VIDEO: Six Degrees of News: May 6, 2013


Israeli warplanes strike near Syria’s capital city; the Fortune 500 list is announced; Iron Man 3 makes history at the box office and more.
Sean Penn on Hugo Chavez’s Death: ‘I Lost a Friend’ :Update

Ah cannot forget the Leftists in Hollywood have lost a friend.
“I mourn a great hero,” said Oliver Stone of the Venezuelan president who died on Tuesday after a long bout with cancer.
…
“Today the people of the United States lost a friend it never knew it had. And poor people around the world lost a champion,” says Penn in a statement to The Hollywood Reporter. ”I lost a friend I was blessed to have. My thoughts are with the family of President Chavez and the people of Venezuela.
Good Lord, the guy was a dictator and a tyrant.
Feature pic via The Hollywood Reporter
Update: They held a vigil for Hugo in San Fran Weasel Zippers
Get the Federal Government Out of the Natural Gas Business

In North Dakota, people have jobs. That state led the nation in job creation last year, and its unemployment rate is only 3.2 percent (compared to the national rate of 7.9 percent). Why?
One word: energy.
As Nicolas Loris, Heritage’s Herbert and Joyce Morgan Fellow, writes in a forthcoming paper:
Technological advancements in directional drilling and hydraulic fracturing have led to an abundance of natural gas production in the United States that is fundamentally changing the energy landscape. The result has been more jobs, economic growth, and consistently low domestic natural gas prices in what has known to be a historically volatile market.
Despite media misinformation and Hollywood portrayals like Promised Land, the fact remains that hydraulic fracturing, also called fracking, is being done responsibly and is revitalizing local economies like Williston, North Dakota.
>>> Watch our video about the people who are flocking to North Dakota for work
Loris notes that the United States has more than a century’s worth of natural gas beneath its soil at current consumption rates. With more than 12 million Americans out of work, you would think that an economic boom like this would be welcomed—but once again, the federal government is standing in the way.
To export natural gas, companies have to gain approval from two federal agencies and their state. Thus far, the Department of Energy (DOE) has granted only one permit out of 17 applications to countries with which the U.S. does not have a free trade agreement. Loris says this should stop:
The DOE’s role in permit authorization is completely unnecessary and U.S. producers should be allowed to export [liquefied natural gas] to any country they see fit…Natural gas should be treated as any other good traded around the world…It should not be up to the Department of Energy or any federal agency to determine what amount of natural gas to export is in the public’s interest.
Tomorrow, the Senate will begin to consider the future of natural gas as the Energy and Natural Resources Committee holds a hearing on environmental factors, imports and exports, and the economy.
Unleashing natural gas production in the U.S. is important for domestic energy—it provides about 30 percent of America’s electricity and is used for heating and cooling homes, stoves, furnaces, and water heaters. More cars, buses, and trucks are running on natural gas as well. But it is also a plentiful resource that we can export. As Loris explains:
Providing other countries with cheaper energy would not only lower the prices of products that the U.S. imports (because businesses could make the products more cheaply), it would also promote economic development in those countries so that they import more American goods. The marginal price increases of natural gas in the U.S. as a result of exports would incentivize even more domestic production.
The Department of Energy released a study that concluded that the gains from exporting natural gas are overwhelmingly positive for the U.S. economy. The study also found that exporting natural gas would increase American export revenue from $10 billion to $30 billion annually. Our economy could certainly use that boost.
But federal meddling threatens to derail this valuable resource development—for no good reason. The states have been incredibly successful in promoting fracking safely and protecting the environment. Loris highlights their records:
In Pennsylvania, fracking has been taking place since the 1960s, with nearly 100,000 oil and gas wells fracked and no instances of contamination of groundwater. The same clean record is true for Ohio, where over 70,000 oil and gaswells have been fracked since the 1960s. The Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission has compiled statistics for all 50 states, each of which has a flawless record when it comes to fracking and groundwater protection.
With such successes, the federal government does not need to pile on the red tape. States are effectively tapping their resources and taking care of their people and their lands. Lifting restrictions on natural gas exports would provide even more of an economic boon from America’s energy revolution. With its unnecessary permitting holdups, the Department of Energy is simply preventing more towns from booming and the country from benefiting.
To learn more about fracking, check out the film FrackNation.
Originally posted at The Foundry by Amy Payne
New Crossroads Ad: Ashley Judd for Tennessee! Errr, Kentucky.

With all the Daily Courier’s buzz about Ashley Judd’s prospects as a candidate for United States Senate, some have mused that the Courier Journal would actually start a “Super PAC” to support her.
Given how competitive the Super PAC space is, American Crossroads today preempted that effort by launching our very own Ashley Judd for Senate advertisement, entitled “Ashley’s Story,” linked below.
In it, you’ll find how Ashley Judd:
- Embraces her fellow Kentucky “hillbillies!”
- Vows to “follow” Obama anywhere!
- Champions and boasts about Obamacare!
- Calls herself “aggressively and delightfully radical!”
- Calls Tennessee her “home!”
- How her grandma calls her a “Hollywood liberal!”
The ad concludes: “Ashley Judd: An Obama-following radical Hollywood liberal, who’s right at home in Tennessee. I mean Kentucky.”
The ad is backed by $10,000 in paid digital advertising, starting today and running two weeks in Kentucky.
At American Crossroads, we hope you enjoy watching the ad as much as we enjoyed creating it.
Debt Wish: Loop Fiasco

![]()
Debt Wish: Loop Fiasco
President Obama on Sunday called for closing tax loopholes in order to increase revenue and reduce the federal deficit. But just over a month ago Washington passed a deal to avert the fiscal cliff that included a host of tax breaks for special interests, while forcing every American to pay a little more. So when President Obama says we need to close the loopholes to increase revenue, will these sweetheart giveaways be on the chopping block? Somehow we doubt it.
OBAMA CALLS FOR INCREASED REVENUE BY CLOSING TAX LOOPHOLES
President Obama: Let’s Close Tax Loopholes. “President Barack Obama said there is ‘no doubt’ the government needs new revenue from closing tax ’loopholes’ and limiting deductions, along with enacting spending cuts, to reduce the federal deficit.” (Roger Runningen, “Obama Says U.S. Needs Revenue Along With Spending Cuts,” Bloomberg, 2/4/13)
FLASHBACK: FISCAL CLIFF DEAL INCLUDES BILLIONS IN TAX LOOPHOLES
Fiscal Cliff Bill Extends Tax Cuts For Select Few. “…The ‘fiscal cliff’ bill that passed Congress on Tuesday contained a bonanza for single-issue lobbyists, extending supports for Puerto Rican rum distillers, Hollywood studios, tribal-lands coal, electric-scooter makers and other corporate interests that Congress will subsidize through the tax code for another year or two.” (Editorial, “Congress Gives Out End-of-Year Perks to Interest Groups, Washington Post, 1/2/13)
$100 Billion In Special Tax Credits. “… Under the plan, the federal government would eat nearly $100 billion in forgone tax revenue over the next two years by extending special tax credits for select businesses that had been set to expire.” (Devin Dwyer, “’Fiscal Cliff Deal Also Doles Out Millions for Hollywood, Railroads, Rum Producers,” ABC News, 1/1/13)
$430 Million For Hollywood. “$430 million for Hollywood through ‘special expensing rules’ to encourage TV and film production in the United States. Producers can expense up to $15 million of costs for their projects.” (Devin Dwyer, “’Fiscal Cliff Deal Also Doles Out Millions for Hollywood, Railroads, Rum Producers,” ABC News, 1/1/13)
$59 Million For Algae Growers. (Devin Dwyer, “’Fiscal Cliff Deal Also Doles Out Millions for Hollywood, Railroads, Rum Producers,” ABC News, 1/1/13)
$331 Million For Puerto Rico And The Virgin Islands Rum Subsidies. (Devin Dwyer, “’Fiscal Cliff Deal Also Doles Out Millions for Hollywood, Railroads, Rum Producers,” ABC News, 1/1/13)
Extends Tax Credit For Indian Coal Facilities. (“Other nuggets in the fiscal cliff bill: Rum, electric vehicles and motor sports,” CNN Political Ticker, 1/1/13)
Extends Tax Credit For Wind Energy Industry. (Kathleen Caggiano, “Incentives Watch: Fiscal Cliff Legislation Temporarily Bolsters Renewable Energy Industry,” Bloomberg BNA, 1/9/13)
VIDEO: Hollywood’s Next Manhunt Blockbuster: John McAfee


Hollywood is ready to coin 2013 the year of the “manhunt.” Warner Brothers will adapt a Wired article to script the next cat and mouse thriller: John McAfee: The Movie.
Debt Wish: Cheating Debt

![]()
Debt Wish: Cheating Debt
According to the Associated Press, the fiscal cliff deal was “supposed to be a way to force Washington to confront our long-term debt problem.” Unfortunately for Americans, politics prevailed. After taking us to the brink of another recession, Washington still managed to carve out some special stocking stuffers for their favorite political allies. If higher taxes were a serious solution to reducing our deficit, would lawmakers really be giving breaks to Hollywood studios, Puerto Rican rum distillers and electric scooter makers? Instead of pushing for real tax reform, it looks like Washington is back to picking winners and losers.
CRONY CAPITALISM: DEFICIT REDUCTION DEAL INCLUDES HOST OF POLITICAL GIVEAWAYS
Lucky Few Escape Fiscal Cliff Tax Hikes:
Fiscal Cliff Bill Extends Tax Cuts For Select Few. “…The ‘fiscal cliff’ bill that passed Congress on Tuesday contained a bonanza for single-issue lobbyists, extending supports for Puerto Rican rum distillers, Hollywood studios, tribal-lands coal, electric-scooter makers and other corporate interests that Congress will subsidize through the tax code for another year or two.” (Editorial, “Congress Gives Out End-of-Year Perks to Interest Groups, Washington Post, 1/2/13)
$100 Billion In Special Tax Credits. “… Under the plan, the federal government would eat nearly $100 billion in forgone tax revenue over the next two years by extending special tax credits for select businesses that had been set to expire.” (Devin Dwyer, “’Fiscal Cliff Deal Also Doles Out Millions for Hollywood, Railroads, Rum Producers,” ABC News, 1/1/13)
$430 Million For Hollywood. “$430 million for Hollywood through ‘special expensing rules’ to encourage TV and film production in the United States. Producers can expense up to $15 million of costs for their projects.” (Devin Dwyer, “’Fiscal Cliff Deal Also Doles Out Millions for Hollywood, Railroads, Rum Producers,” ABC News, 1/1/13)
$59 Million For Algae Growers. (Devin Dwyer, “’Fiscal Cliff Deal Also Doles Out Millions for Hollywood, Railroads, Rum Producers,” ABC News, 1/1/13)
$331 Million For Puerto Rico And The Virgin Islands Rum Subsidies. (Devin Dwyer, “’Fiscal Cliff Deal Also Doles Out Millions for Hollywood, Railroads, Rum Producers,” ABC News, 1/1/13)
Extends Tax Credit For Indian Coal Facilities. (“Other nuggets in the fiscal cliff bill: Rum, electric vehicles and motor sports,” CNN Political Ticker, 1/1/13)
Extends Tax Credit For Wind Energy Industry. (CJ Ciaramella, “Congress Extends Eagle-Killing Wind Incentive,” Washington Free Beacon, 1/2/13)
WASHINGTON BACK TO PICKING WINNERS AND LOSERS, PUTTING POLITICS OVER ECONOMY
Sweetheart Deals Undermine Deficit Reduction:
Washington’s Favorites Secure ‘Sweetheart Deals.’ “…As usual, well-connected special interest groups — from Hollywood to the booze lobby — secured sweetheart deals for their own narrow interests. So the industry that employs Sean Penn and Ed Asner gets a nice fat tax break, and poor people with jobs get the shaft. The people who rail against ‘corporate welfare’ and ‘crony capitalism’ took the time to cut a nice side deal for the rum industry.” (Kevin D. Williamson, “Opinion: Democrats Raise Taxes on Poor to Subsidize Millionaires,” National Review, 1/2/13)
Only Some Will ‘Finally Pay Their Fair Share.’ “Obama said Tuesday that ‘millionaires and billionaires’ will finally ‘pay their fair share.’ That is, unless you are a Nascar track owner, a wind-energy company or the owners of StarKist Tuna, among many others who managed to get their taxes reduced in Congress’s New Year celebration… Congress and the White House want everyone to ignore this corporate-welfare blowout.” (Editorial, “Crony Capitalism Blowout,” Wall Street Journal, 1/2/13)
Real Costs Outweigh The Estimates. “The costs of all this are far greater than the estimates conjured by the Joint Tax Committee. They include slower economic growth from misallocated capital, lower revenues for the Treasury and thus more pressure to raise rates on everyone, and greater public cynicism that government mainly serves the powerful.” (Editorial, “Crony Capitalism Blowout,” Wall Street Journal, 1/2/13)
Congress Dodges What Fiscal Cliff Deal Was Originally Designed To Do: Address Deficits And Debt. “The ‘fiscal cliff’ deadline was originally designed to force lawmakers to confront trillion-dollar annual budget deficits that pile the nation’s debts higher each year. … The next two months will be another opportunity to come up with a plan or dodge the issues again.” (Connie Cass, Fiscal Cliff Deal Leaves Lots Of Issues Dangling,” Associated Press, 1/3/13)
Failure To Confront Debt Just The Latest In A “Long Series” Of Broken Promises. “Congress’ hectic resolution of the ‘fiscal cliff’ crisis is the latest in a long series of decisions by lawmakers and the White House to do less than promised – and to ask Americans for little sacrifice – in confronting the nation’s burgeoning debt.” (Charles Babington, “Analysis: Cliff Deal Is Another Pain-Free Punt,” Associated Press, 1/3/13)
“CORPORATE PORK” CRITICAL TO FINAL PASSAGE
Fiscal Cliff Bill Becomes All About “Corporate Pork”:
‘Tax Extenders’ Critical Part Of Fiscal Cliff Bill. “…What wasn’t mentioned is what these leaders wanted, which is what’s known as ‘tax extenders,’ or roughly $205 billion of tax breaks for corporations. With such a banal name, and boring and difficult to read line items in the bill, few political operatives have bothered to pay attention to this part of the bill. But it is critical to understanding what is going on.” (Matt Stoller, “Eight Corporate Subsidies in the Fiscal Cliff Bill, From Goldman Sachs to Disney to NASCAR,” Huffington Post, 1/2/13)
Trading Off Billions Of Dollars In ‘Corporate Pork.’ “Surely, a modest hike in income taxes for people who make more than $400,000 in income and stupid enough not to take that money in capital gain would be worth trading off for the few hundred billion dollars in corporate pork. This is what the fiscal cliff is about — who gets the money. And by leaving out the corporate sector, nearly anyone who talks about this debate is leaving out a key-negotiating partner.” (Matt Stoller, “Eight Corporate Subsidies in the Fiscal Cliff Bill, From Goldman Sachs to Disney to NASCAR,” Huffington Post, 1/2/13)
Designed To Reduce Deficit, Instead Adds $74 Billion In Spending. “The ‘fiscal cliff’ law passed so quickly, many in Congress never realized it was full of special interest tax breaks…the fiscal cliff law designed to reduce the deficit, added $74 billion in spending through changes in the tax law.” (Wyatt Andrews, “’Fiscal Cliff’ Bill Had Some Hidden Pork,” CBS News, 1/2/13)
What Happened To No More Pork Barrel Spending? “The issue with these middle-of-the-night tax breaks is that for many in Congress who had sworn off pork barrel spending, these represent a new level of pork.” (Wyatt Andrews, “’Fiscal Cliff’ Bill Had Some Hidden Pork,” CBS News, 1/2/13)
Clint Eastwood Slams Obama on Benghazi: There Should Have Been an Attempt to Save Men

Clint Eastwood: “I find myself being very resentful about this whole thing in Benghazi. That’s been kind of a tragedy that should have never happened. Or there should have been an attempt. All that you can ask is when there is a crisis like that is to make an attempt. That is the American way.
41 Million Tea Party Supporters Set to Vote

From Breitbart:
The Tea Party is regularly ridiculed and declared “dead” by the mainstream press and their elitist allies in Washington and Hollywood. Not surprisingly, when Tea Partiers show up and rally by the thousands, they get all but ignored, while 30 Occupy Wall Street crazies in masks will always get wall-to-wall coverage and admiration. TV shows and movies take cheap shots at Tea Party conservatives, often linking them to murder-of-the-week cases on insipid crime procedurals or dismissing them as “birthers.” But a new Associated Press poll shows tea party supporters may have the last laugh in November.
The AP/GFK poll shows that 31% of likely voters consider themselves Tea Party supporters. With 131 million votes cast in the 2008 elections, that translates into an incredible voting bloc of 41 million Tea Party supporters waiting to cast ballots. These voters have already made their voices heard in Wisconsin earlier this year, as well as in Republican primaries in Texas and Nebraska.
That 31% of likely voters figure is greater than the 19% who described themselves as either strongly or somewhat liberal. Surprisingly, liberals have escaped media characterization as being a small, fringe-like group with little power or influence. At 19% of likely voters, self-described liberals would have a turnout of 25 million voters, some 16 million fewer voters than the Tea Party.
The Clint Eastwood Gambit Worked Perfectly, But Not in the Way People Think

When I saw the Clint Eastwood speech yesterday, an image formed in my mind:

For those too young to remember that is Rowan & Martin’s Laugh-In and John Wayne in that bunny suit. That’s the last time I saw something this Ayptical from a Hollywood icon.
I thought Eastwood’s presentation was one of the weirdest things I’ve ever seen, somebody said on TV it was a variation of an old Morry Amsterdam bit (Eastwood is certainly old enough to remember Amsterdam) but that might just have been a bad joke.
Nevertheless I submit that the Clint Eastwood bit worked absolutely perfectly for the GOP in general and Mitt Romney in particular. Here is why:
1. The Presence:
A lot of people who normally wouldn’t have tuned into the RNC yesterday tuned in to see Eastwood.
2. The oddity of it:
If it was a regular “Make my Day” speech they would have changed the channel when it was done, this was so odd that I suspect people kept the TV there just to see what people might say about it or if there was any odd reaction.
3. The memorable lines:
Because Eastwood bit was so odd, the memorable lines “Politicians are employees of ours”, “When somebody does not do the job, you gotta let ‘em go.” stood out and will be remembered.
4. The lead-in:
Those folks who stayed looking for Eastwood reactions who normally would have gone caught Marco Rubio, who hit it out of the park for Romney and he gave a speech that would hold them.
5. The Comparison:
The Mitt Romney speech contrasted to the Eastwood bit was a smashing success.
6. Drawing their fire:
Take a look at this image from Memeorandum as of 8:31 AM
And here is the stuff on the Romney speech same page:
What is Missing? Attacks on Romney’s speech! Today was the day that the Democrats should be hitting Romney’s speech and trying to counter it a-la Ryan. Instead the readers of the Morning papers, Cable TV and the left blogs are reading attacks on Eastwood. Clint Eastwood is playing the same role as a hero in an old western, drawing all the fire so the good guy could escape unharmed.
7. Picking on an old man:
The left has been particularly strong hitting Clint Eastwood, Here are three images from Twitchy
Not only is it not smart to hit an American Icon, what do you think the reaction of the elderly voters who always show up will be to the “pick on the old guy” bit? I suspect it won’t play well at all.
For tall these reasons Clint Eastwood appearance at the RNC made my day and I suspect it made the Romney campaign’s day too.
Cross-Posted from Datechguy’s Blog







