspring, Communications Director for the NRSC issued the following Statement from the National Republican Senatorial Committee on today’s announcement by U.S. Senator Carl Levin and the 2014 Michigan Senate race:
“Over the last few months, the 2014 map has gone from sorta difficult to really tough for Senate Democrats. Politically, Senator Levin’s decision knocks a Democratic Senate already on defense far back on their heels and offers us a real pick up opportunity. Republicans can win in Michigan, as the Governor, Lt. Governor, Secretary of State, and Attorney General have proven. That is why we’ve been speaking to local officials and grassroots organizations in preparation for Senator Levin’s potential retirement, and now that groundwork will start to pay off.”
VIDEO: Rosa Parks Stamp Issued on Her 100th Birthday


The U.S. Postal Service has unveiled the Rosa Parks Forever Stamp to honor the civil rights icon on her hundredth birthday for her role in the civil rights struggles of the 1950′s and 60′s.
Heritage: Will the Senate Minority Be Silenced?

Originally posted at The Foundry by Amy Payne
Life is good when you’re in the majority—and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) seems to believe he’ll be there forever.
Reid has already effectively shut down the opportunity for minority Senators to offer amendments to bills. Now he is angling to change the Senate’s rules so that minority members cannot filibuster a bill.
The way the Senate is set up, every Senator has the ability to debate legislation. But as Heritage senior legal fellow Hans von Spakovsky notes, “If members lose these abilities, the majority party will have the unchecked capability to shut off debate and pass legislation without opposition.”
The filibuster—famously depicted in the movie Mr. Smith Goes to Washington—actually doesn’t happen that often. As Senator Jim DeMint wrote for Heritage in November, “The last person to engage in a genuine filibuster was the ultraliberal Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders. In 2010, He spoke on the Senate floor for eight hours straight in an attempt to defeat legislation to extend tax rates.”
In recent years, Republicans have not filibustered legislation, despite Reid’s current crusade. DeMint notes that “filibusters have not prevented the Democrat-led Senate from passing a budget over the past three years, preventing the so-called ‘fiscal cliff,’ or taking steps to reduce our $16 trillion and rising debt. Harry Reid has.”
To shut down debate takes a vote of three-fifths of the Senate. But Reid wants to change longstanding Senate rules so that a simple majority of 51 Senators could end any debate. This has been called the “nuclear option.”
Of course, Reid seems to assume that his party will never lose the majority, and this rule change would work forever in his favor. Both Reid and President Obama have previously argued against changing the rules when it wouldn’t benefit them.
In 2005, then-Senator Barack Obama correctly argued:
what [the American people] don’t expect, is for one party, be it Republican or Democrat, to change the rules in the middle of the game so that they can make all the decisions while the other party is told to sit down and keep quiet…everyone in this chamber knows that if the majority chooses to end the filibuster—if they choose to change the rules and put an end to democratic debate—then the fighting and the bitterness and the gridlock will only get worse.
Reid isn’t the only one looking to change the Senate rules. Senators John McCain (R-AZ) and Carl Levin (D-MI) are now claiming that their plan for a bipartisan “reform” of Senate procedures is a better idea. But von Spakovsky explains that it would “create a new category of super senators who will be empowered to participate in the legislative process to the exclusion of rank-and-file members.” It would concentrate power in the hands of only four Senators, excluding the other 96 from being able to offer amendments to legislation.
“This proposal may be worse than Reid’s because it would empower the leadership of both parties to the detriment of open debate and a free amendment process available to all members,” von Spakovsky writes.
The Senate’s rules were set up for very good reasons. Von Spakovsky reminds us that “George Washington told Jefferson that the Senate was intended to ‘cool’ House legislation in the same way that a saucer was used to cool hot tea.” Unlike the House, in the Senate, every state has equal representation, and every Senator should have a voice. If the rules change every time the majority party changes, the Senate will lose its ability to deliberate in the way it was designed.
Sequestering Layoff Notices
The Obama Administration Is Trying To Hide Jobs Impact Of Defense Cuts
Obama Admin ‘Slapped’ Businesses, Call Layoff Notices ‘Inappropriate’
“The Obama administration slapped at defense contractors on Monday, saying threats to issue layoff notices before the election because of pending Pentagon cuts is ‘inappropriate.’” (“Obama Administration Pushes Back At Defense Layoff Threats,” The Hill, 7/30/12)
· “Behind the potential layoff notices is the 1988 Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification, or WARN, Act. The law requires companies with more than 100 employees to alert workers that they may be laid off if there is a foreseeable event in the next 60 days that is likely to require the dismissals.” (“As ‘Fiscal Cliff’ Looms, Debate Over Pre-Election Day Layoff Notices Heats Up,” Washington Post, 7/31/12)
· OBAMA ADMIN NOTICE: “WARN Act notice to employees of Federal contractors, including in the defense industry, is not required 60 days in advance of January 2, 2013, and would be inappropriate…” (“Obama Administration Pushes Back At Defense Layoff Threats,” The Hill, 7/30/12)
UNIVERSITY STUDY: Over 1 Million Jobs ‘Would Be Lost Due To DOD Budget Cuts’
University Study: ‘[T]otal of 1,090,359 jobs … would be lost due to DOD budget cuts’ “The estimated decrease in federal spending with the implementation of the Budget Control Act of 2011 (spending for FY 2012 and FY 2013) will reduce DOD spending by a total of $56.7 billion… A total of 1,090,359 jobs with a total labor income of $46.5 billion would be lost due to DOD budget cuts in FY 2012-FY 2013.” (“Sequestration Puts 2.14 Million Total Jobs At Risk,” George Mason University, P.1, 7/17/12)
· ‘Lockheed Could Have To Lay Off As Many As 10,000 Workers Next Year,’ will ‘send pink slips to each of its 120,000 employees nationwide in early November.’ “CEO Robert Stevens told the House Armed Services Committee that Lockheed could have to lay off as many as 10,000 workers next year. … Lockheed Martin, the state’s largest federal contractor, has said it would send pink slips to each of its 120,000 employees nationwide in early November to comply with federal and state layoff notification laws.” (“Md. Defense Contractors Press Congress For Details Of Cuts,” The Baltimore Sun, 7/29/12)
· ‘Northrop Grumman … to lay off thousands.’ “Northrop Grumman Corp. says it is already having difficulty attracting bright, tech-savvy workers. The CEO of Lockheed Martin Corp. told Congress this month that his company could have to lay off thousands of employees.” (“Md. Defense Contractors Press Congress For Details Of Cuts,” The Baltimore Sun, 7/29/12)
· “Pentagon officials told Congress this week that between 89,000 and 200,000 civilian employees might have to be cut.” (“Federal Budget Cuts Loom Over Texas, Dallas-Fort Worth Defense Employers,” The Dallas Morning News, 7/28/12)
SEN. LEVIN (D-MI): ‘Severely Damaging If Sequestration Occurs’
“‘I sure as hell hope that sequestration doesn’t happen,’ Panetta told a joint House panel focused on veterans issues. ‘It would be, as I’ve said, time and time again, a disaster in terms of the Defense Department, as far as our budget is concerned and as far as our ability to respond to the threats that are out there.’” (“3 GOP Senators To Tour Presidential Battleground States Warning About Defense Cuts,” The Washington Post, 7/25/12)
· SEC. PANETTA: “I think you all recognize that sequester would be entirely unacceptable, and I really urge both sides to work together to try to find the kind of comprehensive solution that would de-trigger sequester and try to do this way ahead of this potential disaster that we confront.” (U.S. Senate, Appropriations Committee, Hearing, 6/13/12)
SEN. CARL LEVIN (D-MI): ‘[I]t would be severely damaging if sequestration occurs.’ “The specter of sequestration is such that businesses, local governments who have to plan are going to assume that the current law, which requires sequestration, is going to kick in. And unless there’s some clear indicator in time — and that means, to me, in the fall — that there will be some way to avoid sequestration, I think you’re going to see some decisions made in businesses and in local governments which will weaken the economy. … it would be severely damaging if sequestration occurs.” (Sen. Levin, Bloomberg Government Defense Conference, 6/22/12)
VIDEO: Dems’ Gas Price Priorities
Despite The High Cost Of Fuel, Dems Are Insisting On A Plan That Will Have ‘No Impact On Gasoline Prices’
DEMS: ‘It Is Not A Question Of Gas Prices,’ ‘That’s Not The Issue’
VIDEO TRANSCRIPT
CNN: “…what would their plan do to help lower the high gas prices Democrats came here to illustrate? The answer: not much.” SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER (D-NY): “This was never intended to talk about lowering prices.” (CNN’s “The Situation Room,” 5/11/11)
SEN. MAX BAUCUS (D-MT): “You know, this is not going to change the price at the gasoline pump. That’s not the issue. I don’t see that as an issue at all.” (U.S. Senate, Finance Committee, Hearing, 5/12/11)
SEN. HARRY REID (D-NV): “… it is not a question of gas prices.” (Sen. Reid, Floor Remarks, 5/16/11)
SEN. CARL LEVIN (D-MI): “… this proposal will not alter the economic fundamentals that determine gasoline prices.” (Sen. Levin, Floor Remarks, 5/16/11)
SEN. MARK BEGICH (D-AK): “It won’t decrease gas prices at the pump…” (Sen. Begich, Floor Remarks, 5/11/11)
SEN. BEN CARDIN (D-MD): “… No impact on gasoline prices.” (Sen. Cardin, Floor Remarks, 5/16/11)
SEN. MARY LANDRIEU (D-LA): “It will not reduce gasoline prices by one penny.” (Sen. Landrieu, Floor Remarks, 5/11/11)
POLL: 85% Of Americans Want ‘Immediate’ Action On Gas Prices
GALLUP POLL: “A variety of economic-related issues dominate Americans’ top concerns on a list of 15 issues facing the country today. The economy and gas prices lead the list, with 71% and 65% of Americans, respectively, saying they personally worry ‘a great deal’ about each.” (“Economic Issues Still Dominate Americans’ National Worries,” Gallup Poll, 3/28/12)
67% Of Americans Say Gas Prices Have Caused Financial Hardship For Their Household (“Gas Prices,” Gallup Poll, 3/29/12)
65% Of Americans Worry A ‘Great Deal’ About Gas Prices (“Gas Prices,” Gallup Poll, 3/29/12)
85% Of Americans Want The President And Congress To “Take Immediate Actions To Try And Control The Rising Price Of Gas.” (“Gas Prices,” Gallup Poll, 3/29/12)
Dems Split On Gas Price Debate
Even Within Their Own Caucus, Senate Democrats Are At Odds Over Whether Raising Taxes On Energy Manufacturers Is A Good Idea
Some Senate Dems Call Measure ‘Laughable,’ ‘A Gimmick’
SEN. MARK BEGICH (D-AK): “… we will have wasted 2½ days doing nothing on real energy policy in this country, and people are still going to be paying higher gasoline prices.” (“Senate Votes To Debate Oil Tax Bill,” Politico, 3/26/12)
· BEGICH: “It won’t decrease prices at the pump for our families and small businesses. It will discourage companies, especially the independents, from domestic investment and job creation.” (Sen. Begich, Floor Remarks, 5/11/11)
SEN. MARY LANDRIEU (D-LA): “Maybe it’s just for [President Obama’s] election, which I hope isn’t the case.” “‘That offset is not going to fly, and he should know that… Maybe it’s just for his election, which I hope isn’t the case.’” (“Hill Dems Pick Apart Obama Jobs Plan,” Politico, 9/14/11)
Dem Leaders Admit It’s ‘Not A Question Of Gas Prices’
SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER (D-NY): “This was never intended to talk about lowering prices.” (CNN’s “The Situation Room,” 5/11/11)
SEN. HARRY REID (D-NV): “But it is not a question of gas prices.” (Sen. Reid, Floor Remarks, 5/16/11)
SEN. ROBERT MENENDEZ (D-NJ): “Nobody has made the claim that this bill is about reducing gas prices.” (“McCaskill: Savings From Cutting Oil Tax Breaks Should Be For Deficit Reduction,” The Hill’s E2 Wire Blog, 5/10/11)
SEN. MAX BAUCUS (D-MT): “You know, this is not going to change the price at the gasoline pump. That’s not the issue. I don’t see that as an issue at all.” (U.S. Senate, Finance Committee, Hearing, 5/12/11)
SEN. CARL LEVIN (D-MI): “…this proposal will not alter the economic fundamentals that determine gasoline prices.” (Sen. Levin, Floor Remarks, 5/16/11)
SEN. MARK BEGICH (D-AK): “A gimmick.” “You’re right, this piece of legislation they put down without really a committee process on it is a gimmick, a gimmick to get the next week of activity, and get some press out there.” (Sen. Begich, Floor Remarks, 5/11/11)
SEN. MARY LANDRIEU (D-LA): “Laughable.” “You ask me can I vote for a bill like this. No. Not only can I not vote for it, it’s laughable.” (Sen. Landrieu, Floor Remarks, 5/11/11)
Avg. Price Of Gas Nationwide Now: $3.92 Per Gallon
(“Daily Fuel Gage Report, Current Average, Regular,” AAA, 3/29/12)
WASHINGTON POST: “Two months before the summer driving season officially starts, average gasoline prices in the Washington region have shot past $4, the earliest they have ever surpassed that milestone, AAA Mid-Atlantic said Wednesday.” (“Gas Prices In Washington Surpass $4 A Gallon,” The Washington Post, 3/28/12)
· “… the Oil Price Information Service says national gasoline prices could peak as high as $4.25 a gallon on average this spring.” (“Gas Prices In Washington Surpass $4 A Gallon,” The Washington Post, 3/28/12)
· “Across the country, the price of gas has risen for 20 consecutive days, with only three days of decline in three months.” (“Gas Prices In Washington Surpass $4 A Gallon,” The Washington Post, 3/28/12)
“The cheapest gas is in Wyoming at an average of $3.52 and in Montana with an average of $3.63. Michigan is the sixth most expensive in the country, topped by Hawaii at $4.55, Illinois at $4.31, California at $4.23, Alaska at $4.26 and Washington, D.C.” (“Gas Prices
Dems Admit: Gas Tax Not ‘About Lowering Prices’
According To Dems, Their Tax Hike On Energy Manufacturers ‘Won’t Decrease Prices At The Pump,’ They Say It’s Not ‘About Reducing Gas Prices’
Dem Leader: ‘Not A Question Of Gas Prices’
SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER (D-NY): “This was never intended to talk about lowering prices.” (CNN’s “The Situation Room,” 5/11/11)
SEN. HARRY REID (D-NV): “But it is not a question of gas prices.” (Sen. Reid, Floor Remarks, 5/16/11)
SEN. ROBERT MENENDEZ (D-NJ): “Nobody has made the claim that this bill is about reducing gas prices.” (“McCaskill: Savings From Cutting Oil Tax Breaks Should Be For Deficit Reduction,” The Hill’s E2 Wire Blog, 5/10/11)
SEN. MAX BAUCUS (D-MT): “You know, this is not going to change the price at the gasoline pump. That’s not the issue. I don’t see that as an issue at all.” (U.S. Senate, Finance Committee, Hearing, 5/12/11)
SEN. MARY LANDRIEU (D-LA): “It will not reduce gasoline prices by one penny.” “I would just like to add my strong voice to urging my colleagues to read this bill, to look at it and understand the inherent unfairness in it, the lack of significant deficit reduction, and the fact that it will not, although it is being touted as, it will not reduce gasoline prices by one penny.” (Sen. Landrieu, Floor Remarks, 5/11/11)
SEN. MARK BEGICH (D-AK): “It won’t decrease prices at the pump for our families and small businesses. It will discourage companies, especially the independents, from domestic investment and job creation.” (Sen. Begich, Floor Remarks, 5/11/11)
SEN. CARL LEVIN (D-MI): “…this proposal will not alter the economic fundamentals that determine gasoline prices.” (Sen. Levin, Floor Remarks, 5/16/11)
Avg. Price Of Gas Nationwide Now: $3.90 Per Gallon
(“Daily Fuel Gage Report, Current Average, Regular,” AAA, 3/26/12)
“The average U.S. price of a gallon of gasoline has jumped 11 cents over the past two weeks. That’s according to the Lundberg Survey of fuel prices, released Sunday, which puts the price of a gallon of regular at $3.93.”
· “Of the cities surveyed, Tulsa, Okla., has the nation’s lowest average price for gas at $3.58. Chicago has the highest at $4.56.” (“National Gas Prices Up 11 Cents In Past 2 Weeks,” The Associated Press, 3/25/12)
‘The Main Problem With High Gasoline Prices Is Their Rapid Rise, Not Their Total’
“…Obama suggested that the main problem with high gasoline prices is their rapid rise, not their total of about $4 a gallon. ‘I think that I would have preferred a gradual adjustment,’ Obama said.” (“One Down, More To Go For Republicans Aiding McCain,” The Associated Press, 6/12/08)
· CNBC’S JOHN HARWOOD: “So could these high prices help us?” SEN. BARACK OBAMA (D-IL): “I think that I would have preferred a gradual adjustment.” (CNBC’s “Special Report,” 6/10/08)
Energy Secretary Previously Said He Wanted ‘To Boost The Price Of Gasoline’
STEVEN CHU: “Somehow we have to figure out how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe.” (“Times Tough For Energy Overhaul,” The Wall Street Journal, 12/12/08)
Current Price Of Gas ‘In Europe’
Italy: $9.38 Per Gallon
Germany: $8.41 Per Gallon
France: $8.70 Per Gallon
UK: $8.52 Per Gallon
(“Actual Prices Per On Liter Of Fuel,” Europe’s Energy Portal, Accessed 3/26/12)


