ForAmerica Ad Hits McConnell for Caving on Taxes in Fiscal Cliff Deal #2014

Brent Bozell, Chairman of ForAmerica, a 3 million strong online conservative organization, has launched the first ad of the 2014 cycle and the target is Senate Minority leader Mitch McConnell. The McConnell ad, “Whose Side Are You On,” is running in his home state of Kentucky via Google Display (Google selects key sites on the Google network in Kentucky) and on the Drudge Report, FoxNews.com, The Daily Caller and through Facebook. It’s a five figure online buy to start. The ad links to a petition asking conservatives to sign to let congressional Republicans know they are watching and will hold the GOP accountable when they go against the principles they claim to support.
Conservatives Launch First Ad of 2014 Election Cycle Against McConnell
Mitch McConnell…Obama’s Bag Man
ALEXANDRIA, Va. – ForAmerica Chairman L. Brent Bozell III today announced the 3 million strong social media organization is launching the first ad of the 2014 election cycle against Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell for his capitulation to President Obama and Vice President Joe Biden in fiscal cliff negotiations. The ad will run in the Senator’s home state of Kentucky and in Washington, DC on websites including the Drudge Report, FoxNews.com, and the Daily Caller.
“Conservatives have had it with the Republican Party. The party that was once for freedom and limited government no longer exists. We now have two tax and spend parties in Washington,” said Bozell. “Senator McConnell often talks a tough game and sells himself as a conservative, but his actions speak louder than his words. His role as President Obama’s bag man in the latest fiscal cliff disaster clearly demonstrates that Senator McConnell is more interested in the art of the bad deal rather than standing up and fighting for conservative principles. It is time for conservatives to stand up to politicians in both parties who talk conservative but govern as liberals,” Bozell concluded.
Screen shot of the ad:
Under the Fedora, Road Trip, Hookers and Elections

Under the Fedora is a day late today, a large chunk of the column disappeared down the memory hole and had to be re-written. It a pain but when you have people losing homes and business from a storm it’s a small thing to say.
With One week before the election it’s becoming increasingly clear, even to my fellow conservatives who have been telling me for six months to a year that my predictions of a Republican victory were wrong, to people who said my poll critiques was a case of denial, and to folk who said that no matter what Mitt Romney did Barack Obama’s team would come up with some way to win, that the re-election of Barack Obama is just not going to happen.
It’s a strange contrast, so many on the left are constantly forecasting an apocalypse in climate, massive disease due to franken-foods or that this or that method of energy production will doom all mankind. It’s always the cause of people and the world striking back at them for daring to move science or industry in a forbidden direction. Meanwhile many on the right while having optimism in the country’s people never seem to share that same optimism in their own electoral prospects just KNOWING some unexpected doom , that next shoe is just waiting to drop to spoil their electoral hopes, sort of like Red Sox Fans pre 2004.
It’s been quite a thing to see the slow conversions of conservatives, worry to optimism to confidence to cockiness.
The latest example comes from Ohio where Stacy McCain continues not only to see to see big crowds but also shows a GOP electorate that is willing to suffer extreme measures to do what needs to be done:
George Cullen has been canvassing door-to-door for the past five weeks. He usually hits about 50 doors a day, but only got 25 under the storm conditions yesterday.
If you have an electorate so motivated they are canvassing during hurricanes…
Meanwhile on the left you have actual breakdowns…
For the past several weeks, the 60-year-old San Francisco resident has frequently bolted awake in the middle of the night, in “a panic attack,” she said. She darts for her computer and checks the latest polls. Some days she’s so distraught that she can’t exercise.
Every morning, she gets e-mails from friends who’ve been just as sleepless. Most are so tense, they can croak out only a few words. “Very anxious.” “Worried.”
“Nothing more needs to be said,” said Edelman, a retired educational administrator.
How shallow are people who are having panic attacks over an election. We have people who have lost homes, business, states devastated, people killed and the left is having panic attacks over Obama losing?
There are two cultures in America these days, lets hope our friends on the left, living in their post Christian secular culture can find comfort somewhere.
Speaking of comfort Sen Bob Mendenez (D-NJ) is finding some in the Dominican Republic, or should I say buying some:
Two women from the Dominican Republic told The Daily Caller that Democratic New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez paid them for sex earlier this year.
In interviews, the two women said they met Menendez around Easter at Casa de Campo, an expensive 7,000 acre resort in the Dominican Republic. They claimed Menendez agreed to pay them $500 for sex acts, but in the end they each received only $100.
Jokes about democrat and deficits not withstanding I have to disagree with Stacy McCain who ends his piece with the line:
What would Lilly Ledbetter say?
I hate to be vulgar but as long as he was a secure vote for Abortion she would say “Vote Menendez”
Any person who thinks democrat women who still kneel and worship at the altar of Bill Clinton are going to care about Bob Menendez paying for sex from women in the Dominican Republic has not paid attention to the Democrat party and where they have gone in the last 15 years.
One woman who would not have is the latest Saint in the Catholic Calendar Kateri Tekakwitha the first American Indian, a Mohawk to be a canonized saint in the church. During my road trip I stopped by the shrine in Fonda NY and shot some video:
My full batch of photos are here.
That road trip was to cover different congressional & senate races in NY & CT. There are several worth looking at: Freshman GOP candidates Nan Hayworth in NY-18 & Chris Gibson in NY-19 and in NY-21 you have a GOP challenger Matt Dohney trying to retake the large northernmost district in the state.
The most famous race that I visited was the Senate race in CT as Linda McMahon makes her 2nd attempt to win a senate seat from the state, I spoke to one of her supporters
I also spoke to a women involved in CT politics on the local and state level
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4tVlWXUk5Q&feature=colike
The congressional race she is talking about in CT-5 I think this race is a real sleeper and Andrew Rorabach Is worth keeping an eye on.
So we have a GOP candidate with a long record and some crossover appeal running in an open seat. Unlike Scott Brown in 2010 he doesn’t have the advantage of an opponent making critical mistakes on the trail but also unlike Brown he is not running statewide so his familiarity with the district and the voters could make all the difference.
And in NY-24 Ann Marie Buerkle is running for re-election in a rematch of 2010 against former congressman Dan Maffei. I spoke to her campaign manager
He described Ann as a Great conservative in the NE, facing stiff challenge from a Washington insider well-funded. He calls Ann “the best conservative we have in the North East”, I’m inclined to agree but I wouldn’t limit the description to this area.
and some of her volunteers one of who was actually a intern at WCRN
Strangely enough her opponent Dan “Col Runaway” Maffei continues to duck her including a Candidate forum I covered the people there were not impressed by his absense
and Candidate Ann Marie Buerkle who is one of the most accessible candidates a district has ever seen, didn’t mince words
Dan Maffei should be ashamed of himself and I don’t know how he has the moxie to go out and ask the people for their vote after he has turned down four of these town hall debates, that he’s turned down major network debates, one with the local newspaper. He is afraid to reflect on his record, he is afraid to take responsibility for what he has voted for. All he wants to do is as you said: Attack attack attack rather than looking at what he voted for when he was in congress.
All of these races deserves some of that cash surplus the GOP has but I would particularly suggest the CT-5 race as an excellent chance for a pickup, and while the redistricting in NY-24 wasn’t kind to Congresswoman Buerkle it is an excellent opportunity to confirm that it’s not just Barack Obama but the Democrat party that is being rejected in 2012.
On that same line Ladd Ehlinger has produced this political ad for the Tea Party urging a vote for the GOP.
This is Ladd’s last political ad, he gives many reasons for leaving the realm of politics
Fourth, politicians are, for the most part, clueless. There are exceptions, and I’ve been lucky to have worked with some. But on the other hand… well, I’ll not name names, but for example, in 2010 I made a very popular viral video for one Congressional aspirant. He got hundreds of thousands of hits, and more importantly, hundreds of thousands of dollars in donations. It was just about the only successful thing in his campaign (he lost big-time). But, in 2012, he used someone else – and received neither hits nor donations, and of this writing, seems destined to lose again.
Ladd is a great loss for the right but his movies will be a big gain for everyone.
Finally the World Series is over and the Giants have completed one of the great turnarounds in the history of baseball. Down 2-0 in a 5 game series and 3-1 in a seven game series they managed to win six elimination games and then sweep the formidable Tigers in 4. The most impressive stat. In their last 7 games Giant pitching threw 4 shutouts and gave up a mere 9 runs. That’s a 1.46 ERA those are Bob Gibson type numbers.
Now that’s something
See you after the election.
BA Spending Daily September 27, 2012

![]()
Spending Daily | September 27, 2012
GDP Revised Down to 1.3%, Economic Growth Even Worse Than Thought
The Associated Press reports, “The U.S. economy grew at an even more sluggish pace in the April-June quarter than previously believed as farm production in the Midwest was reduced by a severe drought. The overall economy grew at an annual rate of 1.3 percent in the spring, down from its previous estimate of 1.7 percent growth, the Commerce Department said Thursday. … About half of the downward revision to growth came from the decline in farm inventories. But other areas were weaker as well including slower consumer spending and less growth in exports. The 1.3 percent growth in the spring followed a sluggish 2 percent growth rate in the first quarter, rates too slow to lower unemployment. The unemployment rate was 8.1 percent in August. Most expect it to stay around 8 percent for the rest of this year because they anticipate little pickup in growth.”
“Taxpayers spent $1.4 billion on Obama family last year, perks questioned in new book”
The Daily Caller reports, “Taxpayers spent $1.4 billion dollars on everything from staffing, housing, flying and entertaining President Obama and his family last year, according to the author of a new book on taxpayer-funded presidential perks. In comparison, British taxpayers spent just $57.8 million on the royal family. Author Robert Keith Gray writes in ‘Presidential Perks Gone Royal’ that Obama isn’t the only president to have taken advantage of the expensive trappings of his office. But the amount of money spent on the first family, he argues, has risen tremendously under the Obama administration and needs to be reined in. Gray told The Daily Caller that the $1.4 billion spent on the Obama family last year is the ‘total cost of the presidency,’ factoring the cost of the ‘biggest staff in history at the highest wages ever,’ a 50 percent increase in the numbers of appointed czars and an Air Force One ‘running with the frequency of a scheduled air line.’”
Inherited or Not, We’re Still Spending Too Much
In a recent “60 Minutes” interview with President Obama, host Steve Kroft began with a statement: “Most Americans think we’re spending too much money.” When asked about the national debt (which has grown 51 percent under President Obama) the president went on to say he inherited the debt. But inherited or not, the government is still spending too much. Americans know what President Obama inherited, the question is what has he done to fix it? This year will mark the fourth straight year with trillion dollar deficits. Since 2009 the national debt has increased 51 percent to more than $16 trillion, and at this rate we will reach $21.3 trillion by 2017. Public Notice Executive Director Gretchen Hamel and Policy Director Lenwood Brooks are available to discuss why the president is missing the mark by placing blame rather than offering solutions.
Deficit and Tax Policy Striking Fear into Top Executives
Reuters reports, “Top U.S. executives have less confidence in the business outlook now than at any time in the past three years – and a key reason is fear of gridlock in Washington over the fiscal deficit and tax policy. The uncertainty, coupled with slowing demand in Asia and Europe, is forcing corporate leaders to postpone decisions on major investments and hiring, and hurting sales of everything from textbooks to telephone lines. ‘If we don’t deal with the fiscal cliff and don’t deal with predictability on taxes for both citizens and business, with the rest of the world in a struggling state, this is really bad for us,’ John Chambers, CEO of network equipment maker Cisco Systems Inc (CSCO.O), told Reuters on Tuesday.” The fiscal cliff would most directly effect the defense and health care sectors which would face direct cuts and create a domino effect for other sectors. “The companies that make up the broad Standard & Poor’s 1500 index .15GSPC had $1 trillion in cash and equivalent assets on their books at the end of the second quarter, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S data. That is a hefty sum in comparison to total U.S. gross domestic product, which last year came to $15 trillion.”
Americans Want Solutions On Debt, Just Not Washington’s
Bloomberg reports, “The U.S. public is critical of both Republicans and Democrats in Congress for failing to resolve such issues as the national debt while rejecting the sacrifices that may be needed to fix it. According to a Bloomberg National Poll, Republicans in Congress have an unfavorable rating of 51 percent, and Democrats are only in slightly better shape, with 49 percent of poll respondents viewing them unfavorably. … With Congress recessing until after the Nov. 6 election, lawmakers left a pile of unresolved issues. Chief among them is a debt-reduction agreement that would address the expiring 2001 and 2003 tax cuts and $1.2 trillion in automatic spending reductions set to begin in January. … Even with the public’s frustration with Congress’s inability to address the national debt, there’s little appetite for the type of tax-and-spending measures budget experts say would be necessary to balance the nation’s long-term fiscal demands.”
“It’s Always the Economy, Stupid”
Daniel Henninger editorializes in the Wall Street Journal, “‘Stupid,’ in the famous quotation from 1992′s Clinton vs. Bush campaign—’It’s the economy, stupid’—is whoever thinks a U.S. presidential election is about something else. All presidential elections are about the economy. Yes, there are other issues, but it’s also true that a whale has pilot fish. Still, most politicians would rather talk about anything but the economy, which they see in one of two ways—as a personal piggy bank or a mystery. Neither is discussable in public. This is the sixth presidential election since ‘stupid’ was first identified, and nothing has changed.”
Lawmakers Press for Preserving Sales Tax Deduction
The Hill reports, “More than five dozen House members are pressing leaders of a tax panel to preserve a deduction for state and local sales taxes. The bipartisan group of lawmakers say it would be unfair to voters in their states not to extend the sales tax deduction, given that taxpayers would still be able to deduct state and local income taxes. ‘If the deduction is not extended, millions of taxpayers living in states without an income tax will shoulder a larger share of the federal tax burden since they cannot claim the deduction for state income taxes,’ the lawmakers wrote to the top Democrat and Republican on the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee. … Eight states in all — Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming — currently use a sales tax, but either don’t have or have a very limited state income tax. The income tax deduction for state and local sales taxes expired at the beginning of 2012, like a host of other targeted tax breaks commonly known as extenders. Under the tax breaks, taxpayers can deduct local sales taxes in lieu of deducting state income taxes.”
Did The Check Get Lost In The Mail?
The Hill reports, “The Postal Service announced Wednesday that it would not make a scheduled $5.6 billion payment to the Treasury Department by the end of the month, officially throwing in the towel on a second large payment in as many months. The agency, which lost more than $5 billion in the most recently completed quarter, had been widely expected to default on the prepayment for future retiree benefits, and rushed on Wednesday to assure customers that business would continue as usual. … USPS has lost billions of dollars in recent years, both due to new technology and the downbeat economy. In all, the agency lost $5.1 billion in fiscal 2011, even without having to make a healthcare payment. The Aug. 1, 2012, default came only after Congress pushed back the due date on that particular payment, which was originally due at the end of September 2011. … The Senate measure would give the Postal Service more relief from the prepayment than the current House proposal, but would also not let the agency move as quickly on scrapping Saturday delivery, another key USPS priority.”
Wayne Powell Launches Vulgar Campaign Against Cantor
Democrat Wayne Powell launched his General Election campaign against Eric Cantor last week with deliberate, profanity laced attacks against Eric in an obvious attempt to get national attention and “Hollywood money”.
Two weeks ago Wayne Powell, the Democrat opposing Eric Cantor, announced in the Richmond Times Dispatch that he was revamping his campaign, bringing in new staff, and intended to “nationalize” his campaign against Eric Cantor.
At the time we didn’t know what that meant. Unfortunately now we do.
Since then we have seen a coordinated media blitz to attract attention to his campaign and witnessed as Powell’s campaign has publicly discussed their strategy.
<< WARNING: WE HAVE CLEANED UP OUTRIGHT PROFANITY, BUT STRONG LANGUAGE IS CONTAINED BELOW. >>
The Powell Campaign told the Roanoke Times:
Eric Cantor is a “bought-and-paid-for bastard.”
Then in an interview with The Blue Ridge Caucus added:
“It’s going to be a bloody son of a B%@#*. We’re really going to do some cool S*%#. I’ve got help out of Hollywood and Nashville.”
Then upped the ante in The Daily Caller:
“What he [Eric Cantor] has done is sold out the 7th District and his country….”
And also to The Daily Caller:
“We cannot win this campaign, cannot tell the story on Eric Cantor, if we don’t have bullets.”
So, there you have it. Wayne Powell’s publicly announced strategy to defeat Eric Cantor: vulgarity, profanity, school yard taunts, and questioning the Majority Leader’s patriotism.
At least now we know the kind of campaign Wayne Powell intends to run.
And, we know we have a lot of work to do.
Wayne Powell underestimates the people of Virginia. Virginians are decent, hardworking, and fair-minded. They expect more from their leaders than profanity laced character assassination.
Eric Cantor will take a different approach. Eric believes that America is at a crossroads. The decisions made in this election will determine whether we continue down the road of high unemployment, economic stagnation and massive debt, or we change course, restore fiscal sanity, reduce the deficits, and restore pro-growth, pro-jobs and pro-freedom policies.
Eric Cantor will remain focused on cutting regulations and taxes on small businesses to allow them to create and retain good jobs.
We will leave the name calling and profanity to Mr. Powell’s campaign.
But, this is also a strong reminder to all of us who support Eric and his vision of a prosperous and strong America. We all need to rededicate ourselves to the work necessary to re-elect Eric Cantor to the United States Congress.
Because it is now very clear that Wayne Powell will say anything – no matter how vile – in his attempt to gain power.
Chicago Sun-Times Column Seems to Back Klein’s Assertions About Valerie Jarrett and Obama Chiefs of Staff
A report in the Chicago Sun-Times seems to confirm Ed Klein’s assertions about Obama consigliere Valerie Jarrett. The story is about how Jarrett has not invited former WH Social Secretary Desiree Rogers to her daughter’s wedding, in yet another example of the petty, amateurish infighting in the Obama White House. In his #1 best-seller The Amateur, Klein details the power struggle and backstabbing that has been Jarrett’s calling card. In a recent op-ed for the Daily Caller, Klein wrote of Jarrett: “no other White House official in history has enjoyed such a unique relationship with both a president and a first lady, and yet the mainstream media have ignored Jarrett’s enormous influence over the shape and direction of the Obama administration.” He details her advising failures from the President’s botched Olympic pitch to the disastrous Solyndra loan to her infighting with big-time Chicago pols Bill Daley and Rahm Emanuel, who she squeezed from the inner circle, just like Rogers.
Chicago Sun-Times columnist Michael Sneed (writing in third person): “Sneed has also learned two of Jarrett’s former White House irritants have not been invited: Former White House chiefs of staff Rahm Emanuel and Bill Daley.”
Ed Klein in the Daily Caller: “During the savage internecine warfare between Jarrett and Obama’s first two chiefs of staff — Rahm Emanuel and Bill Daley — Obama sided most of the time with Jarrett, a classic limousine liberal who believes that Obama was elected president in order to engineer social change. Ultimately, Jarrett emasculated Emanuel and Daley and forced them from their jobs.”
#MASen Update: The Elizabeth Warren Native American Controversy Continues to Gain Steam
Breaking into the national spotlight over the last 24 hours. The New York Times reports today, The half-court basketball shot that Senator Scott P. Brown sank on Friday during a visit to a youth center — recorded by his staff and widely circulated on the Web — was just the beginning. So far this week, Mr. Brown, a Republican, has won endorsements by Democratic former mayors of Boston and Worcester, given a speech emphasizing his votes across party lines and released a radio ad calling on Americans to “work together now” despite partisan differences. By contrast, Elizabeth Warren, his main Democratic challenger for the United States Senate seat once held by Edward M. Kennedy, has been engulfed in controversy stemming from accusations by the Brown camp that she sought an unfair advantage in her academic career by claiming American Indian ancestry….“He’s touring the state touting his bipartisanship while she’s on the defensive with a diversity issue,” said Peter Ubertaccio, a professor of political science at Stonehill College in Easton, Mass. “The juxtaposition is not good for her.”…. David Paleologos, a pollster at Suffolk University in Boston, said it seemed unlikely that Ms. Warren could move past the issue unless she addressed it head on. “Now, it’s like every day there’s some new discovery or some new twist,” he said. “It’s not even about ancestry anymore; it’s about gaming the system and why did you do this?”
- And National Public Radio reports that even Warren’s own supporters are growing disenchanted – Warren supporter Paul Venecko of Boston is disappointed that she claimed native heritage at all. He’s also American Indian — part Narragansett. “I’m a quarter, and it’s so far recessed behind me that I really can’t reference it for any particular reason, and I just feel like Elizabeth Warren probably has even less reason,” he says. Venecko had been planning to vote for her. Now he’s less certain.
- Meanwhile, Warren continues to get hammered on the home front as her campaign is unable – or unwilling – to address basic questions behind her conflicting stories. As the Boston Herald reports today, Warren’s embattled campaign has been rocked by questions about whether she used her Native American status to further her career. Under fire from the press, campaign aides scrambled late Monday night and found what they claim is a link to her Cherokee lineage — a great-great-great-grandmother on her mother’s side. Warren aides clammed up yesterday and refused to answer questions about why she stopped listing herself in the AALS directory after 1995. Around that time, Harvard Law School started boasting that Warren was their first minority female professor.
- And while there are a number of columns slamming Warren today, don’t miss this one from Boston radio show host Michael Graham who writes this in the Boston Herald – I’ve known for a fact since I was a little boy that I was part Cherokee. I’ve even seen photos of my great-great-grandmother. But, unlike Princess “Rides In Limos” Warren, it never occurred to me to do what “Rides In Limos” Warren has done, and use my distant ethnic background to my advantage…. Goodbye, principled liberal Liz Warren. Hello Princess Pinochio-Hantas.
- Finally, don’t miss this story from The Daily Caller — It would not have been “appropriate” for Massachusetts Senate hopeful Elizabeth Warren to claim to be an American Indian minority if she did so solely to get a professional advantage, says a former U.S. senator who was once the only Native American in Congress. “I think if she used it just to get some kind of advantage — whatever it was — like a job application or something, then that’s probably not appropriate,” former Colorado Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell told The Daily Caller in an interview on Tuesday.
Native American group: Elizabeth Warren ‘better be able to defend’ ancestry claim
From the Daily Caller:
A prominent Native American group says Massachusetts Senate hopeful Elizabeth Warren had “better be able to defend” her past claims of being an Indian-American minority.
The Democratic candidate is facing questions about her heritage following the revelation on Friday that she described herself as a Native American minority in professional law school directories during the 1980s and ’90s.
“Once you put that down, you better be able to defend it,” Ray Ramirez of the Native American Rights Fund told The Daily Caller on Monday.
Warren, who no longer publicly refers to herself as Native American, has disputed that she claimed Indian-American minority status then to give herself a professional advantage.
Asked for evidence of her ancestry to back up the candidate’s past statements, a Warren spokeswoman told TheDC on Monday that the campaign is “working on digging up some sort of evidence to appease” inquirers.
But the campaign hasn’t been able to immediately provide any documentation. The Boston Herald reported Friday that the Warren campaign said the “tales of Warren’s Cherokee and Delaware tribe ancestors have been passed down through family lore.”
Ramirez said anyone who claims in writing to be a Native American should have some sort of supporting documentation. “If you’re a member of a federally recognized tribe, then that means you would have a tribal enrollment number,” he said. (RELATED: Warren campaign says it’s digging up evidence of Native American heritage to satisfy the press)
Democrats’ Failed Economic Record: Stimulus and President Obama’s So-Called Buffett Tax Rule
Driving The Discussion Today….
Today marks the third anniversary of the Democrats’ $825 billion “stimulus” and the NRSC and Republican Senate candidates around the country are highlighting the mile-wide gap between the rhetoric of Senate Democrats three years ago versus their economic record today. As Politico’s Morning Score previews, Watch for lots of state Republican parties and Republican Senate candidates to attack Obama and Democratic incumbents on the stimulus through today. The National Republican Senatorial Committee is up with a one-minute web video {below} to highlight the president’s statement about turning the economy around in three years.
Democratic Senate candidates on the stimulus
Nelson: “Florida’s Drastic Rise In Unemployment Deserves Immediate Attention And Swift Action. The Senate’s Stimulus Package Will Provide Jobs That Lay A Foundation For A Clean-Energy Future. It Also Has Special Provisions That Will Help Homeowners Who Are Facing Foreclosure.” (Senator Bill Nelson Website, “Floridians’ Top Concerns: Retirement, Health Care, Jobs,” www.billnelson.senate.gov, Accessed 12/13/10)
Kaine Said The Stimulus Was One Of The First Flagstones In The “Road To Recovery.” “From his efforts came the first flagstones in the road to recovery. The Recovery Act, which put vital dollars back into the pockets of working families, pumped critical funding into high-growth industries and promoted projects that employed Americans and improved vital infrastructure.” (Tim Kaine, Op-Ed, “The President’s Progress,” Politico, 12/31/10)
Berkley Said The Stimulus Bill Would “Create Or Save 4 Million Jobs Over The Next Two Years,” Nationwide. Shelley Berkley: “The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act will create or save 4 million jobs over the next two years. In my district, thousands of construction workers will be put back to work improving infrastructure, building renewable energy facilities, improving school buildings and generally strengthening the future of our nation.” (“Rep. Berkley Urges Passage Of Broad Stimulus Package,” Congresswoman Shelley Berkley Press Release, 1/27/09)
Tester’s Press Release Said The Stimulus Would Create “Millions Of New Jobs” And Cut Taxes “By Hundreds Of Billions Of Dollars.” “Both of Montana’s U.S. Senators today voted in favor of a plan to rebuild America’s struggling economy by creating millions of new jobs, investing in long-term infrastructure, and cutting taxes by hundreds of billions of dollars. Senators Max Baucus and Jon Tester voted to pass the Jobs Bill, formally known as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.” (Senator Jon Tester, “Baucus, Tester Vote For Final Jobs Bill, At Least $626 Million For Montana,” Press Release, 2/13/09)
Stabenow: “So This Is — This Is A Jobs Bill, Number One, Jobs Rebuilding America, Jobs In The Green Economy. It’s Also About Making Sure We Keep People Working, Keep Our Police Officers On The Streets, And Focus On Quality Schools.” (Fox News Channel, 1/28/09)
Sherrod Brown: “So It’s Not Just Shovel-Ready Projects That Are Ready To Go Now That Will Create Jobs, It’s Also – It’s Also Green Jobs, And It’s Also Building For The Future, So When You Do Economic Stimulus, It Really Needs To Look At What Kinds Of Jobs It’s Going To Create, Not Just Immediately But Two Years, Five Years, Ten Years Down The Road.” (ABC’s, “This Week,” 12/28/08)
Baldwin Said The Stimulus Would Create Or Save 67,000 Jobs In Wisconsin. Baldwin: “In Wisconsin alone, this bill will create or save more than 67,000 jobs, and provide more than $1 billion in health care for the uninsured, Baldwin explained.” (Rep. Tammy Baldwin, “Baldwin Votes For Economic Recovery Plan,” Press Release, 1/29/09)
Heinrich Called The Stimulus A “Jobs Creation Package” And Said It Would “Rebuild America’s Economy.” “‘This jobs creation package will rebuild America’s economy, making us more globally competitive and energy independent, while providing 95% of Americans with immediate tax relief,’ said Rep. Heinrich.” (Congressman Martin Heinrich, “New Mexico Delegation Supports American Recovery And Reinvestment Act That Could Create 22,000 Jobs In New Mexico,” Press Release, 2/13/09)
- And National Review’s Jim Geraghty writes, The National Republican Senatorial Committee reminds us that the stimulus passed, three years ago today, in a web video that represents a beautiful example of using lawmakers’ own boasts and promises against them.
Staying on the Democrats’ failed economic record, the Daily Caller reports that President’s top budget officials are desperately trying to duck the deficit and debt debate. President Barack Obama’s top budget officials are trying to deflect questions about debt and deficits, especially because his latest 10-year spending plan would boost government spending more than $1 trillion above the deficit-trimming deal that he signed in August….It’s “a rope-a-dope performance worthy of Muhammad Ali,” said Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, the lead Republican on the Democratic-dominated Senate Budget Committee. Their evasiveness is caused by their boss’ campaign-trail desire to claim that he is cutting spending more than he increases taxes, Sessions told The Daily Caller.
Speaking of campaign trail gimmicks, don’t miss this piece in today’s New York Times pulling back the curtain on President Obama’s so-called Buffett Tax Rule. President Obama has made the Buffett Rule, mandating that millionaires pay at least 30 percent of their incomes in taxes, the centerpiece of his campaign for “fairness.” But look for it among the myriad tax changes the White House detailed in the 2013 budget proposal it released this week, and you will not find it. The Buffett Rule has become a signal piece of election-year political rhetoric. It featured heavily in Mr. Obama’s State of the Union address last month. It has become a favored talking point on the campaign trail. And Mr. Obama underscored his support of it in his budget proposal. But the White House says it is a “guideline,” rather than a legislative initiative. And it says it prefers not to establish the Buffett Rule without a broader overhaul of the tax code, though it would support a Congressional effort to carry it out alone.
Confirmed: White House Officials Sat In On Solyndra Meetings
From Gateway Pundit:
But, there’s more…
Top Obama bundler George Kaiser made multiple visits to the White House in the months before the company was granted a $535 million loan from the government. And top Solyndra officials also made numerous visits — 20 — to the White House, according to logs and reporting by The Daily Caller. Solyndra officials in the logs included chairman and founder Christian Gronet and board members Thomas Baruch and David Prend. The company secured the $535 million loan despite the fact that it was widely known Solyndra was in deep economic trouble and had negative cash flows since its inception.Kaiser said he did not use political influence or talk to administration officials about a massive government loan to Solyndra.
(Solyndra)It has now been confirmed that White House officials sat in on the Solyndra meetings this past year.
The Blotter reported:
Democrat Video #Fail: Welcome to Detroit, Mitt Romney
The DNC continues to beclown itself with lame video’s like this one attacking Mitt Romney:




