That’s what one veteran House Democrat said recently about H.R. 7, the American Energy & Infrastructure Act, which, in addition to having no earmarks, eliminates or consolidates nearly 70 duplicative transportation programs and removes government barriers to job creation.

This pro-growth approach is “markedly different” from infrastructure bills written in the past by leaders in both parties, who stuffed highway bills with earmarks, many of which siphoned off resources from high-priority projects.   In 2005, a Republican-led Congress passed a federal highway bill containing more than 6,300 earmarks.  Speaker Boehner was one of eight lawmakers to vote against the bill.  “Every few years we go through the same inefficient, top-down approach that we’re going through now, and how do taxpayers and drivers benefit? We really don’t,” Boehner said at the time.  “This process is clearly broken.”

H.R. 7 reforms the process from top to bottom: no earmarks and no ‘stimulus’ spending, only pro-growth reforms that link expanded energy production to infrastructure repair and cut through red tape to ensure taxpayer resources are used wisely and efficiently.  Still, House Democrats continue to chafe at the lack of earmarks in the bill, and it is perhaps one reason why many of them oppose it.  One House Democrat recently told POLITICO: “I think people would be more enthusiastic” if the bill included more earmarks.  The fact that H.R. 7 would lead to the creation of more than one million new private-sector jobs should be enough cause for enthusiasm.

Earlier this week, in an interview with PBS’ NewsHour, Speaker Boehner highlighted how H.R. 7 is good for job creation and has no earmarks:

“The American Energy & Infrastructure Jobs Act will be up here in the next couple of weeks … opening up more areas for energy development and using those new revenues … to pay for our aging infrastructure that needs real repair.  And we’ll do this in a way that has no earmarks.  You know, the last highway bill had 6,317 earmarks in it, little projects for members of Congress and their districts, some of them not-so-little.   No earmarks.”

In addition to having no earmarks, H.R. 7 eliminates or consolidates nearly 70 duplicative transportation programs.  According to the Transportation & Infrastructure Committee:

“Currently, there are over 100 federal surface transportation programs, many of which were created over the last 50 years to expand the scope of the original programmatic goals.  Many of these programs are duplicative or do not serve a national interest.   The American Energy & Infrastructure Jobs Act reforms surface transportation programs by consolidating or eliminating approximately 70 programs that are duplicative or do not serve a federal purpose.”

By eliminating or consolidating these programs, the American Energy & Infrastructure Jobs Act helps ensure taxpayer resources go to high-priority projects that have a direct connection to our economy – not bike paths and beautification projects.

Republicans’ “focus on curbing government spending has transformed the discussion on transportation over the last year,” National Journal reports.  “Earmarks, which once drove the entire surface transportation authorization process, are now a thing of the past.” 

Visit the blogtomorrow to read part four in our series on pro-growth reforms in H.R. 7.

READ MORE

·         H.R. 7 Ensures Scarce Taxpayer Dollars Are Focused on High-Priority Infrastructure Projects, Not Wasteful Pork

·         H.R.7 Removes Barriers to Energy Production to Create More Than a Million New Private-Sector Jobs

Paul may be very transparent about the hypocrisy of requesting an earmark then voting against the bill (because he knows it will pass), but his twisted logic doesn’t make it any less hypocritical.

Whenever I post something negative about Ron Paul (which is just about every time I post about him), I get the NASTIEST comments and emails. He doesn’t have a lot of supporters but those that do are very well organized and support him with a passion. What they don’t understand is Ron Paul does not represent himself truthfully. Along with his history of being a “drooling crazy” type and a bigot, the man is the typical Washington DC spin-master, saying one thing but doing another. He has a good fiscal script but frankly we have all seen that movie before and it got old a long time ago.